Superman, Majestic and Omni-Man vs Sentry, Hyperion and Blue Marvel

Started by Adam Grimes15 pages

Originally posted by carver9
So who beats BM on team 1 and why? Name the fts.
Question unrelated to the post. You should keep up with the argument before trying to chime in. Lol

Majestic has better strength, speed and durability feats than BM, for example. But you are just going to low-ball, aren't you?

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Majestic has better strength, speed and durability feats than BM, for example. But you are just going to low-ball, aren't you?

And Blue Marvel have better combat showings. FAR better combat showings. Now we are back at square one on which one is more important, space cheese fts or combat showings.

They both have their place. Pr has ruled more than once I think that there is no such thing as space cheese feats. Carver, you would do well to remember that. Just a friendly and ominous sounding warning 😉

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Vs Sentry + Avengers? Nice ft.

One-shotting Ultimate Hulk? Meh

The Hulk/Thor level punch lip service? A-okay, I guess

Ultimo droid? Meh

King Hyperion? Meh lol

Beating alien yadda yadda? Meh

Containing the shaper's essence? Lol

Add that we see Blue Marvel laying out Pagan. Busiek's entire Avengers team, including Thor, are unable to take down Pagan.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
They both have their place. Pr has ruled more than once I think that there is no such thing as space cheese feats. Carver, you would do well to remember that. Just a friendly and ominous sounding warning 😉
If those "space cheese" feats were performed by Hulk, BM, Glads or Sentry...........he'll be shouting them from the roof tops, LOL!!!!!!!

Originally posted by carver9
And Blue Marvel have better combat showings. FAR better combat showings. Now we are back at square one on which one is more important, space cheese fts or combat showings.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
They both have their place. Pr has ruled more than once I think that there is no such thing as space cheese feats. Carver, you would do well to remember that. Just a friendly and ominous sounding warning 😉

Please don't quote Darksaint. He did nothing to help what I just asked.

Originally posted by lawest9
If those "space cheese" feats were performed by Hulk, BM, Glads or Sentry...........he'll be shouting them from the roof tops, LOL!!!!!!!

I dont do that though. I primarily debate using fights. When someone mentions space cheese showings, that's when I throw them out. You do know Hulk destroyed a Universe, walked through an attack that was destroying reality AND nearly overpowered a being whom presence was ripping reality apart and i STILL don't mention it. He also have fts of destroying a machine that could defeat the entire Celestial race and was outright said by the smartest man in Marvel that he is more powerful than a being that could kill the entire Celestial race. Beyonder said Hulk power have no limit. Like, it becomes unfair when we talk about him but again, I stick with battles. Ignoring those, Hulk is Abstract. His weaker forms.

There's no such thing as "space cheese".

Define 'space cheese' Carv.

"Space cheese" has always seemed like such a copout to me. Most people just use that term to try and handwave away any high-end showings they don't like.

Team 1

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Define 'space cheese' Carv.

Outliers that holds no weight on what an opponent can do in a fight. Example of this is Terrax who hung in a Black hole (while weakened mind you) and withstood it with no problems at all. Crushed a planet with a simple swing. In a fight against someone who doesn't come close to having power output that even match those showings, like, let's say Black Adam - people, including myself would give Adam the edge and completely ignore the things Terrax have endured and also dished out. Fights are what matter. People only pay attention to cheese fts when it suits them.

My familiarity with the phrase comes from seeing Abhilegend repeatedly use it. I thought it was a common reference.

Originally posted by carver9
Outliers that holds no weight on what an opponent can do in a fight. Example of this is Terrax who hung in a Black hole (while weakened mind you) and withstood it with no problems at all. Crushed a planet with a simple swing. In a fight against someone who doesn't come close to having power output that even match those showings, like, let's say Black Adam - people, including myself would give Adam the edge and completely ignore the things Terrax have endured and also dished out. Fights are what matter. People only pay attention to cheese fts when it suits them.

Nice.

Batman, Wolverine, Cap etc are basically heralds then.

Originally posted by Galan007
"Space cheese" has always seemed like such a copout to me. Most people just use that term to try and handwave away any high-end showings they don't like.
Space cheese feats do have their place. But combat showings should surely take preferance.

Originally posted by carver9
Outliers that holds no weight on what an opponent can do in a fight. Example of this is Terrax who hung in a Black hole (while weakened mind you) and withstood it with no problems at all. Crushed a planet with a simple swing. In a fight against someone who doesn't come close to having power output that even match those showings, like, let's say Black Adam - people, including myself would give Adam the edge and completely ignore the things Terrax have endured and also dished out. Fights are what matter. People only pay attention to cheese fts when it suits them.
What differentiates space cheese from regular feats?

Or are combat feats strictly the only ones that should be used?

Originally posted by Insane Titan
Space cheese feats do have their place. But combat showings should surely take preferance.

I say it depends on how many appearances a character has.

The more popular a character (or more accurately, the more appearances they have) the more "space cheese" should take precedence over "fights".

Why? Because they start to get jobbed out to the new flavours of the week. When Grail first appeared, she took on the entire League, was owning an amped WW etc....

Now she's not at that level.

When Zoom first appeared, he was casually blocking a bloodlusted Wally with one hand.

Now? Liberty Belle, Batman etc have had their moments with Zoom.

Onto Marvel. Voidtry gets sucked off by Fat Cobra. Proxima gets outmanoeuvred by random Wakandans. Low showings? Yes - but that's my point. The more they appear in mainstream comics, the more they - especially the powerful characters - have to job so that lazy writers can continue to churn out stories with them struggling.

But we still know that Zoom is fast. That Voidtry is powerful. Because their "space cheese" is still valid.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
What differentiates space cheese from regular feats?

Or are combat feats strictly the only ones that should be used?

Space cheese fts are relevant but not as relevant as you all make it out to be. Spiderman has survived the ultimate nullifier and he would still lose against Wolverine. Lol... people cling to space cheese fts because they have nothing else. This is why I make threads asking for fights because 9 times out of 10, I know they don't exist. When these people fight that have pretty good space cheese fts, they look just as normal as any other Herald. There are a very few number of characters that have both. Thanos and Hulk are good examples of beings who have both.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
My familiarity with the phrase comes from seeing Abhilegend repeatedly use it. I thought it was a common reference.

😂

Y do i feel like this is troo. I try not to use that phrase too often, but it does does remind me of Abhi whenever I see it being used.