Trigger warning Tim Pool video:
Nancy Pelosi Is Fake News Trends After She Dismisses Iran Protests While Iran Is SHOOTING Its People
Trigger warning Tim Pool video:
Nancy Pelosi Is Fake News Trends After She Dismisses Iran Protests While Iran Is SHOOTING Its People
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Oh also im curious IYO which of these constitutes a terrorist attacks. As that seems to be the rhetoric that this guy was some big time terrorist.
"the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."
Which of those things on the list do not meet the definition?
And do you *not* feel he is a terrorist?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Oh, yes, the proxy thing. Both literal and technical proxies: they use them both.Iran is NOT a good country. HOWEVERRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Many do not like the US having their imperialistic fingers dipped into all the Middle Eastern countries. Why don't we just...completely withdraw from Afghanistan all the way to Israel? Just pull out of all of it. And protect our borders, domestically? Thoughts?
Mexico is a much bigger threat to Murika then the middle east atm, those cartels are brutal.
Originally posted by dadudemon
So Iran shot that plane down because of Trump-stuff even though they can easily check the flight destination and probably passenger manifest to see who is on the plane?Riiiiiiiiight.
Or Iran made a mistake like they just admitted earlier today. So when do we decide Iran is lying and when they are telling the truth again? I can't tell because the Mainstream, TDS, Media is so psychotic that I can't tell what truth I'm suppose to be believing at the moment.
Not sure what this has to do with Pete Buttigeig's benign post?
You should look at the points yourself. What could Iran have to gain from doing this intentionally? The Pentagon is backing the "accident" angle. Accidents like this have happened before, so it's not unheard of. They were at high alert due to US-Iran conflict.
Personally and to repeat myself. The accident angle is very plausible here. But a small part of me thinks Russia ordered Iran to shoot down the Ukrainian plane as an F-U to Ukraine and to sow unrest.
Originally posted by Robtard
Not sure what this has to do with Pete Buttigeig's benign post?You should look at the points yourself. What could Iran have to gain from doing this intentionally? The Pentagon is backing the "accident" angle. Accidents like this have happened before, so it's not unheard of. They were at high alert due to US-Iran conflict.
Personally and to repeat myself. The accident angle is very plausible here. But a small part of me thinks Russia ordered Iran to shoot down the Ukrainian plane as an F-U to Ukraine and to sow unrest.
You pretty much respond to yourself with what I would say, anyway. So I think there's no need for me to say anything.
Originally posted by Robtard
Well no, I posed an important question you should ask yourself. But okay.
I don't need to. You answered it.
Originally posted by Robtard
"Not sure what this has to do with Pete Buttigeig's benign post?"
Originally posted by Petey
"Innocent civilians are now dead because they were caught in the middle of an unnecessary and unwanted military *** for tat. My thoughts are with the families and loved ones of all 176 souls lost aboard this flight."
Originally posted by Petey
What could Iran have to gain from doing this intentionally? The Pentagon is backing the "accident" angle. Accidents like this have happened before, so it's not unheard of. They were at high alert due to US-Iran conflict.Personally and to repeat myself. The accident angle is very plausible here.
Oh my. Pete's statement is solely focused on those that died and yes, from their relatives and loved ones point of view, people who had nothing to do with any conflict are dead because they were at the wrong place at the wrong time. He's consoling the families of those that lost people.
He may just be playing the politics game and doesn't care about those who died, I don't know, as I can't see into his heart/mind like you apparently can. But he's not wrong there.
Originally posted by Robtard
Oh my. Pete's statement is solely focused on those that died and yes, from their relatives and loved ones point of view, people who had nothing to do with any conflict are dead because they were at the wrong place at the wrong time. He's consoling the families of those that lost people.He may just be playing the politics game and doesn't care about those who died, I don't know, as I can't see into his heart/mind like you apparently can. But he's not wrong there.
Nope "My thoughts are with the families and loved ones of all 176 souls lost aboard this flight." is what he should have said if this was just about consoling the families. He couldn't merely do that though, he had to imply the US(and therefore Trump) was partially to blame.
Originally posted by Surtur
"the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."Which of those things on the list do not meet the definition?
And do you *not* feel he is a terrorist?
Before I answer that, whats the meaning of civilian in that context? I assume its a non-combatant?
Take feelings out of it for a sec and just explain why this guy fits the definition of terrorist. Trust me it will be a good exercise for you.
Originally posted by Silent Master
It wasn't an accident, Iran fully intended to shoot it down, they were just "wrong" about it being a US drone.At best, That makes it a mistake rather than an accident.
So they were clearly not intending to shoot down a commercial airline. Glad everyone agrees.
Also glad Iran has admitted wrong doing and that theres no excuse/justification for what they did.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Before I answer that, whats the meaning of civilian in that context? I assume its a non-combatant?Take feelings out of it for a sec and just explain why this guy fits the definition of terrorist. Trust me it will be a good exercise for you.
You already answered. Your last two sentences practically scream that your opinion is "if you take feelings out of this he's not a terrorist".
And the meaning of civilians could be "non-combatant" but I will note it said "especially civilians". It is not saying acts of terrorism can only be carried out on civilians.
So yes, he has committed acts that fall under the definition of terrorism IMO. You clearly feel otherwise so just explain why.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
So they were clearly not intending to shoot down a commercial airline. Glad everyone agrees.Also glad Iran has admitted wrong doing and that theres no excuse/justification for what they did.
They only admitted wrong doing when it became clear that nobody was buying their attempt to cover it up.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
So they were clearly not intending to shoot down a commercial airline. Glad everyone agrees.Also glad Iran has admitted wrong doing and that theres no excuse/justification for what they did.
He's trying to time-waster-troll you, just what SM does. When people say "accident", they don't mean that some Iranian slipped on a piece of halva that some other slob dropped and unintentionally hit the 'fire missile button' when trying to catch himself.
The "accident" was attacking a commercial airliner, when they somehow thought it was something else.