The murder of Ahmaud Arbery/All three perpetrators found guilty

Started by Surtur123 pages

Originally posted by Raptor22
its weird that u need 100% proof to lable someone a racist, but u had no problem with people labeling Ahmaud a burgler and justifying his killing because of it without even close to 100% evidence.

"Just dipshits claiming this is racist with no proof, no other problems besides that."- surt

"So yes it needs to be proven. 100%"- surt

This is a lie I never said his killing was justified, even if he was a thief I said it wasn't. I also said they should never have chased him.

But hell I'll be nice and I'll lower the bar. We can forget 100% proof. Is there any proof at all that doesn't rely on merely noting skin color?

Originally posted by Surtur
This is a lie I never said his killing was justified, even if he was a thief.

But hell I'll be nice and I'll lower the bar. We can forget 100% proof. Is there any proof at all that doesn't rely on merely noting skin color?

i never said u did. Reread my post, find ur mistake, then make a proper reply.

But I do have problems with people using that to justify his killing.

But I don't think many people are doing that.

The point 99% of the time is that the narrative we were being fed wasn't true, not that they were justified.

Originally posted by Surtur
But I do have problems with people using that to justify his killing.

But I don't think many people are doing that.

The point 99% of the time is that the narrative we were being fed wasn't true, not that they were justified.

if u have a problem with people using it to justify his killing, then why have u not raised any objections to it any of the times its been said in this thread?

Why have u not asked for any proof (never mind 100%) of Ahmaud being a burglar any of the times he's been flat out called one in this thread?

Have not seen anyone in this thread say he deserved to die cuz he's a thief.

EDIT-So if I missed such a post: I object

Originally posted by Surtur
Have not seen anyone in this thread say he deserved to die cuz he's a thief.

EDIT-So if I missed such a post: I object

"FFS, this seems just like a Z vs. T case all over again but this time, the deceased is 100% guilty of the burglaries and was confronted immediately after he committed his crime. And he lost his life for it.

Arbery and his family have a criminal rap sheet longer than a CVS receipt.

"He was just jogging!" GTFO with those lies. I wish people would simply tell the truth instead of making everything about identity politics.

"What should happen next is the criminal charges dropped and the McMichael's pay 20% of their income, for the rest of their lives, to Arbery's family. If this was Texas, nothing should happen and everyone goes on with their lives."ddm

"It wasn't. It was a response to a burglary that had happened just prior to the confrontation. Literally, Arbery had just gotten done burglarizing a place, was caught, and was quite literally on the run. The polarizing headlines in the news about him just being a jogger are lies.

Race is not involved since the person did the thing that they went after him for.

Arbery burgled a lot, he was caught this last time, they had video evidence, they caught him, they chased after him, confronted him verbally, he got aggressive and approached them, a scuffle ensued, and he died from being shot.

Nothing about this is race related other than the racists who want everything to be about race. Honing in on the race of either party is dishonest.

And this whole time, morons had me believing this had anything to do with race. I took the race-bait, yet again.- ddm

To which u responded 2 ddm

"Wow, it makes every race baiter(including those in this thread) look like a piece of shit.

Be prepared for some moron to come accuse you of defending murderers. It's the "little einstein" approach"- surt

Where was your cry for proof for the burglry claims? Where were ur claims that being a theif doesn't justify his killing?

DDM i can understand. Dude does a shit ton of research and in my opinion goes out of his way 2 make sure the things he posts are accurate, and sometime u get bad info and stuff falls thru the cracks.

U on the other just wait for someone like DDM 2 make a point or argument that u agree with then jump all over his nuts agreeing with it, without any research or proof of your own.

Okay so since you're pulling your usual passive aggressive routine without providing any actual evidence this was racially motivated I can only conclude you don't actually have any.

Saw this video at last, indefensible

Originally posted by Surtur
Okay so since you're pulling your usual passive aggressive routine without providing any actual evidence this was racially motivated I can only conclude you don't actually have any.
nice deflection and strawman. Passive aggressive lol.

I never said, argued, or implied it was racially motivated so i dont need to prove something i never said.

What i did prove is that u have a huge problem with 2 admitted killers being labled as racists without 100% proof.

But have no problem having a man be shot to death, get called a burgler, and have his shooting argued 2 be justified without any proof at all.

But sure deflect and strawman. It will make it all go away.

Originally posted by Raptor22
nice deflection and strawman. Passive aggressive lol.

I never said, argued, or implied it was racially motivated so i dont need to prove something i never said.

What i did prove is that u have a huge problem with 2 admitted killers being labled as racists without 100% proof.

But have no problem having a man be shot to death, get called a burgler, and have his shooting argued 2 be justified without any proof at all.

But sure deflect and strawman. It will make it all go away.

No, you didn't prove that. And yes: passive aggressive. It's how you act when triggered. But your opinion is noted. I just don't know why it upsets you that there is no evidence of racial motivation.

Originally posted by Raptor22
"FFS, this seems just like a Z vs. T case all over again but this time, the deceased is 100% guilty of the burglaries and was confronted immediately after he committed his crime. And he lost his life for it.

Arbery and his family have a criminal rap sheet longer than a CVS receipt.

"He was just jogging!" GTFO with those lies. I wish people would simply tell the truth instead of making everything about identity politics.

"What should happen next is the criminal charges dropped and the McMichael's pay 20% of their income, for the rest of their lives, to Arbery's family. If this was Texas, nothing should happen and everyone goes on with their lives."ddm

"It wasn't. It was a response to a burglary that had happened just prior to the confrontation. Literally, Arbery had just gotten done burglarizing a place, was caught, and was quite literally on the run. The polarizing headlines in the news about him just being a jogger are lies.

Race is not involved since the person did the thing that they went after him for.

Arbery burgled a lot, he was caught this last time, they had video evidence, they caught him, they chased after him, confronted him verbally, he got aggressive and approached them, a scuffle ensued, and he died from being shot.

Nothing about this is race related other than the racists who want everything to be about race. Honing in on the race of either party is dishonest.

And this whole time, morons had me believing this had anything to do with race. I took the race-bait, yet again.- ddm

To which u responded 2 ddm

"Wow, it makes every race baiter(including those in this thread) look like a piece of shit.

Be prepared for some moron to come accuse you of defending murderers. It's the "little einstein" approach"- surt

Where was your cry for proof for the burglry claims? Where were ur claims that being a theif doesn't justify his killing?

DDM i can understand. Dude does a shit ton of research and in my opinion goes out of his way 2 make sure the things he posts are accurate, and sometime u get bad info and stuff falls thru the cracks.

U on the other just wait for someone like DDM 2 make a point or argument that u agree with then jump all over his nuts agreeing with it, without any research or proof of your own.

Savage.

Originally posted by Raptor22
nice deflection and strawman. Passive aggressive lol.

I never said, argued, or implied it was racially motivated so i dont need to prove something i never said.

What i did prove is that u have a huge problem with 2 admitted killers being labled as racists without 100% proof.

But have no problem having a man be shot to death, get called a burgler, and have his shooting argued 2 be justified without any proof at all.

But sure deflect and strawman. It will make it all go away.

👆

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Saw this video at last, indefensible

Nothing against the people who watched it, but I won't watch it, don't want to see what amounts to a snuff film.

Originally posted by Robtard
Nothing against the people who watched it, but I won't watch it, don't want to see what amounts to a snuff film.
I wanted to be able to make a judgement. It is indefensible.

Originally posted by Robtard
Savage.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
👆

More gas lighting, I will allow it 🙂

Originally posted by Surtur
No, you didn't prove that. And yes: passive aggressive. It's how you act when triggered. But your opinion is noted. I just don't know why it upsets you that there is no evidence of racial motivation.
this is what u do when u get backed into a corner and cant address the points made. U do it all the time, and ur schtick is tired and transparent.

All u have 2 to to prove me wrong is either showw us all where i made any argument for racial motivations and/or where u asked for proof of any proof of burglry.

Originally posted by Raptor22
this is what u do when u get backed into a corner and cant address the points made. U do it all the time, and ur schtick is tired and transparent.

All u have 2 to to prove me wrong is either showw us all where i made any argument for racial motivations and/or where u asked for proof of any proof of burglry.

Your passive aggressive bullshit gets old and it only ever flows in one direction. So you're not going to pretend like you're merely accusing me of hypocrisy. Sorry 🙂

Dbl post

Originally posted by Surtur
Your passive aggressive bullshit gets old and it only ever flows in one direction. So you're not going to pretend like you're merely accusing me of hypocrisy. Sorry 🙂
your hypocrisy gets old. Sry if u dont like me pointing it out and proving it.

But keep closing ur eyes and pretending its not happening.

I just wonder if this is going 2 come back to bite u when u ask someone to prove a claim in the future.

Originally posted by Surtur
Your passive aggressive bullshit gets old and it only ever flows in one direction. So you're not going to pretend like you're merely accusing me of hypocrisy. Sorry 🙂
damn i though of a great line after i made my post. Its a little late but **** it ill say it anyway.

"Your passive aggressive bullshit gets old and it only ever flows in one direction" -surt

Yeah because shit only flows in one direction, downhill. U notice it because ur beneath me. 😉