Originally posted by Putinbot1
I enjoy a good troll. Always have and always will.
There are certainly times when trolling can be somewhat clever. Rarer times that they are brilliant and funny. Won’t argue with that.
But trolling by volume like what h1 does is neither brilliant nor funny. It’s just bland and uninteresting.
Either way, I don’t see the allure of it. I can perhaps appreciate the the very rare brilliantly set up or cleverly hilarious troll. But h1 is neither of those. And all due respect, TBH, can’t really remember when anyone in this site was either (I lurk the general forums waiting for a clever ah-ha moment or well set up punchline, but to no avail, trolling there has been mostly toxic, angry or just boring from both sides). At least IMO.
Perhaps there is a ratings system amongst established trolls that I am unaware of? That is certainly a possibility. If so, then perrhaps you can enlighten me how this works and what qualifies as a “good troll”? I do admit my disinterest on the whole trolling scene could be the reason why I cannot see certain possible nuances in it.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Let me see if I can explain how retarded your argument is.If you are holding 300lbs in your left hand and your right hand is holding onto a ledge. how much weight is your left hand supporting?
Your right arm is connected to your chest which is connected to your left arm. Pulling on the legde with your right arm will pull your chest closer to the ledge which helps your left arm pull something towards you.
Originally posted by h1a8H, mate, my arm is conected to my rotator cuff. I know because my tendonitis is freezing it right now.
Strawman!Your right arm is connected to your chest which is connected to your left arm. Pulling on the legde with your right arm will pull your chest closer to the ledge which helps your left arm pull something towards you.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
There are certainly times when trolling can be somewhat clever. Rarer times that they are brilliant and funny. Won’t argue with that.But trolling by volume like what h1 does is neither brilliant nor funny. It’s just bland and uninteresting.
Either way, I don’t see the allure of it. I can perhaps appreciate the the very rare brilliantly set up or cleverly hilarious troll. But h1 is neither of those. And all due respect, TBH, can’t really remember when anyone in this site was either (I lurk the general forums waiting for a clever ah-ha moment or well set up punchline, but to no avail, trolling there has been mostly toxic, angry or just boring from both sides). At least IMO.
Perhaps there is a ratings system amongst established trolls that I am unaware of? That is certainly a possibility. If so, then perrhaps you can enlighten me how this works and what qualifies as a “good troll”? I do admit my disinterest on the whole trolling scene could be the reason why I cannot see certain possible nuances in it.
I have pondered about this very subject, and have a thought of a few qualities that make a good troll, like rhetoric (how well you can sell bullshit), humor (how funny your trolling is), persona protection (never admit you're a troll and never break character), and perhaps the most important category, ragebaiting (how much you actually make people angry).
h1 is honestly not that impressive of a troll IMHO. See, no one is really butthurt by the things he says for the most part. There's very little anger. People laugh at him and think he's a retard and then proceed to taunt and troll him. They're having fun when they respond to his shitty posts. So even if he's trolling, while he's capturing attention he isn't seen as threatening enough to really piss people off.
In that regard he's sort of like a poor man's quanchi. Quan is similarly a low-effort volume poster troll, but has a level of aggression that actually manages to piss people off. Mostly stupid people mind you, but still.
Originally posted by NemeBro
I have pondered about this very subject, and have a thought of a few qualities that make a good troll, like rhetoric (how well you can sell bullshit), humor (how funny your trolling is), persona protection (never admit you're a troll and never break character), and perhaps the most important category, ragebaiting (how much you actually make people angry).h1 is honestly not that impressive of a troll IMHO. See, no one is really butthurt by the things he says for the most part. There's very little anger. People laugh at him and think he's a retard and then proceed to taunt and troll him. They're having fun when they respond to his shitty posts. So even if he's trolling, while he's capturing attention he isn't seen as threatening enough to really piss people off.
In that regard he's sort of like a poor man's quanchi. Quan is similarly a low-effort volume poster troll, but has a level of aggression that actually manages to piss people off. Mostly stupid people mind you, but still.
Tbh only bias or stupid people think I troll when in actuality I actually debate (dont ignore evidence that is brought to my attention, always address someone's points, etc).
If someone state something you disagree with then you post a rebuttal. Debating is simple.
People who refuse to debate the proper way are the trolls.
Originally posted by NemeBroWho can create the most rage on these forums in your opinion Neme?
I have pondered about this very subject, and have a thought of a few qualities that make a good troll, like rhetoric (how well you can sell bullshit), humor (how funny your trolling is), persona protection (never admit you're a troll and never break character), and perhaps the most important category, ragebaiting (how much you actually make people angry).h1 is honestly not that impressive of a troll IMHO. See, no one is really butthurt by the things he says for the most part. There's very little anger. People laugh at him and think he's a retard and then proceed to taunt and troll him. They're having fun when they respond to his shitty posts. So even if he's trolling, while he's capturing attention he isn't seen as threatening enough to really piss people off.
In that regard he's sort of like a poor man's quanchi. Quan is similarly a low-effort volume poster troll, but has a level of aggression that actually manages to piss people off. Mostly stupid people mind you, but still.