Originally posted by JBLand this was when he was 3?
My dad owned his own business and hired her when one of his former employees tried to sue because he got hurt on the job. We were already rich and now, I myself run the business. My son found out they were writers for DC when me and the writers became friends.
The single thing causing me the most confusion about jbl's claims is that he first claims that 1.) he is friends with dc writers and 2.) that jbl gets his info about comics through his 5 year old son.
The second claim is the part that should raise red flags, if youre friends with dc writers then they should be your source of info. However im willing to bet that using a 5 year old child allows for two psychological tricks 1.) you get to say you dont read dc, thus you wouldn't be equipped to talk to your writer buds, but your 5 year old does like dc (which insinuates that people who read dc have the sensibilities of a 5 year old) and is thus equipped to talk to them. This lets you look down at dc fans in condescension, while still pretending to be in a forum style discourse on equal terms and 2.) saying your info is from a 5 year old allows you to have understandably vague insight into the things youre talking about, so if you come across as uninformed you can scapegoat the child.
And that's all assuming you actually have a son or actually have friends that write at dc. I dont think you do have a son and i think he's the aforementioned disarment construct and i dont think you know dc writers and that theyre just a construct that allow you to use the fallacy of appeal to expertise.
Also you should know the more adscititious details you add to an explanation the more it seems mendacious. If youre going to lie you should look up how to be more effective; a little subtlety goes a long way.
Edit: in regard to the thread; no one, without destroying the multiverse too.
Originally posted by ilikecomicsyou’re giving JBL way too much credit. I’ve always felt I was responding to a pre- k level intellect when in conversation with him. That’s ok if it’s jR, he can grow up; but If its JBL he’s got no reason to go on reproducing especially while living off of his stepmom’s earnings.
The single thing causing me the most confusion about jbl's claims is that he first claims that 1.) he is friends with dc writers and 2.) that jbl gets his info about comics through his 5 year old son.The second claim is the part that should raise red flags, if youre friends with dc writers then they should be your source of info. However im willing to bet that using a 5 year old child allows for two psychological tricks 1.) you get to say you dont read dc, thus you wouldn't be equipped to talk to your writer buds, but your 5 year old does like dc (which insinuates that people who read dc have the sensibilities of a 5 year old) and is thus equipped to talk to them. This lets you look down at dc fans in condescension, while still pretending to be in a forum style discourse on equal terms and 2.) saying your info is from a 5 year old allows you to have understandably vague insight into the things youre talking about, so if you come across as uninformed you can scapegoat the child.
And that's all assuming you actually have a son or actually have friends that write at dc. I dont think you do have a son and i think he's the aforementioned disarment construct and i dont think you know dc writers and that theyre just a construct that allow you to use the fallacy of appeal to expertise.
Also you should know the more adscititious details you add to an explanation the more it seems mendacious. If youre going to lie you should look up how to be more effective; a little subtlety goes a long way.
Edit: in regard to the thread; no one, without destroying the multiverse too.