Originally posted by Raptor22
@nibMy statement from pg63 of this thread- "Fyi ive already explained in this thread why analogies identical to yours are faulty."
This was in response to an anology by ddm nearly identical to all of yours from pg60-
"To make it a closer analogy it would be like lying and saying drinking water could save your life form a deadly virus thats sweepimg the nation where the majority of the country is scarred shitless, but no one can get water (the thing our president falsely told us is safe and can save us) but they can get ice."
Its pretty obvious that ur analogies lacked the crucial depth and detail necessary to depict the actual situation.
Instead of looking yourself or asking decently, u refused, shouted in all caps, called me a liar, accused me of tds, and implied i was a coward by repeatedly accusing me of running away because i refused to engage in ur bz for ban challenge. Even after ur "were all in isolation" comments and i made it clear to u that i wasn't and i didnt have time, u continued ur schtick.
Even tho u were the one who brought up things like tds and available time first, somehow i was a troll who was distracting from the topic or bragging even tho my comments were in direct response to things u brought up.
Its a shame that this entire debacle was the product of nothing more than ur baseless assumptions and pissy child like attitude.
facepalm
FYI, when you claim to refute someone’s argument and that the refutation is somewhere in the thread, the person is really only obliged to look as far as the argument in question that you claimed was refuted. That is because a refutation is assumed to happen AFTER an argument is made. -_-
He is not obliged to comb thru a 60+ thread. Especially when you made 1) no reference of how far exactly I have to look 2) Wasn’t even a reply to me or my post 3) referred to a reply I already covered w/o the use of an analogy (thus it was something I would not be inclined to look back to). 4) Does NOT provide an explanation on why analogies like mine were faulty (like you claimed you provided and is what I was asking for).
You just made your own analogy and claimed it was the closest one. But even here, you are wrong. Your analogy is lacking. Because while it does demonstrate the way one item can have 2 forms, it is only half-accurate as you forgot to showcase what can happen due to improper usage.
Which is actually the important part. Because that is the CAUSE of the damage you want to attribute to Trump. And w/c is why my analogies are so much better than yours.
Everything becomes dangerous when you use them incorrectly. Ppl who start swallowing giant cubes of ice and ending up choking from them is STILL not Trump’s fault no matter how much he much he praises the life-saving qualities of water vs a virus.
These ppl used the wrong thing, the wrong way against both common sense, reason and probably even professional advice (like the do not drink label in the damned fish tank cleaner). Them hurting themselves is on them. We are each responsible for our own actions regardless of how much you might wanna blame someone you don’t like for it. Again, IF you really wanna blame someone, blame Darwin.
You just wasted both our time (causing us to do a pointless back and forth) on a weak easily refutable reply that you could have easily pointed out if you weren’t trying so hard to be a smartass (but like your analogy you only managed to go halfway. You were an ass, yes. But smart? Nah.).
That was h1 level dumb. W/c is quite an accomplishment. I give you permission to humble-brag about this one. This is the correct forum after all.