Shade vs Starbrand
who wins
https://dc.fandom.com/wiki/Richard_Swift_(New_Earth)
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Kevin_Connor_(Earth-616)
Shade vs Starbrand
who wins
https://dc.fandom.com/wiki/Richard_Swift_(New_Earth)
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Kevin_Connor_(Earth-616)
Originally posted by Stoic
But Kevin fought 3 Abstract beings and did extremely well against them. He is well above the Herald tier. The Spectre has variable power levels. Kevin has the actual feats, which is what I was asking. If Shade doesn't, this isn't much of a contest.
Originally posted by carver9
Starbrand
Originally posted by celeyhyga17
The 3 abstracts fought through proxies. They were empowered by the abstracts, but still he wasnt in direct contact with Eternity's children.
This is basically what happened with Starbrand vs Eternity's children. It was a monstrous feat. Haters gonna hate though.
Originally posted by Stoic
He's a planetary protector. The Starbrand is limited by the wielder's imagination. The team of Avengers that he effortlessly held off on the very first day of receiving the Starbrand are each individually planetary level threats. Starbrand has the power of an Abstract. Kevin destroys Shade.
Just want to point out that Shade's power has covered multiple small planets at the same time. While the planets themselves are small, you have to remember the DISTANCE between them would be incredibly large.
Originally posted by MrMind
this thread was made by another user's request by mistake,I personally think Shade one shots
especially modern starbrand which is only planetary
Yeah and you're also under the impression that Marvel top tiers are equal to DC street tiers. Your entire M.O. is filled with holes.
Originally posted by celeyhyga17
So he can destroy up to earth sized planets? Wondering because not sure what "only planetery" actually means.
And I would assume each Starbrand would be limited by the denizen of that planet.
But if you're asking what planetary means:
A planet is an astronomical body orbiting a star or stellar remnant that is massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity, is not massive enough to cause thermonuclear fusion, and has cleared its neighbouring region of planetesimals.
So we have an upper limit which is so that fusiydoes not occur.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Why would Kevin destroy planets?And I would assume each Starbrand would be limited by the denizen of that planet.
But if you're asking what planetary means:
A planet is an astronomical body orbiting a star or stellar remnant that is massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity, is not massive enough to cause thermonuclear fusion, and has cleared its neighbouring region of planetesimals.
So we have an upper limit which is so that fusiydoes not occur.
"fusiydoes"?
Originally posted by MrMind
you are right for the first time in your 50 years of existence, congrats old man
In that case it becomes painfully clear that your opinion shouldn't ever be taken seriously. You are exactly like Quanchi, and yet for some reason you haven't been banned for commiting the same fouls that led to him being banned.