MCU Ultron vs. Wonder Woman

Originally posted by Silent Master
You have provided no proof, thus your claim is worthless.

I won the debate. You basically were reduced to trying to get someone to prove a negative. Or assign special attributes without evidence.

You have provided no proof, thus your claim is worthless.

Proving the sword can cut vibranium is neither proving a negative or assigning a special attribute.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You have provided no proof, thus your claim is worthless.

Proving the sword can cut vibranium is neither proving a negative or assigning a special attribute.

Why should vibranium get the special attribute of being highly cut resistant without proof, especially since you say DD doesn't get it?
For all we know it can be as cut resistant as titanium but more blunt force resistant than titanium. That's the standard you were applying to DD. So it's fair.

You have provided no proof, thus your claim is worthless.

Proving the sword can cut vibranium is neither proving a negative or assigning a special attribute.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You have provided no proof, thus your claim is worthless.

Proving the sword can cut vibranium is neither proving a negative or assigning a special attribute.

Here's the proof.

The sword sliced a boulder in half with ease. Since vibranium has NO feats of withstanding being cut with that level of cutting force then it can't withstand being cut by WW by default.

Cutting through a boulder is not proof it can cut vibranium, you have a bad habit of mistaking your massively biased opinion for proof

Originally posted by Silent Master
Cutting through a boulder is not proof it can cut vibranium, you have a bad habit of mistaking your massively biased opinion for proof

Asking you to back up your claim that the sword can cut vibranium is not asking you to prove a negative.

Also, if you want to claim that vibranium is especially vulnerable to being cut. That is also a positive claim that you would need to back up.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Asking you to back up your claim that the sword can cut vibranium is not asking you to prove a negative.

Also, if you want to claim that vibranium is especially vulnerable to being cut. That is also a positive claim that you would need to back up.

Materials don't get special attributes without proof. It's automatically vulnerable to being cut with Boulder cutting power by default.

Wrong, it would only be vulnerable to boulder levels of cutting force if 1) it had boulder level durability or 2) it was especially vulnerable to being cut, like DCEU Wonder Woman's vulnerability to bullets

Have fun proving it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Wrong, it would only be vulnerable to boulder levels of cutting force if 1) it had boulder level durability or 2) it was especially vulnerable to being cut, like DCEU Wonder Woman's vulnerability to bullets

Have fun proving it.

It's a special attribute to be resistant against Boulder level cutting force.
Vibranium (of that thickness) doesn't get that without proof.

It's only a special attribute if vibranium has the same level of durability as the boulder, have fun moving that

Edit: proving

Wonder Woman probably if the sword can cut Ultron's metal body.

Originally posted by Silent Master
It's only a special attribute if vibranium has the same level of durability as the boulder, have fun moving that

Make no mistake. We are referring to cutting durability and not other types of durability. Otherwise DD is super resistant against cuts.

Therefore, it is a special attribute for a thin sheet to have the same level (or above) of CUTTING durability as the multiple feet of boulder.

It's only a special attribute if vibranium has the same level of durability as the boulder, have fun proving that

Originally posted by Silent Master
It's only a special attribute if vibranium has the same level of durability as the boulder, have fun proving that

You are ignoring thin sheet vs multiple feet and falsely assuming volume for volume.

Again, a THIN sheet of vibranium has LESSER cutting durability than MULTIPLE feet of Boulder BY DEFAULT since it would be a special attribute for the thin sheet to have cutting resistance beyond multiple feet of Boulder.

Remember the rule, no character has resistance to an attack if there is no evidence to support it. For example, any character is vulnerable to telepathy attacks if they haven't shown resistance. No one has to prove a character is vulnerable to TP. They are automatically are if they have no feats to support otherwise.

Have fun proving that Vibranium has less than boulder level durability.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Have fun proving that Vibranium has less than boulder level durability.

Classic trolling of ignoring what I said while moving the goalposts (proving vibranium is less durable pound for pound instead of proving a thin sheet is less durable equal to several feet of Boulder.)

Originally posted by h1a8
You are ignoring thin sheet vs multiple feet and falsely assuming volume for volume.

Again, a THIN sheet of vibranium has LESSER cutting durability than MULTIPLE feet of Boulder BY DEFAULT since it would be a special attribute for the thin sheet to have cutting resistance beyond multiple feet of Boulder.

Remember the rule, no character has resistance to an attack if there is no evidence to support it. For example, any character is vulnerable to telepathy attacks if they haven't shown resistance. No one has to prove a character is vulnerable to TP. They are automatically are if they have no feats to support otherwise.

Have fun proving that Vibranium has less than boulder level durability.