When will Trump and Trumpers admit we have a White Nationalist/Supremaict problem?

White supremacist terrorism is a thing in USA. It is a pervasive threat to the US according to the FBI, apparently.

With respect to Director Wray, it appears domestic white supremacist terrorism constitutes a minority of arrests.

So....is it a serious threat?

Spoiler:
F*ck you Robtard!

Does this have anything to do with Trump?

Spoiler:
F*ck you Robtard!

/thread.

^It's_XYZ is back. How's Brexit going for you?

Originally posted by Silent Master
And?

Originally posted by Robtard
^It's_XYZ is back. How's Brexit going for you?

Originally posted by Surtur
Oh and since others wanna bring Antifa into this:

This applies to Antifa as well, correct? I can't see how you could argue we need to safeguard ourselves against one group, but not the other. Especially since I could argue Antifas increasingly violent tactics(attempted murder in some cases) could lead to actual murder if they are ignored.

So you *would* indeed apply all that to Antifa...right?

EDIT: One trend we're seeing if the crazed lunatics in Antifa show up and highly out number the "nazis" and then the "nazis" leave and Antifa just beats the shit out of randos and reporters.

Originally posted by Raptor22
not gonna lie. i dont really follow Antifas actions. If they start killing people and their threat becomes deadly i dont see why they would be a serious problem. If not i wouldn't put them on the same level as the others.

What? It does? Oh.

Erm, so what about Trump and Trumpers?

Originally posted by Blakemore
This is not a Brexit thread.

That bad, eh? Fair nough tho

Originally posted by Surtur
A tip for Rob for the future: if you're gonna discuss entire groups committing crimes context is key. I know sometimes it can ruin the narrative, but it really is necessary.

And people can talk about measles, lightning, whatever. I'm gonna talk about people and murder. It's hard to worry about 50 murders over the span of a year when in my own city we already have 5-6 times as many murders and the year isn't even over yet. And for all the talk of "people take this seriously", well...I don't see CNN town halls being done over it. I don't see hearings being held over it(they have had several about white supremacy).

So I agree with DDM: people won't admit there is a problem until it's a serious problem. Which it most certainly isn't.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/bismarcktribune.com/news/national/the-cities-with-the-highest-murder-rates-in-the-us/collection_85921a38-c5e1-5cdc-82b9-d1246c065352.amp.html

I might be coming around to this logic.

I say we should focus on cities like Chester Pennsylvania that have actual serious problems before we worry about places that dont even crack the top 20 in murder rates like Chicago that only have small problems.

Originally posted by Raptor22
and even tho it isnt the only adj that can be used, it seems to be the one the majority of the topic has been focussed on.

They seem to believe that there can only be one 'serious problem' at a time, meaning if opiate abuse is deemed a serious problem, then gang violence magically can't also be a serious problem too, cos reasons.

Which normal people know is silly; multiple problems can be of serious levels of concern.

Chicago is only 24th out of 30? Oh lordy.

Originally posted by Raptor22
and even tho it isnt the only adj that can be used, it seems to be the one the majority of the topic has been focussed on.

Yes, it's the one being used. hence my questions about it. what is your point?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes, it's the one being used. hence my questions about it. what is your point?

If you have such a problem with "serious" being used in regards to White Supremacy/Nationalism problem in the US, what better adjective/word sits well with you?

Originally posted by Raptor22
wait i though u wanted to talk about serious problems, then u start talking about little problems like the murders in Chicago. I dont see why anyone should care about that, when there are cities in America that have more than twice the amount of murders per 10k people than Chicago.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/bismarcktribune.com/news/national/the-cities-with-the-highest-murder-rates-in-the-us/collection_85921a38-c5e1-5cdc-82b9-d1246c065352.amp.html

I might be coming around to this logic.

I say we should focus on cities like Chester Pennsylvania that have actual serious problems before we worry about places that dont even crack the top 20 in murder rates like Chicago that only have small problems.

Interesting, so 60 deaths is a serious problem but over 500 is only a little problem.

Thanks for the info.

And like magic per capita and percentages doesn't matter anymore. You Trumpers really need to pick one stance and stick with it, it either matters or it does not.

If we are talking abour per capita, then the 60 deaths is even lower as it's 60 out of the entire population of the US. whereas the 500 is just out of one area of the US. Yet the 60 is being called "serious" and the 500 is called "little"

Interesting, thanks for the info.

Originally posted by Surtur
The answer to your question is: when we have an actual problem with white supremacists

✅

Originally posted by Silent Master
If we are talking abour per capita, then the 60 deaths is even lower as it's 60 out of the entire population of the US. whereas the 500 is just out of one area of the US. Yet the 60 is being called "serious" and the 500 is called "little"

Interesting, thanks for the info.

Yeah, that was.... yikes.

Robturd is discombobulated, as usual.

KMC's Trumper Squad almost in full force today, nice 👆

Got owned and now deflecting, as usual. 👆

You can pretend win like a typical Trumper; Robtard will allow it while he waits for the choice to be made. It either matters or it does not.