The murder of Ahmaud Arbery/All three perpetrators found guilty

Started by Old Man Whirly!123 pages

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
ironic since he always posts "trigger warning" with his "muh tim pool!" videos
That is for himself, I am sure of that. I think Surt knows Tim vaguely. I suspect Surt has been to some Chicago political meetings Tim has spoken at, probably behind locked doors.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm just glad you acknowledged the lack of evidence the shooting happened due to racism. This is a positive thing.

...so far. but you do realize that even if no evidence is found, that doesn't justify the homicide, which is a whole other matter. right? right

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
...so far. but you do realize that even if no evidence is found, that doesn't justify the homicide, which is a whole other matter. right? right

Have said multiple times they shouldn't have pursued him. My entire point was about the claims the shooters were motivated by racism.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
...so far. but you do realize that even if no evidence is found, that doesn't justify the homicide, which is a whole other matter. right? right
He actually agreed to that too o think before youtube told him what to think.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
He actually agreed to that too o think before youtube told him what to think.

Why lie?

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
He actually agreed to that too o think before youtube told him what to think.

seems like YouTube has a logic/reason/emotional impairment effect on ol' surt

Ah, now I see why he lied. Because certain others will believe it without question.

Lol.

at the risk of strawmanning: are you suggesting that a lack of racial bias evidence automatically justifies the homicide?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
seems like YouTube has a logic/reason/emotional impairment effect on ol' surt
YouTube definately either tells Surt what to think or like minded video's reinforce his views.
Originally posted by Surtur
Why lie?
I'm not lying Surt if I misunderstood apologies.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
at the risk of strawmanning: are you suggesting that a lack of racial bias evidence automatically justifies the homicide?
oooohhhh, now that's an interesting question.

Yes, I never once reversed my position that this wasn't justified. It's a lie you pulled out of thin air.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
oooohhhh, now that's an interesting question.

because if so I got some bid'ness to take care of. I'm feeling threatened *cocks shotgun*

Originally posted by Surtur
Yes, I never once reversed my position that this wasn't justified. It's a lie you pulled out of thin air.
it isn't but apologies for misunderstanding you.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
because if so I got some bid'ness to take care of. I'm feeling threatened *cocks shotgun*
so Surt are you going to answer Bash?

Hmmm Bash and Whrily posting ALMOST Simultaneously?

HHHHMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!????

I'm actually a sock account of surt's. multiple personally disorder

OH I bet you want one of Surts Socks.....

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Hmmm Bash and Whrily posting ALMOST Simultaneously?

HHHHMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!???? [/B]

and I dumb down to post as everyone else on the site.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
it isn't but apologies for misunderstanding you.

By all means show me the post you misunderstood.

so Surt are you going to answer Bash?

I am not, I've answered it already.

you didn't answer. you dodged. unless you consider dodging the question to be a valid answer?