Originally posted by Putinbot1
anecdotal evidence... I've seen his posts and like Rob, I disagree Mr Deflectot #1
Well you don't operate in good faith IMO. If you did you could disagree with him without calling him a Trumper. So yet again the left eats their own.
Well I'm out for the night, going out to dinner and then I have physical therapy very early tomorrow. Have a nice night 🙂
Just because something doesnt have an enormous death count doesn't mean its not a serious threat. Somethings are serious threats that we safeguard ourselves against to minimize the risk, but the threat is still there.
We have laws, agencies, task forces, that monitor and guard us against Neo nazis, white supremacists etc... To keep them in check and minimize their damage. Without such the serious threat will turn into a serious problem.
Take the lightning strikes DDM referenced earlier. Myself and basically everyone ive ever known was raised to take lightning as a serious threat. When flashing started, it was always time to get out of the pool, cancel the little league game, put the golf clubs away etc... These were the safeguards we had to protect ourselves. And like the neo nazis Without them the threat would turn into a problem with a much less favorable outcome.
I mean for example, we dont say-
Measles has only killed X amount of people in America, so the anti vax movement isnt a serious problem. (Well some do but they're nutjobs).
Its only killed so few people here because of the safeguards we have in place, ie vaccines. Sure dying of measles isnt a serious problem in our country now, but if we dont continue to safeguard ourselves against the serious threat of measles/antivax movement, the threat will become a serious problem.
Like lightning and the measles, i consider neo nazis, white supremacists etc... A serious threat/problem that we need to continue to safeguard ourselves against.
We've all seen in the past how fast things like diseses and racial supremacy can spread accrosss nations and kill countless if not kept in check.
This quote comes to mind. "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
Originally posted by Raptor22
Just because something doesnt have an enormous death count doesn't mean its not a serious threat. Somethings are serious threats that we safeguard ourselves against to minimize the risk, but the threat is still there.We have laws, agencies, task forces, that monitor and guard us against Neo nazis, white supremacists etc... To keep them in check and minimize their damage. Without such the serious threat will turn into a serious problem.
Take the lightning strikes DDM referenced earlier. Myself and basically everyone ive ever known was raised to take lightning as a serious threat. When flashing started, it was always time to get out of the pool, cancel the little league game, put the golf clubs away etc... These were the safeguards we had to protect ourselves. And like the neo nazis Without them the threat would turn into a problem with a much less favorable outcome.
I mean for example, we dont say-
Measles has only killed X amount of people in America, so the anti vax movement isnt a serious problem. (Well some do but they're nutjobs).
Its only killed so few people here because of the safeguards we have in place, ie vaccines. Sure dying of measles isnt a serious problem in our country now, but if we dont continue to safeguard ourselves against the serious threat of measles/antivax movement, the threat will become a serious problem.
Like lightning and the measles, i consider neo nazis, white supremacists etc... A serious threat/problem that we need to continue to safeguard ourselves against.
We've all seen in the past how fast things like diseses and racial supremacy can spread accrosss nations and kill countless if not kept in check.
This quote comes to mind. "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
People always learn the wrong lessons.
When Nazi Germany used propaganda on the general population, the correct, obvious response would have been to attack the institution of propaganda and public grooming itself. Ensure the public is educated to its tricks, enforce a moral/ethical code against such usage for personal/financial gain.
But no, people are fine manipulating populations, as long as it's to their benefit.
Which is all fine and dandy, until your own tricks are used against you.
Originally posted by Raptor22
Just because something doesnt have an enormous death count doesn't mean its not a serious threat. Somethings are serious threats that we safeguard ourselves against to minimize the risk, but the threat is still there.We have laws, agencies, task forces, that monitor and guard us against Neo nazis, white supremacists etc... To keep them in check and minimize their damage. Without such the serious threat will turn into a serious problem.
Take the lightning strikes DDM referenced earlier. Myself and basically everyone ive ever known was raised to take lightning as a serious threat. When flashing started, it was always time to get out of the pool, cancel the little league game, put the golf clubs away etc... These were the safeguards we had to protect ourselves. And like the neo nazis Without them the threat would turn into a problem with a much less favorable outcome.
I mean for example, we dont say-
Measles has only killed X amount of people in America, so the anti vax movement isnt a serious problem. (Well some do but they're nutjobs).
Its only killed so few people here because of the safeguards we have in place, ie vaccines. Sure dying of measles isnt a serious problem in our country now, but if we dont continue to safeguard ourselves against the serious threat of measles/antivax movement, the threat will become a serious problem.
Like lightning and the measles, i consider neo nazis, white supremacists etc... A serious threat/problem that we need to continue to safeguard ourselves against.
We've all seen in the past how fast things like diseses and racial supremacy can spread accrosss nations and kill countless if not kept in check.
This quote comes to mind. "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
If you were ranking dangers, Would you label lightning strikes and car accidents on the same level?
I can say without a doubt, that SM is not a Trump supporter lol. He's just not a snowflake leftist either. He may, in fact, be on the left but he's never appeared to be sick with TDS the way so many radical lefties are who freak out over every single thing Trump does.
And LOL@ robbie for making the insane claim that Antifa thugs are "fighting nazis" when no one acts more like actual nazis than they themselves do. The actual nazis tried (and actually succeeded) to silence their political opposition just as Antifa tries so hard to do today. Same thing goes for the left-leaning websites like twitter, Google, and You Tube.
Sorry lefties, but you will all learn the hard way that you're all on the wrong side of history. Y'all are the actual fascists. If Captain America were actually real he would not be siding with you all I guarantee it. 👆
Originally posted by Raptor22
How many levels ur using and what the difference in the levels are.If ur ranking serious threats that i need to be aware of and safeguard against vs non serious threats i dont need to worry about, id put them both on the same level.
Level 1 to 1,000
I could see rating them the same if they killed comparable numbers of people. but when one kills far more people per year. why rate them the same?
It certainly a more visible problem now. Whether that means there's more of those attitudes prevalent than the last few decades is debatable. Perhaps people with those views were always there and now there's just more opportunities for them to find one another and air their prejudices in a public forum due to certain online spaces.
What is certain is that the violence from that section of society is increasing.