Thanos and Thor vs. Superman

Started by xJLxKing11 pages

JFC

3 pages of various posters trying to change the mind of an obvious troll
Do we really have to explain how repeatedly attempting to lift from from a planet doesn't "damage" it

Once more the mods are too scared to issue warnings and bans to obvious de-railing and trolling. It's the same 2 posters doing it from one thread to another, pretending it wasn't discussed before

I thought it outright said things were different in the dimension?

Originally posted by Diesldude
Ah because he created the planet and should know how tough it is and how much it can withstand.

Evidently he doesn't.

Yup
Planets are hollow
Suns are moon sized but aren't dwarf stars

https://www.turboimagehost.com/p/44976267/SmartSelect_20191104-193741_Chrome.jpg.html

Originally posted by carver9
https://www.turboimagehost.com/p/44976267/SmartSelect_20191104-193741_Chrome.jpg.html

That's an interesting point. Someone disputed Gladiator's performance against Galactus by saying that physics are different in that realm. Why is this different?

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Evidently he doesn't.

Whats your evidence? Undrawn damage to the planet?

WF created the planet, asked superman to stay indefinitely but you know more than WF does about its stability?

Originally posted by TheHulkster
That's an interesting point. Someone disputed Gladiator's performance against Galactus by saying that physics are different in that realm. Why is this different?
because superman is from the 3ed dimension, everyone he cares about is theretjats why it's real to him. This doesn't make the 6th dimension a imaginary non existent dream. Smh.

All of this has been answered but you guys keep regurgitating these links and the same nonsense over and over again thinking that you discovered something new.

Originally posted by Diesldude
Whats your evidence? Undrawn damage to the planet?

WF created the planet, asked superman to stay indefinitely but you know more than WF does about its stability?

My evidence is that the planet is actually shown being destroyed. I'm pretty certain WF doesn't anticipate that.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
That's an interesting point. Someone disputed Gladiator's performance against Galactus by saying that physics are different in that realm. Why is this different?
Because that scan is merely stating how the third dimension works.

Jeez kids what the **** is up with you. 🤦🏻‍♂️

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Because that scan is merely stating how the third dimension works.

Jeez kids what the **** is up with you. 🤦🏻‍♂️

The first two sentences do. The rest is describing the 6th dimension, starting with the word "here".

Originally posted by TheHulkster
The first two sentences do. The rest is describing the 6th dimension, starting with the word "here".
No, he's describing exactly what the third dimension is. How can you possibly not understand that?

Originally posted by TheHulkster
The first two sentences do. The rest is describing the 6th dimension, starting with the word "here".
In your opinion, how is the 6th dimension described in that scan?

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Which of course never happens.

Of course it did.
Originally posted by TheHulkster
50 jumps (cue bringing in real world science in an effort to dispute this).

Nonsense.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
No, he's describing exactly what the third dimension is. How can you possibly not understand that?

He describes the third dimension as "where things get real. Dots and lines, simple shapes".

Then he starts his description of the 6th dimension when he says "HERE" (they are in the 6th dimension, thus, that is where "here" is) and proceeds to describe the 6th dimension. Where are you getting confused?

Originally posted by Diesldude
In your opinion, how is the 6th dimension described in that scan?

Are you asking me to quote the description or interpret it?

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Because that scan is merely stating how the third dimension works.

Jeez kids what the **** is up with you. 🤦🏻‍♂️

https://www.turboimagehost.com/p/44978337/SmartSelect_20191104-200226_Chrome.jpg.html

Originally posted by TheHulkster
He describes the third dimension as "where things get real. Dots and lines, simple shapes".

Then he starts his description of the 6th dimension when he says "HERE" (they are in the 6th dimension, thus, that is where "here" is) and proceeds to describe the 6th dimension. Where are you getting confused?

This and as stated per the scan above. It's a place beyond imagination... beyond understanding. Everything in the 6th dimension falls away.

So it's harder to destroy. Good.

Originally posted by abhilegend
So it's harder to destroy. Good.

Or easier.