Man Gunned Down Over Property Dispute

Started by dadudemon3 pages

Man Gunned Down Over Property Dispute

Black kills white man. The alleged murderer claims he was afraid for his life after being called a racial slur. He is charged with manslaughter/second degree murder.

Take a look at the video:

https://www.12news.com/article/news/crime/buckeye-man-killed-in-property-dispute/75-9000697f-c0a3-4a93-87e9-5177a7deee19

It will not be covered in the mainstream news. No one will give a shit except the direct friends and family of the people involved.

Compare and contrast this with the Arbery shooting. Unlike the other shooting, there is clear and definitive evidence that this is racially motivated.

Awful, RIP.

And since the perpetrator wasn't killed after...there goes that excuse for the lack of coverage.

Time to see if certain people are consistent.

I will keep this bumped for a week.

100 to 1 Robtard will say how this is awful, then deflect to Trump or some other deflection.

Also he was gunned down with an AK-47. He was probably Muslim according to Lucien.

The same people who immediately assumed the Arbery thing was racially motivated will be showing a lot more caution here.

The thing is we know they won't be doing that because they learned a lesson with how the narrative for Arbery fell apart. They'll be more cautious cuz this is a black guy who has killed a white guy. That will be the sole reason.

In this scenario, it was a wealthy businessman, with a family that included young children, that was handsome. All the signs that this is a really big deal and their faces should be all over the news.

But why isn't it? Where is the incessant coverage for an obviously racially motivated murder over a property dispute? Unlike Arbery, this man was well liked by his employees, the community, and his family loved him (some families are not so good so having a boss, husband, and father who is well-liked is kind of rare, imo).

This should be a big deal since the Arbery case is a big deal. Deals with the same situation: lawful defense vs. mansalughter. And it involves racism. It frustrates me that we focus so much on race. I just wanted to point out the hypocrisy by the racist media. And also to call attention to this super shitty news...a good man was murdered.

Originally posted by Surtur
The same people who immediately assumed the Arbery thing was racially motivated will be showing a lot more caution here.

The thing is we know they won't be doing that because they learned a lesson with how the narrative for Arbery fell apart. They'll be more cautious cuz this is a black guy who has killed a white guy. That will be the sole reason.

So I assume you mean Raptor22?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So I assume you mean Raptor22?

Well Rob pushed the racism narrative from the beginning, I think Bash defended it and Raptor got upset when it fell apart.

So it will be curious to see how they respond.

He did meltdown like nothing I have ever seen, SM wore him out.

He started talking like "if 2+2=4, then u don get wat im saying, do u, bc dis is wat u are sayn."

If you think I'm exaggerating, go look.

Originally posted by dadudemon
In this scenario, it was a wealthy businessman, with a family that included young children, that was handsome. All the signs that this is a really big deal and their faces should be all over the news.

But why isn't it? Where is the incessant coverage for an obviously racially motivated murder over a property dispute? Unlike Arbery, this man was well liked by his employees, the community, and his family loved him (some families are not so good so having a boss, husband, and father who is well-liked is kind of rare, imo).

This should be a big deal since the Arbery case is a big deal. Deals with the same situation: lawful defense vs. mansalughter. And it involves racism. It frustrates me that we focus so much on race. I just wanted to point out the hypocrisy by the racist media. And also to call attention to this super shitty news...a good man was murdered.

We both know why it isn't getting the same level of coverage.

Originally posted by Surtur
Well Rob pushed the racism narrative from the beginning, I think Bash defended it and Raptor got upset when it fell apart.

So it will be curious to see how they respond.

This time, he'll get upset if the narrative doesn't fall apart. the kid's bias is next level.

The very poor behavior of every poster above me aside, this look like murder.

As far as it reads, it seems these two had an ongoing fightfor some time over property which netted both of them in a heated exchange, Mladick walked away to his truck and then Berry shot him with an AK-47.

Unless Mladick had a gun as well, I see no possible defense here for Berry, zero. This is also another reason why we need to talk about gun control. An AK-47 is a weapon of war, lovely gun, one of my favorites, but its a weapon of mass destruction.

Of course no one will care about this story (at least not anyone on the looney left) because it doesn't fit their BS narrative.

I mean, if you people put aside your feelings and look at it objectively, a man was killed in what looks very much like a murder and the suspected murderer was taken into custody that night and he's being charged with murder. It wasn't swept under the rug for months until a video came out showing the murder.

If the same had happened when Arbery was murdered, it wouldn't be coast-to-coast news as well.

So this is just a normal murder, rather than a racially motivated one?

Doesn't appear to be with the optics on the surface. If there's something I missed, sure.

I've no problem with you believing Berry was a racist Black man who just wanted to murder a White man though. Have fun with that.

It's a racially-motivated crime only when it's a white person killing a non-white person, right robbie?

Originally posted by Robtard
Doesn't appear to be with the optics on the surface. If there's something I missed, sure.

I've no problem with you believing Berry was a racist Black man who just wanted to murder a White man though. Have fun with that.

Where did I say that I believed "Berry was a racist Black man who just wanted to murder a White man".

This came up some years ago during the Trayvon thing. The issue remains the same. We can discuss how racist/not racist each incident was, but these aren't identical things.

The black dude who killed the white guy was, swiftly, brought up on charges. Of course it won't be covered: there is no controversy because the Justice system acted as it should.

The white guys who killed Arbery roamed around free for several months. It was only because of public outrage at the later video release that the white guys are even facing charges at all.

The white and black killers are all morons either way though. Can we all agree with that?

Originally posted by Robtard
The very poor behavior of every poster above me aside, this look like murder.

Translation: