Originally posted by truejedi
Seriously, what are the Republicans mad about? You claimed to hate Biden. Just like us, you should be happy he quit. It is win win. Should make everyone happy all around. If Trump dropped out, id be thrilled too.
Originally posted by FalconPaunch!
When did I say I hated Biden?
Who said he was talking to you.
confused from all the abuse and trauma in the otf today? maybe you should ignore some people 😂
Missed this post;
Originally posted by Robtard
By main fear about MI and WI, they're going to paint Harris as a "wealthy coastal elitist" with "San Francisco [evil] values", even though she grew up in an apartment complex in Berkeley until she was 12.While Trump is the NY billionaire born with a diamond inlaid gold spoon in his mouth, but he's apparently the least elitist man in America.
Ohio is now Red, but I think Biden's endorsements can probably still swing PA for Harris.
that graph-paper brain of yours. You gotta zoom out and look at the big picture, and definitely stop trusting the polls. Wait until the sexist/racist attacks heat up. Trump is going to appear a raging senile grandpa trying to ruin thanksgiving, and Harris will be cool as a cucumber and take him down. It'll be frickin wonderful. Many months back I hoped it would be Michelle Obama to do this, and she sure as shit could, but I'll gladly settle for this
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Obama and Pelosi are openly supporting an open convention now instead of backing Harris, so my guess is that will instantly gain momentum and there will be an open convention. However I think they should argue over the details for weeks. The less time democrats have to publicly hobble each other fighting for the top spot, the better. Plus it's boooooring so network news might put the focus on Project trump 2025
I was wrong, and i like it 👆
Harris secures enough delegates to win Democratic nomination
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Missed this post;that graph-paper brain of yours. You gotta zoom out and look at the big picture, and definitely stop trusting the polls. Wait until the sexist/racist attacks heat up. Trump is going to appear a raging senile grandpa trying to ruin thanksgiving, and Harris will be cool as a cucumber and take him down. It'll be frickin wonderful. Many months back I hoped it would be Michelle Obama to do this, and she sure as shit could, but I'll gladly settle for this
I don't pay a massive amount of attention to polls, as calling people on the phone who are willing to spend 6-12 minutes answering yes, no, likely, not-likely generally nets you boomers. But polls are okay for a feel of the area.
Then I also remembered that Trump won huge in 2020 with boomers and older, and a shit-ton of them died in the last 4 years due to being old. Now if we can fire up and get the lazy 18-26 olds to go out and vote.
The racism and sexism has already begun on day one. eg Republican House member Tim Burchett (TN) called Harris a "DEI hire", then doubled down on it. Implying that she didn't get to where she is due to her own merit, but because of her sex and skin color 🙂
I think Biden picked her on merit, but due to how the American system works, bribery is considered a merit and Biden ignored that aspect. In a weird way, Burchett is right that she didn't have enough merit to be VP because she wasn't another one of those diode in the wall bribery candidates that Biden could have easily picked. Obama believes Biden has been the most influential and progressive president since LBJ (this includes himself, btw).
We are up against a crowd threatening civil war and chanting fight. Anyone voting for that is truly lost.
Originally posted by FalconPaunch!
I think Biden picked her on merit, but due to how the American system works, bribery is considered a merit and Biden ignored that aspect. In a weird way, Burchett is right that she didn't have enough merit to be VP because she wasn't another one of those diode in the wall bribery candidates that Biden could have easily picked. Obama believes Biden has been the most influential and progressive president since LBJ (this includes himself, btw).
Harris had more professional accolades under her belt in 2020 than Trump did in 2016 and his VP Vance does now. eg Vance wrote a book and has been in office since 2023.
Originally posted by RobtardTrump's playing a Willy Wonka, where if he picks a mature senator, they'd want to run the country their way, but Charlie Bucket will do it the Wonka way.
Harris had more professional accolades under her belt in 2020 than Trump did in 2016 and his VP Vance does now. eg Vance wrote a book and has been in office since 2023.
I think Eisenhower did the same thing with Nixon. When asked what did Nixon do to contribute, he said, "I don't quite know yet, give me a while and I'm sure I'll think of something."
Th-th-th-that was just a facetious remark. ermm
Originally posted by FalconPaunch!This is a long one because your post contained an exceptional amount of incorrect, idiotic, nonsensical and slanderous material. Of course sexuality is a part of your identity and everyone else's. You don't understand how words work, you are so stupid that you don't even know basic definitions (so why am I bothering to talk to this primordial sludge for a ****in brain again?) of basic ****ing words like ****ing "identity", holy shit. "I think identity means—" SHUT THE **** UP AND LEARN THE REAL DEFINITIONS YOU ****ING CRUSTPICKLER. YOU NEED TO GO BACK TO ****ING GRADE SCHOOL.
Your sexuality really isn't a significant part of your identity -- anyone's identity. Your writing skills would be a much more interesting thing to discuss and focus on, and would gather up respect.Some women have longer ring fingers than index fingers, which is a masculine trait and vice versa. It doesn't change your chromosomes.
Not the case at all. Just a google search will show you a lot of transgender women winning medals and breaking records and female athletes are furious. Lia Thomas is probably the most famous, but there's also Austin Killips, Quinn and Nikki Hiltz. I'm also willing to bet Caitlin Jenner would still break records in female competitions.
You talk about logic and compassion only to call me an incel, a obsessed whiner and a paedotard. 🙄
Truth be told, most cisgender people don't give a shit. The prejudice people you're thinking of are prejudice to a lot more than trans people and I'm not one of them. I don't think a male rapist should go to a woman's prison because he identifies as a woman, but you're probably of the opinion that that's somehow anti-trans rights and not me wanting to protect women, even if they're convicts.
You're not pro-trans, you're butthurt that straight women didn't like you in school. I didn't have a girlfriend in school, but I focused on my intelligence, talent, humour and probably most importantly, having an attractive muscly body. Guess what. I got laid and continue to do so. If anyone's an incel here, it's you.
I WANT TO KNOW HOW THE **** YOU GOT SO STUPID BC IT FEELS LIKE YOU PUT EFFORT INTO BEING THE WORLDS'S DUMBEST ****ING PIECE OF SHIT.[i]
"Identity is the set of qualities, beliefs, personality traits, appearance, and/or expressions that characterize a person or a group."
That very much includes sexuality, gender, sex; it also includes political beliefs and religion. You seem to think you can just make up your own definitions of things by saying them. Sorry, I use dictionary and encyclopedia definitions, not a version made up by a human "Your sexuality really isn't a significant part of your identity" — yes it is, by every official definition that matters, sexuality is a bore aspect of identity. "Writer" can be a part of someone's identity, is that what you were trying to say? It's hard to tell when speaking to someone with the emotipnal and intellectual intelligence of a toilet sponge. An identity isn't something you choose yourself, it's just the sum of your characteristics. Like I said yesterday, in a post you didn't read because it was too long and hard too many hard words: I am not "nonbinary" because I "identify" that way, I am nonbinary because my physical sexual biology is constructed of both male and female aspects, which can be very simply described as "nonbinary", which literally means "not of the established binary". This is not complicated postmodern gender theory, this aligns with basic models of biology.
You are afraid of language, of words. You are a bad fascist because you are incapable of appreciating the beauty of language and literature. You live in a squat, feeble world of fantastical definitions and abstract images and things that mean whatever you want them to. You're way more of a Critical Theory Postmodern Marxist than me, I actually believe in the definitions of words and the way we use them to construct meaning and reality.
Chromosomes mean nothing. Ever SEEN a chromosome? Held one? Can you tell me what they do? You fascists love chromosomes but nobody can tell me what use they are other than distinguishing AGAB, which is usually easy to tell physically anyway. I've never seen my chromosomes, I never think about them. Ppl that do are pedants. Chromosomes are the transphobes favourite thing, because they don't understand that no trans person ever thinks, "God I wish I had different chromosomes". ****in chromosomes, that all you got? Never seen 'em, don't care. Having XY or XX doesn't mean you're a man or a woman, it indicates which body type you were born with. Plus, I agree roughly with biological sense and AGAB anyway, A LOT OF TRANS PPL DO (I KNOW you think we are all the same blue haired human but for once in your life don't be a ****ing shit-drenched clod of cack). The whole point of transition is that you begin as one thing and become another. I was born male and now I'm nonbinary transfem because I take HRT and have developed breasts. I'm not "male" — I don't fulfil enough categories to be male anymore, nor female. At this point, if you deny "nonbinary" as a term just bc you don't like it, too bad; that is an emotional and political position, not one of logic or rationality.
When I say "trans women are women" I am not saying "trans women are cis women". Nobody is saying that. Nobody has ever said that trans women and cis women are identical, other than retard fascists like you who pretend that trans people think trans women and cis women are the same thing. "Woman" is an umbrella term that includes cis and trans women. That does not mean they are the same. It just means they are both classed as women.
Bro okay listen, it's simple: I have compassion for the compassionate and the downtrodden, not for literal CHILD RAPISTS LIKE YOU and trans genocide advocates. You are someone I would personally put in the ground if I got the chance. Logic dictates that paedophilia is a very serious sexual fetish with a high chance of the paedophile abusing, I think we should straight up murder any paedo who brags about finding teens and preteens attractive, and especially men who invade children's spaces and try to sexually abuse them. You ARE an incel. That's a logical proposition and it's correct by definition. You are a paedophile, you are an incel. Do I feel bad for you? No. Like I say, compassion is for the compassionate; people like you who revel in the oppression of other ppl — and try to rape kids — deserve protracted, elongated deaths. Lots of torture (logical torture). No compassion for paedophiles. If I ever get my perfect future just know I'll save a spot for you.
Umm yes, trans women are allowed to win some sports. It's not unfair. Actually if you advocate for trans women losing sports idk what ur even trying to prove—pure emotional ideology. Your imaginary cherry picked fascist headlines are very compelling though I'm sure. Sadly, if you look at statistics, there is no reason to believe trans women are winning at any sports at a higher rate in comparison to their attendance numbers more or less than cis women. If a trans woman never won, that'd be weirder, wouldn't it? Are we just NOT allowed to win at all, in any sport? Or ever? I'm sure you'd like to see us sidelined.
Also I already fact checked your fascist ass on this one but TRANS WOMEN ARE BIOLOGICALLY WEAKER THAN CIS WOMEN and GENERALLY INFERIOR TO CIS WOMEN AT SPORTS due to muscle atrophy from HRT, something cis women don't get. Doesn't matter if you were a jacked man before, welcome to toothpick wrists and non-existent guns. Are you hearing this? You can look this up, and not just on "WOMENFIRST MAG" / Breitbart / "PROTECTING AMERICA FROM LEFTIST DEGENERACY STATESMAN" (a few of Blakemore's favoured jounals). This is the problem, and why I won't be replying to you for much longer: YOU HAVE NO INTEREST TO LEARN OR CHANGE OR ADAPT. You will not even try. You will read article after article about how JK Rowlings really good innit; have you EVER read ANYTHING by a trans person that wasn't one of mine or Eon_Blue's posts? It's time you stopped pretending to be a leftist and come out fully as a transphobe because it encompasses your interest in the subject, you want to be close-minded, you want to be bigoted, you do not have a desire to change or become a better person.
https://nwlc.org/once-and-for-all-this-is-why-we-support-trans-women-and-girls-in-sports/
^ here's a link. You can be a filthy little transphobe and spit on it as "woke propaganda" if you like, or be a ****ing human being, pull your head out of the sewage pipe and try to understand something [i]not from your perspective. (Very difficult challenge; requires basic empathy)
OK but what if the trans woman rapist raped a man? Would you still send them to the men's prison? Bc that hella sounds like you're saying "I'm fine with men being raped, only women can't get raped" if so. Doesn't sound like you worked this one out by using logic; sounds like once again you took a pre-existing opinion from 4chan or Breitbart and just decided you believed it too. You really don't have ANY idea how logic works, do you? ALL your arguments are based on emotion, not reason. Trans women in women's prisons are more scare stories for the insecure of gender and limited of actual penal knowledge and understanding. Most trans women aren't rapists; most trans woman criminals aren't violent. Trans women belong in women's prisons because they WILL get raped in men prison. But again, I doubt you care about that. Your argument is based around protecting cis women prisoners against trans female rapists. But at the same time you fully admit you don't care about male-on-male rape, transfem-on-male or male-on-transfem. You don't actually care about humanity and the majority of people, you just want to enforce your binary at any cost and feel good about it. Even the cost of innocent lives. Even genocide.
Like man, come on, they are trying to put trans and queer ppl in camps right now, and I KNOW you will support it when it happens. You will be SO happy when I am finally carted away to the gas chambers. You want us dead like the rest of them, I can hear it in your words. You don't understand how easy it is to spot fascists: they literally ALL use the same talking points; the ones you use. You aren't being sneaky, pretending to be a leftist and then slipping in Tim Pool like nobody would notice. "Check out this cool article on trannies passes you a document titled WE ARE GOING TO GENOCIDE TRANS PEOPLE uhh yeah it's kind of a centrist, dissident right kind of angle. very illuminating"
The last paragraph of your post is just a personal attack on me, for no reason. Not surprising, you don't have much actual material, do you? Once again it is full of falsehood, slander, lies, and gibberish: the right winger's breakfast. So let's mythbust Andrew "The Drooling Spastic" Szlamp's accusations about me in school. First up, I wasn't into many girls in school and I was scared of sex to the point I thought I was asexual. I didn't even WANT to have sex until I was 18, when I did. I even had many chances to have sex prior and didn't take them because I wanted it to be right. In school I mostly only liked one girl for the entire five years. I didn't want to have sex with her, the thought didn't cross my mind. What I really wanted, and this I knew from when I was 11, was that I wanted to BE her, too. She was ideal as a girlfriend and as a model of what I could be. I guess you didn't know that bc you assumed I had a male childhood, which I didn't. You have no idea how transfem childhoods are so you once again just said I had the same experience as you: an incel. Twice now you have made massive assumptions about me and my life and have been completely incorrect, but I assume what you are saying is true of you, instead. It's nice bc contained within what you thought would be your killer line, this idea that I'm "not pro-trans but simply bitter about not having a gf in school" really sounds like you going through some shit. The thing is, Andy, you can't read people like I can. You try to read me and all you do is read yourself.
LMAO at the idea that you were buff and hot and all the girls were into you in school. ****ng lying homo faggot. Did you just make that up this second? "Yeah bro I know I'm a flabby mess now but I was TOTALLY BUFF AND GOT LAID IN SCHOOL WITH REAL GIRLS THAT TOTALLY EXISTED— except, bro, you told me on a Skype call in 2015 that you were a virgin until you paid a prostitute for sex, which means you were 18+, so yeah, you had zero sex in school. Why lie? Dishonesty is the most despicable trait in a man. I love how you keep lying, lying, lying brah but you can trick the others, but I know you too well, I was there. You told me things on Skype that you can never retract, both the thing about 14 year old girls, and also about how you lost your virginity to a hooker. You can try to make up a new life for yourself but I'll always be there to tell everyone that you're a paedophile. Btw I've seen pictures on your facebook from when you were at school, you were not buff, you looked like shit then and you still do now, you ****ing lying ***got. You can say you have sex, but ppl know what you look like, and they know you're not buff, and they know you're an UNMEDICATED SCHIZOPHRENIC, and they know you are a terminal alcoholic. You're a waste of flesh bro, top thineself and give the world a break.
You're the least essential player on earth, dog
Originally posted by ares834
I really wish Biden wouldn't drop out if it means Harris is the nominee. From bad to worse.A total shame that Biden decided to run in the first place. Had he not, we could have an actual decent candidate running.
It's not bad to worse. It's bad to better. Its the first time since 2016 we've had a choice of anyone who isn't an old white man. She is going to get some votes just because of that. I still want Michelle Obama, but Harris is way better than Biden.
One of my first thoughts of the morning:
"THE MONTHS-LONG DEMOCRAT CIRCULAR FIRING SQUAD HAS BEEN CANCELLED! HOORAY!".
Now that the Harris has the nomination locked in, Republicans are in full blown f*cking panic mode. Get ready for a massive surge in Russian troll farms. Concern trolls EVERYWHERE! They basically share your opinion...but they have some con-ssssssss-cerns🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍
"As a black American Democrat, I hate Harris's guts and felt safer under trump and so do all my black Democrat friends and family, who are totally black" *laughing in Russian*