Originally posted by Robtard
Your silly strawman aside.-Obama is a person of colour and he was POTUS
-Harris is a person of colour and she is the VP nomineeThese are just facts. Demorats will likely break another glass ceiling when Harris becomes VP and then again when Harris runs for POTUS and wins in 2024 or 2028. Get mad now.
"People of color" make up 93% of the world's human population.
Grouping 93% of the world's population under a "people of color" label is racist. There's huge variation in culture, genetics, and beliefs among those 93%.
It's also racist against the remaining 7% to emphasize 93% of the population while marginalizing the 7%.
Congrats: pushing "people of color" talking points is racist against 100% of the population.
Originally posted by Artol
I sort of get what you mean, but clearly there's a deep divide between the left wing of the Democratic party, like AOC and Sanders, and Warren and Markey to a lesser degree (and most of the voters for that matter) and the corporate neo-liberal wing of the party. And I do think conflating the left with liberals is a bit silly, and really just play into the hands of the united interests of both the Democratic and Republican party, so I think it's worthwhile to point that out.
To be fair, there's no difference between the corporate wing of the Democratic Party and any of the federally elected Democrats: there's not a single exception among any of them. It's all the same party.
Biden actually did a great job of explaining why and how when he first got elected at 29.
If I can find that vid, I'll post it.
But, basically, they have to be in bed with corporations. Even if they are against 10, they have to be for 1. It's all a "where's the cheese?" game.
Artol these stats might interest you:
"Just 10% of Twitter users produced 92% of all tweets from U.S. adults since last November, and 69% of these highly prolific users identify as Democrats or Democratic-leaning independents."
I am all for small and medium sized businesses, they are the backbone of any economy. When they become huge corporations that are completely in the control of pricks like Bezos or Musk, then I think it's gone wrong.
I agree with you, we as a nation would have been MUCH better off with a Yang, Tulsi or Bernie as president. We NEED to reign in large corporations, not just for the US but for the health of the World.
Originally posted by snowdragonThe world is better with anyone but Trump, so is most of the US as we are about to see. I have faith in the majority of Americans.
I agree with you, we as a nation would have been MUCH better off with a Yang, Tulsi or Bernie as president. We NEED to reign in large corporations, not just for the US but for the health of the World.
Originally posted by dadudemon
"People of color" make up 93% of the world's human population.Grouping 93% of the world's population under a "people of color" label is racist. There's huge variation in culture, genetics, and beliefs among those 93%.
It's also racist against the remaining 7% to emphasize 93% of the population while marginalizing the 7%.
Congrats: pushing "people of color" talking points is racist against 100% of the population.
that's not how words work
Originally posted by Surtur
Artol these stats might interest you:[b]"Just 10% of Twitter users produced 92% of all tweets from U.S. adults since last November, and 69% of these highly prolific users identify as Democrats or Democratic-leaning independents."
So about 10% of Twitter users are progressive narcissists?