Originally posted by FrothByte
Only an idiot would think being able to block fast equates to being able to attack fast.So, are you an idiot or will you provide a feat of her actually striking with her sword at superspeed against a skilled opponent?
Only an idiot wouldn't think that being able to block fast does not equate to attacking fast.
Its called arm movement.
Also speed to attack is always greater than speed to defend.
Originally posted by h1a8
You are forgetting perception speed.Only an idiot wouldn't think that being able to block fast does not equate to attacking fast.
Its called arm movement.Also speed to attack is always greater than speed to defend.
LoL. And again you display how utterly ignorant you are at fighting. Attack speed is always greater than speed to defend?
What bullshit. You do realize that in order to attack someone you need to actually cover a greater amount of distance and make a bigger movement than you'd need to defend yourself right?
But then, what was I expecting from a guy who thinks all you need to attack is arm movement?
In any case, unless you actually have a feat where WW speedblitzes a skilled opponent and one-shot kills them then you're just making stuff up.
So I ask again: are you an idiot or will you actually provide a feat to back your claim?
Originally posted by FrothByte
LoL. And again you display how utterly ignorant you are at fighting. Attack speed is always greater than speed to defend?1. What bullshit. You do realize that in order to attack someone you need to actually cover a greater amount of distance and make a bigger movement than you'd need to defend yourself right?
2. But then, what was I expecting from a guy who thinks all you need to attack is arm movement?
In any case, unless you actually have a feat where WW speedblitzes a skilled opponent and one-shot kills them then you're just making stuff up.
So I ask again: are you an idiot or will you actually provide a feat to back your claim?
1. Exactly! You just proved my point. To attack you must cover a larger distance than to defend. Therefore attack speed is greater. For example, a punch can be thrown at 40mph but a block at 15-20mph in order to defend.
But on a common sense level, swinging a sword would produce more velocity than getting your hand up to block.
2. When two characters are in striking distance then yes, all you need is arm movement.
Originally posted by h1a8
1. Exactly! You just proved my point. To attack you must cover a larger distance than to defend. Therefore attack speed is greater. For example, a punch can be thrown at 40mph but a block at 15-20mph in order to defend.
But on a common sense level, swinging a sword would produce more velocity than getting your hand up to block.2. When two characters are in striking distance then yes, all you need is arm movement.
1. Thank you for admitting that you can't use a defense speed feat as an attack speed feat because they're different.
2. If you truly think arm speed is the only thing you need for a fast attack (regardless if you're in striking distance) then you truly know nothing about fighting.
Anyway, I'm done debating with you since you're clearly trolling. Let me know once you're ready to back your arguments up with actual feats like the rest of the posters here do.
P.S. - since you didn't provide proof, I take that as your concession that you are an idiot.
Originally posted by FrothByte
1. Thank you for admitting that you can't use a defense speed feat as an attack speed feat because they're different.2. If you truly think arm speed is the only thing you need for a fast attack (regardless if you're in striking distance) then you truly know nothing about fighting.
Anyway, I'm done debating with you since you're clearly trolling. Let me know once you're ready to back your arguments up with actual feats like the rest of the posters here do.
P.S. - since you didn't provide proof, I take that as your concession that you are an idiot.
1. You and I both proved that defense speed is slower (velocity wise) than attack speed. Therefore WW attacks faster than she can defend.
At this point you are trolling. This isn't a court of Law. We use common sense here. Clearly you can swing your arm with faster velocity in an attack than trying to block. That's the end of that debate. You can continue the stupidness if you want, I won't engage it.
2. It all scales idiot. I can't believe you are trolling and arguing that WW has no ability to attack with superspeed. This debate is also finished.