Originally posted by Surtur
I did clearly state my position multiple times. Rob then went back and pretended to misunderstand a post in order to get an eWin.🙂
so you're against the idea of any adult having sex with a child, and if the genders were reversed you would hope that the judge delivers the same verdict? not trying to strawman, i would just feel some absurd satisfaction to actually know your position on something
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so you're against the idea of any adult having sex with a child, and if the genders were reversed you would hope that the judge delivers the same verdict? not trying to strawman, i would just feel some absurd satisfaction to actually know your position on something
I feel that the genders don't matter it's wrong either way. I also feel that if some douchenozzle is gonna say "haa, 13 yr. old boy living it up! the time of his life!" that shit best be applied to both sides or it's hypocrisy.
There is no "okay for a female teacher to f*ck her student, but not okay for a male". If you accept one you need to accept the other. This doesn't mean I personally accept either one.
Originally posted by Surtur
It's not a compliment, any rational adult would have understood. Only the irrational would get it, and then later on suddenly act like they didn't in order to try and fail to get an eWin.🙂
And here I thought you had moved on from your silliness, okay then, I'll fist you some more. Your words are your words, read out your first paragraph, cos it doesn't mean what you think it means, you're saying it's acceptable if both are allowed:
Originally posted by Surtur
If people wanna shrug their shoulders over teachers banging teenage students...that's only acceptable if it applies to both sexes.U can't say the 13 yr old boy banging a female teacher is loving it but the 13 yr. old girl getting banged by a male teacher is traumatized.
I'm sure anyone here who thinks this situation is okay but who also has a daughter would be okay with her, at 13, f*cking a male teacher. Right?
Yes, I still accept that it was a typo or a brain fart or similar.
Originally posted by Robtard
And here I thought you had moved on from your silliness, okay then, I'll fist you some more. Your words are your words, read out your first paragraph, cos it doesn't mean what you think it means, you're saying it's acceptable if both are allowed:Yes, I still accept that it was a typo or a brain fart or similar.
So yeah, you're gonna pretend like you're too stupid to know what I meant.
*shrug* Okie dokie, that's a path to go, I guess. It'll get you props from the usual suspects, no doubt 👆
I think the people who would have liked to have had sex with their teachers at 13, (I'm also one of them if I'm being honest, lol.) need to ask how much of that is down to conditioning? Boys are taught to never turn down sex and all sex with females is good because they've won/conquered something. Teenage girls want the attention of their attractive teachers as much as boys but girls are sexually conditioned in a different way. I believe our conditioning influences the trauma, (perceived or otherwise), or lack thereof, of these types of sexual experiences at least in some part.
Originally posted by samhain
I think the people who would have liked to have had sex with their teachers at 13, (I'm also one of them if I'm being honest, lol.) need to ask how much of that is down to conditioning? Boys are taught to never turn down sex and all sex with females is good because they've won/conquered something. Teenage girls want the attention of their attractive teachers as much as boys but girls are sexually conditioned in a different way. I believe our conditioning influences the trauma, (perceived or otherwise), or lack thereof, of these types of sexual experiences at least in some part.
No doubt that's a factor, because if this same 13yo boy had sex with a 28yo male teacher, the outlook would far different with the "hell ya, he got some!" angle.
Surt, there are very obvious anatomical reasons why there is a massive difference between a male and a female at 13.
Also, mortality shoots up for pregnancy and birth when they are that young.
The problems and issues are not equal.
Come on, you are the first to point out that there are differences between men and women and that they are not equal. So why are they the same, now? hmm
Originally posted by dadudemon
Surt, there are very obvious anatomical reasons why there is a massive difference between a male and a female at 13.Also, mortality shoots up for pregnancy and birth when they are that young.
The problems and issues are not equal.
Come on, you are the first to point out that there are differences between men and women and that they are not equal. So why are they the same, now? hmm
Sorry when it comes to pedos The Surt don't discriminate.
Originally posted by Surtur
Sorry when it comes to pedos The Surt don't discriminate.
Physically, they are not the same. PVS is right: hormones are raging at that age.
But there are much bigger consequences for girls: mortality is one of them.
Also, at 13, I was 5'10, 145lbs-155lbs and I knew exactly what I wanted and how to accomplish those goals. I am unable to deeply relate to girls in this particular way because I never was them at that age and never will be.
I can certainly tell you what I and my fellow male friends thought at that age. We talked for ages about it. We were 3 parts nasty dogs and 1 part intelligent.
I'd want to read a girls perspective on this topic. I still don't think, at 13, most young MEN are victims. It depends on whether or not they "grew up" like I did by that age.
Originally posted by Robtard
No doubt that's a factor, because if this same 13yo boy had sex with a 28yo male teacher, the outlook would far different with the "hell ya, he got some!" angle.
Yeah, even if the kid was openly gay the attitude from most people would be more in line with the attitude if it was a 13 year old girl.
Unfortunately most people have the stance of; He's a boy, she's a woman, he must have seduced her because women don't like sex and only agree to it when manipulated in some way.
Originally posted by samhain
Yeah, even if the kid was openly gay the attitude from most people would be more in line with the attitude if it was a 13 year old girl.Unfortunately most people have the stance of; He's a boy, she's a woman, he must have seduced her because women don't like sex and only agree to it when manipulated in some way.
Absolutely would be seen as rape if it's a male/male scenario.
Which is bullshit stance to take for those people. I don't care how hard a 13yo hits on you and/or tells you they're ready, as the adult, you put a stop to it.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Physically, they are not the same. PVS is right: hormones are raging at that age.But there are much bigger consequences for girls: mortality is one of them.
Also, at 13, I was 5'10, 145lbs-155lbs and I knew exactly what I wanted and how to accomplish those goals. I am unable to deeply relate to girls in this particular way because I never was them at that age and never will be.
I can certainly tell you what I and my fellow male friends thought at that age. We talked for ages about it. We were 3 parts nasty dogs and 1 part intelligent.
I'd want to read a girls perspective on this topic. I still don't think, at 13, most young MEN are victims. It depends on whether or not they "grew up" like I did by that age.
There are different consequences for girls, but it doesn't make it any more or less okay to be banging a 13 yr. old boy. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree, I can't see either thing as okay.