Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Not sure or cant recall .53 hercs is about.Wbh and .21 as in the power of wishing well on him?
Anyways, i think he was basically spelling it out when pak coined the term herc. There was no need to even give it this term, not even remotely unless u are taking something(strength/power) that is defining from said character(Hercules) and applying it to other threats however nonsensical it looks, if u didnt mean to portray it so outwardly like pak did.
I literally posted it on the page twice now for you.
Hercs have NOTHING to do with physical force.
Reposting (so now, a third time):
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
So apparently, we are meant to believe that someone with 0.53 Hercs:Can be easily restrained by a human:
A human? Yes, as Strange says:
We are meant to believe that Fin Fang Foom, a guy who BEFORE he was amped, was already a threat to Hulk, and despite being SIGNIFICANTLY amped....
....was still *only* 17 Hercs:
And most importantly....THIS Hulk:
Wasn't even 1 Herc:
Apparently, according to Carver, Monica Rappacini is almost TWICE as powerful as AMPED WBH, lmao.
And Jennifer, stuck in her human form, restrained her.
Hercs have ZERO relation to physical power. Saying something is 133.45 Hercs doesn't mean its 133.45 times Herc's strongest physical punch, unless someone wants to make the case that Monica has almost twice the force of amped WBH.
Edit: I say zero, but it is a bit related - the more Hercules exerts himself, the more he radiates. But it's not the actual force from his punch. Its the energy he's radiating that's being measured. Celey, Pak was clear in this. Its the radiation that's being measured, NOT THE FORCE OF THE PUNCH. People forget that.