Originally posted by FrothByte
Ok. Do you want to organize the BZ or should I?
Do you agree to a single post BZ? I think we have debated this for too long now.
A single post outlining our arguments, to be sent to a neutral party for him to post both arguments in the BZ thread. We pick 3 judges.
Sounds good?
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Science>>> h1I know you are pretty retarded when physics comes to bear, but honestly! You can't read now?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blunt_trauma
You don't get to make up science! Definition of a term>>> Your understanding of a term.
2. Yeah, in the scene, where Hulk is standing on top of Surtur's crown, it's clear that Surtur's face is much bigger than the Hulk!
3. Concession accepted. Except I never said that Surtur was being lifted, nor that the force requiered to move Surtur was bigger than the one requiered to lift him.
I said that it's plain out stupid to pretend than lifting a building is a greater feat of strength than moving a 10x bigger object!
4. Hulkbuster hit Hulk many more times than Thanos did. That's more than enough to show that Thanos' punches>>> Hulkbuster's.
5. Surtur is a solid. If Surtur was made of the exact same composition or one less dense than a person's, then the Hulk would have smashed his face! It's pretty obvious that Surtur is way denser.
1. What does injury definitions have to do with anything? A blunt force attack can penetrate or not. The fact that it did penetrate does not change the fact that it was a blunt force attack. We are discussing the whether durability of blunt force scales to cutting force. You are confusing the issue.
2. I stated that Surtur's head was only a few times bigger. This contradicts the size you believe Surtur was.
3. I wasn't talking about lifting vs hitting back. I was talking about the fact that you are assuming mass and acceleration when you are trying to prove it.
4. Hulk buster hit Hulk with a lot of baby jab hits. It did not hit Hulk in vital areas like Thanos did. Also it did not hit Hulk in succession as Thanos did. Hulk was able to recover due to the time between hits. You have to address ALL OF THIS. Picking and choosing what parts you want to address and parts you want to ignore IS TROLLING.
5. Again, density and toughness are not the same thing. Superman is as dense
As a human but solid steel is like tissue paper to him.
Originally posted by h1a8
1. What does injury definitions have to do with anything? A blunt force attack can penetrate or not. The fact that it did penetrate does not change the fact that it was a blunt force attack. We are discussing the whether durability of blunt force scales to cutting force. You are confusing the issue.2. I stated that Surtur's head was only a few times bigger. This contradicts the size you believe Surtur was.
3. I wasn't talking about lifting vs hitting back. I was talking about the fact that you are assuming mass and acceleration when you are trying to prove it.
4. Hulk buster hit Hulk with a lot of baby jab hits. It did not hit Hulk in vital areas like Thanos did. Also it did not hit Hulk in succession as Thanos did. Hulk was able to recover due to the time between hits. You have to address ALL OF THIS. Picking and choosing what parts you want to address and parts you want to ignore IS TROLLING.
5. Again, density and toughness are not the same thing. Superman is as dense
As a human but solid steel is like tissue paper to him.
1 No, the durabilily of you cutting something with a sword doesn't scale to the durability of you hammering the samething.
There are different factors embedded in such interactions, just like the several sites I've posted show.
Your comprenhension of reality doesn't translate into science, at least not in this planet nor in the known universe.
2. Only a "few times". If you mean that 10x is a "few times" then we agree.
3. Okay, I completely lost you on this point.
4. Vital points? Do you even know the definition of that?
Either way, samething could apply for this case.
Thanos would hit Doomsday way better than Superman would ever do.
5. Won't continue with something that anyone with a sense of logic would comprenhend!
Surtur》》》Building.
Originally posted by Lestov16
Pretty sure that Thanos will die here. The moment he lands a hit on Doomsday, DD will adapt to his strength and beat him senseless. Non-IG Thanos' best feat is going toe-to-toe with Hulk, and it is HIGHLY ARGUABLE whether MCU Hulk is stronger than DCEU Supes.
Is it though? DCEU DD doesn't seem to "adapt". Sure, he seems invulnerable to most stuff and has regenerative abilities, but that's pretty much it.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Is it though? DCEU DD doesn't seem to "adapt". Sure, he seems invulnerable to most stuff and has regenerative abilities, but that's pretty much it.
Are you serious dawg? Dat nigga Doomsday adapted to A NUCLEAR EXPLOSION. Sounds like you're trying to downplay DD's abilities.
Also, even if DD is merely "invulnerable" to nukes, that is still a better durability feat than anything Thanos has shown (especially considering how Thanos' entire army got wiped out by a nuke in the first Avengers movie)
Originally posted by Silent Master
Not saying this will happen, but given that DD grew a spike rather than regenerating a hand when WW cut off his off. what do you think would happen if an opponent cut off his head.
lol you read my mind. DD didnt show true regeneration. He regenerated a bone spike where his hand was.
Cut enough of him and it will be a pile of bone spikes on the floor.