Originally posted by abhilegend
More like hyperbolic.
Referring to a few cracks in planets as "crumbling" is hyperbole. The total absence of planets goes into total fabrication.
And context of the Jane Thor discussion relates to Aaron's attitude toward her. Overall, he made her very powerful and formidable and did the opposite with Thor after the Gorr arc.
Originally posted by Super-fan1230I know it's a crossover.but if Superman strikes harder than Thor's hammer,why did he fail to shatter that forcefield and needed Thor's hammer to do it?
Ot:Thor , I hunk that he really did shatter planets as I believe that Aaron was trying to indicate that only in the panel of the story but Superman does strike harder than Mjolnir on a non holding back basis.
Originally posted by JBL THE GREATSuperman with Thors hammer > Superman without Thors Hammer > Thor with Thors hammer.
I know it's a crossover.but if Superman strikes harder than Thor's hammer,why did he fail to shatter that forcefield and needed Thor's hammer to do it?
Superman with Thors hammer goes absolutely nowhere towards proving Thor strikes harder.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
So Jla/Avengers doesn’t ring a bell? “The power! Never felt so— Never would have thought” huh? Lmao I keep forgetting it’s coming from you.
Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Welp...
Ure no longer making sense.. I think thats my cue. See ya.
Originally posted by JBL THE GREAT
I know it's a crossover.but if Superman strikes harder than Thor's hammer,why did he fail to shatter that forcefield and needed Thor's hammer to do it?
Originally posted by TheHulkster
Mjolnir wielded by Thor hits harder than Superman's punch.
Originally posted by JuntaiFalse. Superman without Thor's hammer and using his strength did absolutely Nothing. Superman's fist didn't shatter did it? Superman could NOT do anything or any damage. Only with the aid of thors hammer could he shatter that thing. Thor would have shattered it as well. In that book, Thor and Superman were equals backed by the fact that Superman by his own admission BARELY won, and the fact that it was stated that another fight between the two would hold a few surprises for Superman. Thats both company's way of saying the fight could go either way.
Superman with Thors hammer > Superman without Thors Hammer > Thor with Thors hammer.Superman with Thors hammer goes absolutely nowhere towards proving Thor strikes harder.
Originally posted by carver9
Easily imo. I think Thor and Superman when it comes to strength are near physical equals. When you factor in Mjlonir, yes, he hits harder imo.
Superman hits way harder than Thor does with mjolnir.
Originally posted by JBL THE GREAT
False. Superman without Thor's hammer and using his strength did absolutely Nothing. Superman's fist didn't shatter did it? Superman could NOT do anything or any damage. Only with the aid of thors hammer could he shatter that thing. Thor would have shattered it as well.
You've repeated that a thousand times now. What's your point? That Superman hits harder with mjolnir than without?
In that book, Thor and Superman were equals backed by the fact that Superman by his own admission BARELY won, and the fact that it was stated that another fight between the two would hold a few surprises for Superman. Thats both company's way of saying the fight could go either way.
Superman was using his fists, Thor was using mjolnir and yet Superman palmed Thor's best strike and knocked him out. How does he stop Thor's strike if Thor hits harder than Superman does?