The murder of Ahmaud Arbery/All three perpetrators found guilty

Originally posted by Silent Master
You'd be the first person kicked off during jury selection, you're too biased.

Its better then going by opinions and feelings like u

Originally posted by Raptor22
if me being strongly biased towards facts and logic would disqualify me then so be it.

Its better then going by opinions and feelings like u

I've talked to a few people who were called to Jury Duty.

Only 2 made it to trial. I super badly want to be part of a jury. 🙂 It sounds amazing. I would dig right into the case and sway all my fellow jurors.

Why lie? I've repeatedly said I wanted to wait until the trial where all the evidence will be presented. So I can form an informed opinion.

Unlike you, who is happy to wallow in ignorance.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
it's good Gaslighting and a worthy attempt to undermine you. That's all it is though. Top trolling DDM 👆

Originally posted by Robtard
It's because I'm cool with Bashar. Silly as that is.

😂

Originally posted by Silent Master
Why lie? I've repeatedly said I wanted to wait until the trial where all the evidence will be presented. So I can form an informed opinion.

Unlike you, who is happy to wallow in ignorance.

Such as telling me i was wrong to call Ahmaud a victim, and that he's actually an alleged victim.

Going by the legal definitions of the words according to Georgia state law im right. Going by nothing but ur feelings ur right.

Its like im saying 2+2 = 4 and ur like nope. Then i prove it with facts from actual credible sources and ur like , Ur wrong because red and yellow makes orange.

Then u look back and r like, what i was right. Red and yellow do make orange

But u were wrong abut 2+2 not = 4, but u ignore that and play ur pretend win game. Its sad at this point.

Then u make another incorrect statement. And after i prove that wrong u go back 2 saying u were right because u said red and yellow make orange pages back while were discussing an entirely different topic.

Originally posted by Raptor22
yet that has nothing to do with the other things that u have been wrong about throughout this thread.

Such as telling me i was wrong to call Ahmaud a victim, and that he's actually an alleged victim.

Going by the legal definitions of the words according to Georgia state law im right. Going by nothing but ur feelings ur right.

Its like im saying 2+2 = 4 and ur like nope. Then i prove it with facts from actual credible sources and ur like , Ur wrong because red and yellow makes orange.

Then u look back and r like, what i was right. Red and yellow do make orange

But u were wrong abut 2+2 not = 4, but u ignore that and play ur pretend win game. Its sad at this point.

Then u make another incorrect statement. And after i prove that wrong u go back 2 saying u were right because u said red and yellow make orange pages back while were discussing an entirely different topic.

Man, I'm confused even trying to follow what you're saying, here. Use these mental powers to re-edit Alexander into chronological order.

I still think it's a silly argument. I don't think Silent Master would disagree with me about the defense arguments being required during a trial, as well. If he agreed then both of you would agree. It's not really a compromise, it's just another way of viewing the whole situation as to not get hung up on specific words.

Burden of Argument, right?

Keep wallowing in your own ignorance, us intelligent people will wait till all the evidence is in.

Originally posted by dadudemon
You've done terrible things. You should be ashamed of yourself.

You ruined one of the best people from KMC.

🙁

I remember when PB threw this girl under the bus like the one hit wonder she was. And there was a certain person that was all about defending her here😂

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
I remember when PB threw this girl under the bus like the one hit wonder she was. And there was a certain person that was all about defending her here😂

Which girl? That seems crazy. Why would Whirly do that?

It was a good thread by him actually, called her out for her bullshit.

He was spot on

Originally posted by Raptor22
yet that has nothing to do with the other things that u have been wrong about throughout this thread.

Such as telling me i was wrong to call Ahmaud a victim, and that he's actually an alleged victim.

Going by the legal definitions of the words according to Georgia state law im right. Going by nothing but ur feelings ur right.

Its like im saying 2+2 = 4 and ur like nope. Then i prove it with facts from actual credible sources and ur like , Ur wrong because red and yellow makes orange.

Then u look back and r like, what i was right. Red and yellow do make orange

But u were wrong abut 2+2 not = 4, but u ignore that and play ur pretend win game. Its sad at this point.

Then u make another incorrect statement. And after i prove that wrong u go back 2 saying u were right because u said red and yellow make orange pages back while were discussing an entirely different topic.

Honestly man, do you ever let something go? I cant even put together what you are trying to say here. Why die on this hill and end up with a post that looks like this. I mean just let it go man. Move on and find something else to talk about.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
It was a good thread by him actually, called her out for her bullshit.

He was spot on

Man, still don't know what you're talking about. This is a joke about another poster, right?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Honestly man, do you ever let something go? I cant even put together what you are trying to say here. Why die on this hill and end up with a post that looks like this. I mean just let it go man. Move on and find something else to talk about.

I'm saying , I want to wait for the trial so that I can see all the evidence. He appears to be saying. Screw that, they're guilty.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Man, I'm confused even trying to follow what you're saying, here. Use these mental powers to re-edit Alexander into chronological order.

I still think it's a silly argument. I don't think Silent Master would disagree with me about the defense arguments being required during a trial, as well. If he agreed then both of you would agree. It's not really a compromise, it's just another way of viewing the whole situation as to not get hung up on specific words.

Burden of Argument, right?

I referred to Ahmaud as a victim

Silent said i was wrong to call him that and that he's an alleged victim

i proved that Ahmaud is indeed a Homocide victim

Instead of backing up his stance with facts or acknowledging that he was wrong he proceeded with troll posts like

"No, it's your uniformed biased opinion."

"The part where you jumped to a conclusion without seeing all the evidence."

Then instead of Acknowledging being wrong about Ahmaud in fact being a Homocide victim he changes the subject 2-

"Why lie? I've repeatedly said I wanted to wait until the trial where all the evidence will be presented. So I can form an informed opinion."

No need 2 wait for any evidence on this particular matter. Its literaly indisputable.

He was wrong.

Ahmaud was indeed a Homocide victim and i was entirely correct 2 call him 1.

Him saying this-

"I've repeatedly said I wanted to wait until the trial where all the evidence will be presented. So I can form an informed opinion."-silent

Doesn't change that fact 1 bit.

Once again you're wrong, homicide is the unlawful killing of someone and as of yet the state has not proven that the killing was unlawful. Therefore, you are wrong to call him a homicide victim.

IOW, I was right

Originally posted by Silent Master
Once again you're wrong, homicide is the unlawful killing of someone and as of yet the state has not proven that the killing was unlawful. Therefore, you are wrong to call him a homicide victim.

IOW, I was right

Murder- Murder in Georgia is defined by Georgia Law as: “A person commits the offense of murder when he unlawfully and with malice aforethought, express or implied, causes the death of another human being.” O.C.G.A. §16-5-1(a)

Homocide is-

"When someone takes the life of another, regardless of intent or other details surrounding the incident, it is called a homicide."

https://statelaws.findlaw.com/georgia-law/georgia-murder-laws.html

"Homicide is simply the killing of a human being by a human being. Not all homicides are criminal offenses - for example, if a homicide results from justified self defense in Georgia."

https://www.georgiacriminallawyer.com/analysis-of-georgia-homicide-laws

Im still waiting for anything besides ur opinion.

By calling him a victim, you're implying it wasn't justified. Which the State hasn't proven yet

I was going to add the point of "justifiable homicide" to raptor's legal definitions, but then I realized that none of these definitions exist because of s&m's very special feelings.

Originally posted by Silent Master
By calling him a victim, you're implying it wasn't justified. Which the State hasn't proven yet

Ahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Ive made the distinction several time along with the definitions and links.

Implying

Ahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha what a joke

Ive already given u the D. U should just take the L aswell at this point

Originally posted by Silent Master
Once again you're wrong, homicide is the unlawful killing of someone and as of yet the state has not proven that the killing was unlawful. Therefore, you are wrong to call him a homicide victim.

IOW, I was right

Or were u?