Originally posted by Galan007
Manhattan isn't the Avengers, though.Manhattan studied the superstructure of the metaverse(across all the fundamental points in its timeline) at a far deeper level than anyone has before, and made three distinct conclusions:
a.) Everything comes from Superman -- the metaverse itself literally revolves around him.
b.) Superman is the metaverse's "greatest antibody" when it comes to dealing with threats to creation.
c.) That it was entirely possible for Superman to kill him.Do we have any reason at all to assume that he was wrong about any of those points, and just speaking in hyperbole to himself?
Love how Carver just casually ignores this.
Originally posted by TheHulksterhe was over 100% but not more than 200% because didn’t even realize it right away. Then the other 5 suns he was in them for milliseconds. How much would he have absorbed in those 5?
He is beyond totally rejuvenated after first sun.
The longer Superman stays in the sun the bigger the amp. He was in the first sun longer than the other 5 combined.
P
Originally posted by Diesldude
he was over 100% but not more than 200% because didn’t even realize it right away. Then the other 5 suns he was in them for milliseconds. How much would he have absorbed in those 5?The longer Superman stays in the sun the bigger the amp. He was in the first sun longer than the other 5 combined.
Plus, they were tiny suns.
Remember how people tried to downplay the planet shattering? 'What's the size', 'It could be hollow', 'What's it made of'......
Originally posted by carver9
I dont think your scan proves your statements though. Statements are nice and all. I would love to think Hulk is more powerful than the entire Celestial race and that Hulk is the most powerful being in existence but when there isn't much backing those claims up, they become just that, claims. Nice scans though.🙂
Carver, reading your post always puts a smile on my face.
Originally posted by Galan007
Manhattan isn't the Avengers, though.Manhattan studied the superstructure of the metaverse(across all the fundamental points in its timeline) at a far deeper level than anyone has before, and made three distinct conclusions:
a.) Everything comes from Superman -- the metaverse itself literally revolves around him.
b.) Superman is the metaverse's "greatest antibody" when it comes to dealing with threats to creation.
c.) That it was entirely possible for Superman to kill him.Do we have any reason at all to assume that he was wrong about any of those points, and just speaking in hyperbole to himself?
Carver, hello!
Originally posted by Galan007
Manhattan isn't the Avengers, though.Manhattan studied the superstructure of the metaverse(across all the fundamental points in its timeline) at a far deeper level than anyone has before, and made three distinct conclusions:
a.) Everything comes from Superman -- the metaverse itself literally revolves around him.
b.) Superman is the metaverse's "greatest antibody" when it comes to dealing with threats to creation.
c.) That it was entirely possible for Superman to kill him.Do we have any reason at all to assume that he was wrong about any of those points, and just speaking in hyperbole to himself?
Great post. JBL wouldn’t dare challenge this
Originally posted by CatL18
As title said, Who can beat Superman with his full potential unlocked？
Superman have one-punched World Forger.
And, Dr Manhattan have thought that Superman is ultimate Guardian of DC cosmology despite there are countless over multiversal
beings in DC cosmology.
So,How powerful is Superman with his true potential?
I don't think he can be beaten physically....mentally however Joker would wreck him.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
😂Apparently someone has been paying attention🙂
I always pay attention to children with incredible abilities, that literally defy the typical parameters of child psychology. I take jbl at face value and think he should be proud of his prodigy savant child. Then again i could have misinterpreted jbl when he said his 5 year old talks to comic writers and ascribed intelligence to jbl jr. Instead of ascribing a lack of sophistication on jbl's understanding of comics, which does seem to be through the lens of a 5 year old... Or jbl jr. Could be a total fabrication because using the imagery and emotional associations of a child can be disarming and it takes a particular kind of sicko to lie about kids, and we all know jbl is just a normal stable genius of a guy who thinks the superman wank is unjustified.
Originally posted by ilikecomics
I always pay attention to children with incredible abilities, that literally defy the typical parameters of child psychology. I take jbl at face value and think he should be proud of his prodigy savant child. Then again i could have misinterpreted jbl when he said his 5 year old talks to comic writers and ascribed intelligence to jbl jr. Instead of ascribing a lack of sophistication on jbl's understanding of comics, which does seem to be through the lens of a 5 year old... Or jbl jr. Could be a total fabrication because using the imagery and emotional associations of a child can be disarming and it takes a particular kind of sicko to lie about kids, and we all know jbl is just a normal stable genius of a guy who thinks the superman wank is unjustified.
Bravo, you should post here more🙂