Shade vs Starbrand

Started by MrMind3 pages

Shade vs Starbrand

who wins

https://dc.fandom.com/wiki/Richard_Swift_(New_Earth)

https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Kevin_Connor_(Earth-616)

Do you believe that Shade could effortlessly hold off the team that Kevin did, or resist abstract beings? I'm asking because I'm not very knowledgeable when it comes to him.

Shade's best team feat imo is creating a barrier that no one could get through.

Think he was merged though.

There's also Dr Fate saying he'd have trouble with him, and only the Spectre could handle him or something like that.

But Kevin fought 3 Abstract beings and did extremely well against them. He is well above the Herald tier. The Spectre has variable power levels. Kevin has the actual feats, which is what I was asking. If Shade doesn't, this isn't much of a contest.

Starbrand

Originally posted by Stoic
But Kevin fought 3 Abstract beings and did extremely well against them. He is well above the Herald tier. The Spectre has variable power levels. Kevin has the actual feats, which is what I was asking. If Shade doesn't, this isn't much of a contest.

The 3 abstracts fought through proxies. They were empowered by the abstracts, but still he wasnt in direct contact with Eternity's children.

Originally posted by carver9
Starbrand

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
The 3 abstracts fought through proxies. They were empowered by the abstracts, but still he wasnt in direct contact with Eternity's children.

That's how abstracts fight sometimes. Look at Quasar vs Maelstrom. It was really Infinity and Oblivion fighting but through their abstracts.

This is basically what happened with Starbrand vs Eternity's children. It was a monstrous feat. Haters gonna hate though.

this thread was made by another user's request by mistake,

I personally think Shade one shots

especially modern starbrand which is only planetary

Originally posted by MrMind

especially modern starbrand which is only planetary

What size planet?

Earth, I'd guess.

He's a planetary protector. The Starbrand is limited by the wielder's imagination. The team of Avengers that he effortlessly held off on the very first day of receiving the Starbrand are each individually planetary level threats. Starbrand has the power of an Abstract. Kevin destroys Shade.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Earth, I'd guess.

So he can destroy up to earth sized planets? Wondering because not sure what "only planetary" actually means.

Originally posted by Stoic
He's a planetary protector. The Starbrand is limited by the wielder's imagination. The team of Avengers that he effortlessly held off on the very first day of receiving the Starbrand are each individually planetary level threats. Starbrand has the power of an Abstract. Kevin destroys Shade.

Just want to point out that Shade's power has covered multiple small planets at the same time. While the planets themselves are small, you have to remember the DISTANCE between them would be incredibly large.

Originally posted by MrMind
this thread was made by another user's request by mistake,

I personally think Shade one shots

especially modern starbrand which is only planetary

Yeah and you're also under the impression that Marvel top tiers are equal to DC street tiers. Your entire M.O. is filled with holes.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Just want to point out that Shade's power has covered multiple small planets at the same time. While the planets themselves are small, you have to remember the DISTANCE between them would be incredibly large.

Battle feats?

Originally posted by Stoic
Marvel top tiers are equal to DC street tiers

you are right for the first time in your 50 years of existence, congrats old man

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
So he can destroy up to earth sized planets? Wondering because not sure what "only planetery" actually means.

Why would Kevin destroy planets?

And I would assume each Starbrand would be limited by the denizen of that planet.

But if you're asking what planetary means:

A planet is an astronomical body orbiting a star or stellar remnant that is massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity, is not massive enough to cause thermonuclear fusion, and has cleared its neighbouring region of planetesimals.

So we have an upper limit which is so that fusiydoes not occur.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Why would Kevin destroy planets?

And I would assume each Starbrand would be limited by the denizen of that planet.

But if you're asking what planetary means:

A planet is an astronomical body orbiting a star or stellar remnant that is massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity, is not massive enough to cause thermonuclear fusion, and has cleared its neighbouring region of planetesimals.

So we have an upper limit which is so that fusiydoes not occur.


Not saying he does. Im asking what he mean by "only planetary".
The phrase gets thrown around lot regarding starbrand. Im trying to get a clearer picture of that position.

"fusiydoes"?

****ing fat fingers lmao.

"Fusion"

Originally posted by MrMind
you are right for the first time in your 50 years of existence, congrats old man

In that case it becomes painfully clear that your opinion shouldn't ever be taken seriously. You are exactly like Quanchi, and yet for some reason you haven't been banned for commiting the same fouls that led to him being banned.