MCU Hela vs DCEU Superman

Started by Adam Grimes12 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
You concede to quickly.
Who's quickly?

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Who's quickly?
You forfeited as always.

I feel like Superman more or less has all the time in the world to attempt to remove her head from her body.

I think that Hela pretty much takes it, she can use her blades and put Superman down quickly. Her mjolnir feat gives her the raw strenght advantage.

Originally posted by Surtur
I feel like Superman more or less has all the time in the world to attempt to remove her head from her body.

Sounds like something Supermurder-man would do.

Originally posted by Surtur
I feel like Superman more or less has all the time in the world to attempt to remove her head from her body.
If you want to make shit up like your career by all means.

Originally posted by Darthvaderrocks
I think that Hela pretty much takes it, she can use her blades and put Superman down quickly. Her mjolnir feat gives her the raw strenght advantage.

You know that she would be a statue to Superman right? Just like WW was.
Are you new here?

Originally posted by h1a8
Are you new here?

😆

Hela appeared to be more durable, and harder to beat than Thanos, and he had the infinity gauntlet with him. Superman was out smarted by Batman, and almost died in the process, got killed by Doomsday, was stunned by a head butt from Wonder woman, and taken down by an explosion from the mother box. The only time Hela went down was when Satur came back. It took a powerful demon god to take her down. Which is saying that Superman interms of power and durability, regardless his speed, will loose in the end, should these two fight. Speed is a lot, but it isn't anything if you can't hurt your opponent.

She was so durable that random asgardians could pierce her with blades lmao.

Just the same as a Kryptonian can impale, hurt or even kill Superman. Not one time was any of them attacking her a threat of stopping her. To be impaled, not skip a beat, and continue to hand out ass whippings, is more than I can say for Supes. He died when he got impaled remember. They had to pet cemetery him back to life. So yes she has shown to be more durable then he him.

And Hela's blades >>>> Doomsdays arm by a wide margin in feats

Did you guys even watch the movie? Lol

Superman was severely weakened by the Kryptonite spear by the time Doomsday managed to impale him. Better luck on your next try.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Did you guys even watch the movie? Lol

Superman was severely weakened by the Kryptonite spear by the time Doomsday managed to impale him. Better luck on your next try.

It doesn't matter he was still shown to be vulnerable. He wasn't exposed to Kryptonite when he was head butt by WW or flatten by the mother box. Those two attacks were able to hurt him, and he seen them coming. Actually prepared himself for the mother box explosion and still couldn't take it. Sorry, but he's not more durable, powerful or more experienced in a fight compare to Hela.

Too bad he is more durable and powerful than her.

And why is getting floored by the motherbox, a device packing planetary forces, a low showing? Lol

It's a low showing because Cyborg took the same so call planetary blast as Superman did. Keep in mind none of the blast blew cyborg apart, but Steppinwolf was able to pull him apart with ease. Which tells me the blast couldn't of been on a planetary scale because Wolf didn't pull him apart with planetary strength, therefore the box couldn't of been packing that much blow back, but yet it still made Superman wish he was still in the grave. Not one time did you see Hela vulnerable until end when she faced Sutur. Face it fanboy Superman is out of his league

Or it could have been a high end feat for Cyborg considering what Superman has already endured.

Do I have to explain everything to you? Lol

Superman has never had his skin broken without kryptonite in play.

He's arguably never had his skin so much as blemished without it in play, considering the very short downtime between his initial fight with Doomsday up to getting hit by the nuke and the fight with Batman before where he was exposed to Kryptonite several times without being able to gain any juice from sunlight in the interim. BvS has the only moments where Superman has so much as a scratch on him.

Also, really skeevy of this heru dude to run away from my rebuttals and then to post in this thread weeks later like nothing happened. Almost as cowardly as sleeping with your middle aged girlfriend's barely legal daughter.

He's weird.

Originally posted by heru
It doesn't matter he was still shown to be vulnerable. He wasn't exposed to Kryptonite when he was head butt by WW or flatten by the mother box. Those two attacks were able to hurt him, and he seen them coming. Actually prepared himself for the mother box explosion and still couldn't take it. Sorry, but he's not more durable, powerful or more experienced in a fight compare to Hela.

Why can't WW's headbutt be a good feat for her? Why can't an unknown motherbox have a good feat? Why do you assume those are bad feats for Superman?

The problem is that hurting Superman is not the same as penetrating his skin.
It can be argued that Hela's blades can't even break Superman's skin. But that argument isn't need since Superman won't be touched by Hela if he doesn't want to be.