Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
The mutilation and suffering only make Dark Siders stronger. It fuels their powers.TCW Maul > TPM Maul
Vader > Ani
I'm not disputing that. I just don't think that Maul's hatred, as much as it fueled him, is a match for how much more powerful Kenobi became.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
I actually thought you made a good point about Maul being a sycophant for 10+years whilst Kenobi was getting better and better, given they are actually around the same age.That said, depends when you think their respective peaks are, but certainly late in the Clone Wars, I see no evidence for there being some kind of huge gap between them. And in a direct fight in that period, Maul would likely have the psychological advantage of having murdered Satine in front of Obi.
Not quite that simple.
Especially for Maul who was out of action for many years.
Any psychological advantage Maul had kinda vanished after that first encounter, I think. I mean, look at what Kenobi did to Savage and Maul together.
I'm not saying the gulf between them was massive in the CW era, but I still think there was a legitimate barrier between them. Like, if Kenobi was a 9, Maul would be at best an 8.
I'd take Rebels Kenobi over any version of Maul, but I know how you feel about that fight so I won't rub it in too hard 😛
Originally posted by ozz81
Sweet makes it clearer, sorry just thought i will ask as i wasnt to sure in the star wars cannon cartoons how does Obi Wan actually defeat Maul , maul tries to do the same attack he did to obi on qui gon jin but then all i see is obi slashing his light saber handle in half then maul falls down and dies slowly etc : i didnt quite get that or did obi wans saber slash Maul somehow ?
Kenobi slashed straight down through the lightsaber and through Maul's torso. It was meant to look like a samurai killing someone in one deft stroke. That and they probably didn't want to show a huge gaping wound on what was the kiddiest kids show SW has produced.