Originally posted by h1a8
Make no mistake. We are referring to cutting durability and not other types of durability. Otherwise DD is super resistant against cuts.Therefore, it is a special attribute for a thin sheet to have the same level (or above) of CUTTING durability as the multiple feet of boulder.
lol at referring to Ultron's body as a "thin sheet".
Originally posted by Silent MasterIt just means that SW armor is more durable against cutting than multiple feet of Boulder.
He's also ignoring that we have proof that WW's sword has problems against armor. IE the sword proving worthless against SW's armor.
Originally posted by FrothByte
lol at referring to Ultron's body as a "thin sheet".
Ultron's skin is a very thin sheet in comparison to multiple feet.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Like h1, do you also believe that a thin sheet of vibranium is less durable than multiple feet Boulder against cutting?
Corrected.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
No.
Silent tricked you.
He changed the goalposts. He's argument durability from a pound for pound standpoint when I'm comparing multiple feet of stone with a thin sheet of metal.
For example, what would happen if you shot a Mountain's base with a 30mm bullet? It wouldn't penetrate more than several inches (if an inch). What about an inch of hardened steel? Would definitely penetrate completely.
See the difference? It's not about pound for pound but overall cutting durability.
WW sliced through a huge multiton boulder like a hot knife through butter (almost no resistance). Any ordinary man made sword would have broke upon impact.
Originally posted by h1a8Wait what. H1 actually making a good point. Nice. 👆
Silent tricked you.
He changed the goalposts. He's argument durability from a pound for pound standpoint when I'm comparing multiple feet of stone with a thin sheet of metal.For example, what would happen if you shot a Mountain's base with a 30mm bullet? It wouldn't penetrate more than several inches (if an inch). What about an inch of hardened steel? Would definitely penetrate completely.
See the difference? It's not about pound for pound but overall cutting durability.
WW sliced through a huge multiton boulder like a hot knife through butter (almost no resistance). Any ordinary man made sword would have broke upon impact.
Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Wait what. H1 actually making a good point. Nice. 👆
Really? Because most people would think arguing that metal armor was especially vulnerable to cutting attacks was retarded. I mean it's not like metal armor was worn by Knights for the express purpose of defending them against swords.