Coronavirus

Started by Klaw504 pages
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
^^this really needs more commies

durwank

Hmm, professional doctor, or Chinese bat farmer. Which bacteria do you want?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Would rather take my chances with possible long term effects of the vaccine (made by medical experts), than those potentially caused by Covid.

Also funny we all started buying mobile phones before long term effects of carrying those everywhere were tested for 10 years. Yet people seem to be more worried about a vaccine made by medical experts.

Seth McFarlane made jokes all the time about cell phones causing cancer, think he carries a phone now? 😂

For like the 900th time already, survival rate for covid is over 99%.

So yeah, I'd much rather rely on getting enough vitamins, minerals, and exercise to keep my immune system in good condition to fight covid rather than taking my chances with a highly dangerous experimental vaccine.

Taking the jab is like playing russian roulette. I'll pass.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
For like the 900th time already, survival rate for covid is over 99%.

So yeah, I'd much rather rely on getting enough vitamins, minerals, and exercise to keep my immune system in good condition to fight covid rather than taking my chances with a highly dangerous experimental vaccine.

Taking the jab is like playing russian roulette. I'll pass.

😂 😆 😂 😆

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
For like the 900th time already, survival rate for covid is over 99%.

So yeah, I'd much rather rely on getting enough vitamins, minerals, and exercise to keep my immune system in good condition to fight covid rather than taking my chances with a highly dangerous experimental vaccine.

Taking the jab is like playing russian roulette. I'll pass.

That's very good of you. 🙂

You know when children go to chicken pox parties to build their immune system? You have yourself a COVID party! Build up that immune system!

Originally posted by Insane Titan
lie all you want it makes little difference to me. You flat out lying about what’s stated plain as day as adverse reaction on the government website just to try and score point based on your political stance shows how weak minded you are.

As I said already, Rob and other leftists have been programmed to never question the safety and effectiveness of these covid "vaccines".

They just take big pharma, Bill Gates, and Fauci's word that they are totally safe without questioning it. Poor fools actually think the vaccine makers care about them smh.

Originally posted by Newjak
😂 😆 😂 😆

😆 😂 😆 😂

I love the hypocrisy of people that in one breath say "the chance of covid killing me is so low, it's no big deal" and then turn around and go "what, there's a 0.00001% the vaccine could cause serious illness? well, that's too big a risk for me".

Like, ****ing hell lads. You wanna question vaccines and their safety? Fine. But don't pretend they're not the much, much lesser evil at the very worst.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Completely and utterly false.

In the UK our infection rate is massively higher than at the peak of our 3rd wave yet we still only have about 1/9 of the daily death count that we had then.

That massively lower death count is obviously only due to the vaccine.

And before you say "oh but why are cases so much higher", that's also obvious - we don't have restrictions or lockdowns anymore.

Its not obvious at all. They show the ''death statistics'' and then add the small print...''died within 28 days of a positive test' That offers absolutely no clarity at all. Its just false information and the statistics are clearly manipulated to suit the agenda they are pushing. So yeah I don't take a blind bit of notice to a mainstream media and corrupt government who are obviously trying to manipulate you. Sorry

I know a few nurses who work in different major hospitals across the Midlands and they have never been busy or overrun. Its all a load of rubbish. A women was arrested for taking a video in Worcester hospital proving it was completely empty. This was during the height of the 'pandemic'.

The fact is you have a 99.5% chance of surviving covid and will have mild symptoms at best. Flu like symptoms at worst. Unless you are over 70 and or have major underlying health conditions you just don't have to worry.

Use your common sense and look around you. Where is the pandemic? I don't know a single person who has died from covid, nor do i know anyone who knows anyone! And yet i know one of my family members is dead from the vaccine and another one on tablets the rest of his life due to clotting on the lung. The number of vaccine injuries I'm hearing about is staggering, and that's just the short term effects. The media are hiding everything about it. Do your research.

If you really thing this is a pandemic i have some sea front property in Birmingham you might like to buy

https://vernoncoleman.org/videos/proof-covid-19-jabs-should-be-stopped-now

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
For like the 900th time already, survival rate for covid is over 99%.

So yeah, I'd much rather rely on getting enough vitamins, minerals, and exercise to keep my immune system in good condition to fight covid rather than taking my chances with a highly dangerous experimental vaccine.

Taking the jab is like playing russian roulette. I'll pass.

Here in the uk is stated as the survival rate of 98.2% of nhs website and average age of covid death is 82yrs old which is also average life expectancy.

Like the Isreal mass study shows from a population of 90% double jabbed and 2/3rds of that booster jabbed natural immunity came back measuring between 6-13 times stronger than any vaccine. Why people choose to ignore such things just to score political points is stupid AF.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I love the hypocrisy of people that in one breath say "the chance of covid killing me is so low, it's no big deal" and then turn around and go "what, there's a 0.00001% the vaccine could cause serious illness? well, that's too big a risk for me".

Like, ****ing hell lads. You wanna question vaccines and their safety? Fine. But don't pretend they're not the much, much lesser evil at the very worst.

So you think nearly 2.5 million adverse reactions alone in the uk to the vaccines is safe? Natural immunity is 6-13 times better than any vaccine as the mass Isreal study conclusively shows.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
so you didn’t actually look then. As I said it gives you a folder to open with each vaccine and how many deaths and adverse reactions each has had.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

I asked you for proof, you told me to go ahead and look for it instead of just posting it and then you have a problem when I didn't find exactly what you wanted? Why not just post the proof that you've already read? Odd that.

Anyhow, in the first folder it has small amount of people who suffered conditions after the second does and an even smaller number of that number died, but it's not 100% sure if it was a reaction to the vaccine. Though logic does tell us that there's going to be a very small percentage of the population who will have adverse reactions to any vaccine.

They also clearly note this which you for some reason did not take into account:

"Based on age-stratified all-cause mortality in England and Wales taken from the Office for National Statistics death registrations, several thousand deaths are expected to have occurred, naturally, within 7 days of the many millions of doses of vaccines administered so far, mostly in the elderly." -snip

"Usage of the vaccines has increased over the course of the campaigns and as such, so has reporting of fatal events with a temporal association with vaccination. However, this does not indicate a link between vaccination and the fatalities reported. Review of individual reports and patterns of reporting does not suggest the vaccines played a role in these deaths." -snip

So maybe you should be reading it closer.

I'd also like to point out that the testing they use to determine if a person has covid is known for giving frequent false positives. The creator of the PCR test has said it was never intended to determine if someone has covid or not.

Also, another way they deceive the public is they frequently don't officially count someone as being vaccinated until like 14 days after they get the jab. So if someone gets the jab and they soon afterward experience an adverse reaction and get put in hospital or they even die before 14 days expires then it is counted as an "unvaccinated" cause.

Originally posted by Robtard
I asked you for proof, you told me to go ahead and look for it instead of just posting it and then you have a problem when I didn't find exactly what you wanted? Why not just post the proof that you've already read? Odd that.

Anyhow, in the first folder it has small amount of people who suffered conditions after the second does and an even smaller number of that number died, but it's not 100% sure if it was a reaction to the vaccine. Though logic does tell us that there's going to be a very small percentage of the population who will have adverse reactions to any vaccine.

They also clearly note this which you for some reason did not take into account:

"Based on age-stratified all-cause mortality in England and Wales taken from the Office for National Statistics death registrations, several thousand deaths are expected to have occurred, naturally, within 7 days of the many millions of doses of vaccines administered so far, mostly in the elderly." -snip

"Usage of the vaccines has increased over the course of the campaigns and as such, so has reporting of fatal events with a temporal association with vaccination. [b]However, this does not indicate a link between vaccination and the fatalities reported. Review of individual reports and patterns of reporting does not suggest the vaccines played a role in these deaths." -snip

So maybe you should be reading it closer. [/B]

Because I knew you would flat out lie which you just have again.

The first folder about the vaccine broken down by each make. The Pfizer vaccine is the first one which shows over 35,000 adverse reactions and 576 deaths.

And that is just the last page of a 100 page document on the primer jab Moderna and Astra Zenica all have similar length documents along with a third part unspecified jab

"Usage of the vaccines has increased over the course of the campaigns and as such, so has reporting of fatal events with a temporal association with vaccination. However, this does not indicate a link between vaccination and the fatalities reported. Review of individual reports and patterns of reporting does not suggest the vaccines played a role in these deaths." -snip

While in the UK, over 140K have died of covid.

Millions have taken the Pzifer in the UK, if only less than 600 died from a direct link (and that's questionable), that's not a negative. Covid has am immensely much higher chance of harming or killing you statistically speaking.

Let's just straight up compare the vaccine to the virus.

Deaths per infection of virus vs. deaths per reactions to vaccines
Number of illnesses from virus per capita vs. number of adverse reactions to vaccinated per capita/total vaccinated
Chances of vaccinated people getting virus vs. chances of a COVID survivor getting infected again

Then we'd have a clear statistical analysis of which is safer.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I love the hypocrisy of people that in one breath say "the chance of covid killing me is so low, it's no big deal" and then turn around and go "what, there's a 0.00001% the vaccine could cause serious illness? well, that's too big a risk for me".

Like, ****ing hell lads. You wanna question vaccines and their safety? Fine. But don't pretend they're not the much, much lesser evil at the very worst.

It's mind boggling.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
😆 😂 😆 😂
😂 😆 😂 😆