The murder of Ahmaud Arbery/All three perpetrators found guilty

Originally posted by Surtur
By all means show me the post you misunderstood.

I am not, I've answered it already.

Nope been answered before.

so your avoidance of the question was your answer? noted. moving on...

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
I've already said I never look back, please clarify your position as I'm not sure I get it.

I have said, repeatedly, it wasn't justified.

You lied and said I reversed course because of a youtuber, but I never changed my mind.

Originally posted by Surtur
I have said, repeatedly, it wasn't justified.

ah, good. thanks for clarifying your position 👆

I forget..is it in this thread or another where Bashy bitched about Page upon Page of Shitposting going on?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]I forget..is it in this thread or another where Bashy bitched about Page upon Page of Shitposting going on? [/B]

This is the thread where some tried to say the shooters had a racist motive and then when more and more evidence came out suggesting otherwise(in combination with the fact there was no evidence to suggest they were racist in the first place) some pivoted to saying the neighbor might be racist. While still heavily implying the shooters are racist, but begrudgingly acknowledging they have no proof.

It's all very fascinating.

I am just glad at least some have acknowledged there is no evidence the shooters are racist. Even if they do still think they are racist and even if they clarify it with a "no evidence...YET!" it is still progress.

Originally posted by Surtur
even if they clarify it with a "no evidence...YET!" it is still progress.

so the investigation is concluded?

Maybe they wore black face in the 1980s who knows.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so the investigation is concluded?

So now you want to wait until all the evidence is in, why the change of heart?

no doubt you will post a quote of mine which presumes otherwise...

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so the investigation is concluded?

I never said it was.

Do you think the McMichaels are racist? You sure seemed to imply it.

Originally posted by Surtur
I never said it was.

Do you think the McMichaels are racist? You sure seemed to imply it.

where did i imply that? it seems we agree that at least one party (McMichaels or English) showed racial bias. you seem to be asserting that McMichaels was an innocent party to racial bias. shouldn't you be the one with burden of proof, since you made that assertion? unless you want to provide a quote of mine in which I assert McMichaels as the one who was racially motivated, as opposed to English (or vice versa)?

Yep. He sure did imply it.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
where did i imply that? it seems we agree that at least one party (McMichaels or English) showed racial bias. you seem to be asserting that McMichaels was an innocent party to racial bias. shouldn't you be the one with burden of proof, since you made that assertion? unless you want to provide a quote of mine in which I assert McMichaels as the one who was racially motivated, as opposed to English (or vice versa)?

You said there is only a slim chance that the McMichaels would react the same way if they'd been notified about the white trespassers.

with 3 people looking for this damning quote of mine, asserting McMichaels specifically as the one acting on racial bias, which totally exists, surely at least one of you will strike paydirt. I wait with anticipation

I'm not looking for anything. Are you denying you said there is a slim chance they would have behaved the same if the guys were white?

Originally posted by Surtur
You said there is only a slim chance that the McMichaels would react the same way if they'd been notified about the white trespassers.

where did i state McMichaels specifically? forgive me if I don't take your word at face value, but I'm sure this supposed quote of mine is non-existent. still waiting with much anticipation

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
with 3 people looking for this damning quote of mine, asserting McMichaels specifically as the one acting on racial bias, which totally exists, surely at least one of you will strike paydirt. I wait with anticipation

Bashy Be Trigged YO!

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
where did i state McMichaels specifically? forgive me if I don't take your word at face value, but I'm sure this supposed quote of mine is non-existent. still waiting with much anticipation

I will enjoy your spinning this:

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
no evidence so far. I'm willing to accept the (slim) possibility that McMichaels would have treated a white trespasser with the same actions and was not notified about them, but that's based on blind assumptions. it could also be that McMichaels dismissed earlier calls concerning white trespassers. could also be that they agreed to only report trespassers of a dark complexion. many possibilities

it does seem likely that at least one party decided that white trespassers were to be ignored and dismissed