Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Carol smashing the Sanctuary II >>>> Any feat DCEU Superman has.Feats>>> Fanboyisms.
Carol stomps.
So going through a ship is greater than going through a ship while weakened and against tremendous resistance forces?
And why would going through a metal ship be greater than all of Superman's feats, especially when metal is tissue paper to him?
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Carol smashing the Sanctuary II >>>> Any feat DCEU Superman has.Feats>>> Fanboyisms.
Carol stomps.
LOL she put a hole in a ship, big deal. Superman put a hole in a ship too, also put a hole in another ship sized object while fighting through its gravity beam head on
Originally posted by h1a8
Superman went through a ship too.So going through a ship is greater than going through a ship while weakened and against tremendous resistance forces?
And why would going through a metal ship be greater than all of Superman's feats, especially when metal is tissue paper to him?
He’s an idiot
Originally posted by h1a8
Superman went through a ship too.So going through a ship is greater than going through a ship while weakened and against tremendous resistance forces?
And why would going through a metal ship be greater than all of Superman's feats, especially when metal is tissue paper to him?
Thanos' ship was clearly bigger and more powerful than the terraforming ship Superman destroyed.
A beam of energy? Prove that a force was being exerted on Superman.
Originally posted by relentless1
LOL she put a hole in a ship, big deal. Superman put a hole in a ship too, also put a hole in another ship sized object while fighting through its gravity beam head on
Gravity beam? Where did you got that term from? That was some sort of energy beam which was modifying the Earth's core.
The fact Superman survived at all exposure that up close to the beam is a huge feat.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Thanos' ship was clearly bigger and more powerful than the terraforming ship Superman destroyed.
Hmmm, I agree it was bigger and probably had better guns. What's that got to do with flying through it? I'm not aware that either ship has much in the way of durability feats. What reason do you have to say the hull of the ship Thanos had would be more difficult to fly through?
Originally posted by Psychotron
You do know that Superman was heavily depowered when he did that right? And it was a gravity beam, it was crushing skyscrapers on the other side fo the globe.
Is there even a thing called a gravity beam? Gravity isn't a particle, or atleast not prove to be one. Therefore a gravity beam isn't a thing. Furthermore, the movie never stated such a thing
The buildings colapsing was due to the gravity of the Earth being altered due to the ship terraforming the Earth's core, not because of the beam smashing them directly.
Originally posted by Surtur
The fact Superman survived at all exposure that up close to the beam is a huge feat.Hmmm, I agree it was bigger and probably had better guns. What's that got to do with flying through it? I'm not aware that either ship has much in the way of durability feats. What reason do you have to say the hull of the ship Thanos had would be more difficult to fly through?
There are no durability feats for either ship. However, based on impresiveness, the Santuary clearly shadows the terraforming ship.
Also, bear in mind that Zod's ship was a terraforming/scientific ship, whereas Thanos' ship was a battle station.
So, base on that concept alone, we can assume that Thanos' ship is more apt for combat.
It's a terraforming ship that would have to withstand some pretty intense gravitational forces, right? I'd agree the ship probably wouldn't be as good in combat, but it doesn't mean the ships hull is less durable.
EDIT: Also Pscyhotron was not saying the beam was directly hitting buildings on the other side of the globe. He was saying that the side effects of the beam were so powerful it was crushing buildings on the other side of the globe.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Is there even a thing called a gravity beam? Gravity isn't a particle, or atleast not prove to be one. Therefore a gravity beam isn't a thing. Furthermore, the movie never stated such a thing
No, and there's no such thing as a World Engine or an infinity gauntlet but here were are. It was a gravity beam in the movie.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
The buildings colapsing was due to the gravity of the Earth being altered due to the ship terraforming the Earth's core, not because of the beam smashing them directly.
The core was being altered by the beam... Notice that as soon as Superman destroyed the World Engine the gravity effect ceased. That means the beam was the cause of the massive gravity increase. So he overpowered a beam capable of flattening skyscrapers on the other side of the planet while being heavily depowered, and then destroyed the World Engine itself.
Originally posted by Surtur
It's a terraforming ship that would have to withstand some pretty intense gravitational forces, right? I'd agree the ship probably wouldn't be as good in combat, but it doesn't mean the ships hull is less durable.EDIT: Also Pscyhotron was not saying the beam was directly hitting buildings on the other side of the globe. He was saying that the side effects of the beam were so powerful it was crushing buildings on the other side of the globe.
The beam itself carries no weight and therefore no opposing force. The Earth's grabity smashing the buildings due to the alteration performed by the ship doesn't mean the beam carries weight.
I don't really know how strong a terraforming ship must be, but the movie makes no reference to such, and therefore any conclusion is invalid.
However, we do know that battleships must be strong enough to withstand enemy attacks, so, Thanos' dreadnought has that adv.
Originally posted by Psychotron
No, and there's no such thing as a World Engine or an infinity gauntlet but here were are. It was a gravity beam in the movie.The core was being altered by the beam... Notice that as soon as Superman destroyed the World Engine the gravity effect ceased. That means the beam was the cause of the massive gravity increase. So he overpowered a beam capable of flattening skyscrapers on the other side of the planet while being heavily depowered, and then destroyed the World Engine itself.
Yet the movie never mentioned "gravity beam", if otherwise, then bring the proof.
Altering the core doesn't translate in the beam taking force.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
The beam itself carries no weight and therefore no opposing force. The Earth's grabity smashing the buildings due to the alteration performed by the ship doesn't mean the beam carries weight.I don't really know how strong a terraforming ship must be, but the movie makes no reference to such, and therefore any conclusion is invalid.
However, we do know that battleships must be strong enough to withstand enemy attacks, so, Thanos' dreadnought has that adv.
The beam was the cause of what was happening to the buildings. Superman was in close proximity to the thing.
And yes ships meant for battle need to be able to withstand enemy attacks. Yet I still must point out we have no feats for the ship. And I agree we have no idea exactly how tough the terraforming ship would have to be. All we can say is that it would need to be tough, but that is not a feat. Both ships would have to be tough(albeit for different reasons) and both lack feats.