The murder of Ahmaud Arbery/All three perpetrators found guilty

Started by Bashar Teg123 pages
Originally posted by Surtur
I'm not looking for anything. Are you denying you said there is a slim chance they would have behaved the same if the guys were white?

collectively, yes. I was not implicating one party over the other. I did state multiple possibilities, quite clearly footnoting that I was not attempting to assert these possibilities as fact. but then again I didn't assert overall racial motivation of at least one party to be fact, but rather probability. possible does not equal probable, which in turn does not equal definite.

Do you believe the McMichaels are racist yes or no?

Originally posted by Surtur
I will enjoy your spinning this:

where in that post did I assert that McMichaels was definitely racially motivated?

You asked where you implied they are racist.

So if you don't feel they are racist why is it you only feel the possibility they would react the same to whites is slim?

Originally posted by Surtur
Do you believe the McMichaels are racist yes or no?

for the millionth+ time, I refuse to assert my opinions as facts, as you are attempting to trick me into doing, very maturely I might add

Originally posted by Surtur
You asked where you implied they are racist.

So if you don't feel they are racist why is it you only feel the possibility they would react the same to whites is slim?

that all depends on whether McMichaels was kept informed of all the trespassers and chose to dismiss all the white trespassers. how many times should I repeat that?

I bet if we searched his posts we could find contrary to this statement.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
for the millionth+ time, I refuse to assert my opinions as facts, as you are attempting to trick me into doing, very maturely I might add

The problem is there isn't even any rational reason for you to be of the opinion they are racist.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
that all depends on whether McMichaels was kept informed of all the trespassers and chose to dismiss all the white trespassers. how many times should I repeat that?

We don't have any evidence they ignored white trespassers lol. If you wanna claim they did we need proof.

Originally posted by Surtur
The problem is there isn't even any rational reason for you to be of the opinion they are racist.


You mean other then the way he lumps every one that Votes a Certain Way into one big pile? Aka All Righties Racist...

Originally posted by Surtur
The problem is there isn't even any rational reason for you to be of the opinion they are racist.

given that there the only one who appears to have been pursued was black, I maintain my opinion that racial bias was involved. as to whether it was McMichaels and/or English, I cannot say for certain. Only can rest assured on the probability that one or both parties were racially biased. I do have my own speculation on the matter, which I've stated, but I'm not going to try to pass such opinions off as fact, like you have consistently done in this thread

aka Feelings = Fact.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]
You mean other then the way he lumps every one that Votes a Certain Way into one big pile? Aka All Righties Racist...
[/B]

He's acknowledged there is no evidence the McMichaels treated whites differently.

Yet it seems like he still feels they would treat them differently anyways. Cuz...reasons.

I've acknowledged that the investigation is open. you seem to be under the delusion that all evidence is presented, is public knowledge, and even that the case itself is closed and McMichaels is exonerated of racial bias. meanwhile you keep trying to trick me into asserting a claim as fact, with much maturity

Hmmm, bash admits that his opinion isn't backed up by any proof. IOW, it's an extremely biased opinion.

still waiting on that quote where I assert as fact that McMichaels specifically was racially motivated. need more time?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]aka Feelings = Fact. [/B]

Yeah he's flailing. There is no evidence to point to in order to justify the opinion the McMichaels are racist and he clearly thinks they are. So this all comes down to feelz over realz.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
still waiting on that quote where I assert as fact that McMichaels specifically was racially motivated. need more time?

What was said is you implied they are racist. Given how your reaction clearly this is true.

so you have no quote to provide, to prove your repeated accusation of some opinion of mine which I states as fact, and will resort to group-coping? I guess I can look forward to personal attacks now?

Originally posted by Surtur
What was said is you implied they are racist. Given how your reaction clearly this is true.

in my opinion both parties were racially motivated and are trying to push the blame on eachother after the fact to avoid consequences. again, that's my opinion which I never once asserted as fact, and quite clearly so. but you have fun with your friends, trying to put words in my mouth with no proof, with much maturity