Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
https://youtu.be/srXsDyu9mYEWhoa... things aren't looking too good for the prosecution in Rittenhouse case. 🙂
Yeah, it's the funniest thing I'll seen all week.
When the guy you shot says it was self defense, it's time for a double face palm. 😂
Originally posted by cdtmNot what happened.
Yeah, it's the funniest thing I'll seen all week.When the guy you shot says it was self defense, it's time for a double face palm. 😂
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae"Even more revealing was their attachment to slavery. Among the enlistees in 1861, slightly more than one in ten owned slaves personally. This compared favorably to the Confederacy as a whole, in which one in every twenty white persons owned slaves. Yet more than one in every four volunteers that first year lived with parents who were slaveholders. Combining those soldiers who owned slaves with those soldiers who lived with slaveholding family members, the proportion rose to 36 percent. That contrasted starkly with the 24.9 percent, or one in every four households, that owned slaves in the South, based on the 1860 census. Thus, volunteers in 1861 were 42 percent more likely to own slaves themselves or to live with family members who owned slaves than the general population."
You're not wrong. Overwhelming number of soldiers who fought for South didn't give a damn about slavery.
"The attachment to slavery, though, was even more powerful. One in every ten volunteers in 1861 did not own slaves themselves but lived in households headed by non family members who did. This figure, combined with the 36 percent who owned or whose family members owned slaves, indicated that almost one of every two 1861 recruits lived with slaveholders. Nor did the direct exposure stop there. Untold numbers of enlistees rented land from, sold crops to, or worked for slaveholders. In the final tabulation, the vast majority of the volunteers of 1861 had a direct connection to slavery. For slaveholder and nonslaveholder alike, slavery lay at the heart of the Confederate nation."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/61136/
Originally posted by cdtm
https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-9f30553ac9127a7962677936938ce1d5
But Greta said it's good !
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
That would only account for 1 of the charges. The attempted murder one.
Probably the only charge that will stick is the "unlawful possession of a firearm" one.
The rest of the prosecution's case is very shaky. It's highly unlikely he'll be found guilty on the murder charge, as he shouldn't be as it is a clear cut case of self-defense.
Oh, and lol@ anyone who thinks Tim Pool is part of the racist alt-right.... or hell, even part of the real right. He is a classical liberal.
Originally posted by Robtard
Stop lying, okay.He's a Rightist who pretends to be a center-left centrist. Though he's openly admitted to voting for Trump and supporting Rightwing politics. He's a classic, "both sides are bad, but let me tell you just how shitty the Left is, they're the worst!" spinning fool.
No, you stop lying, okay.
He is not a right-winger, robbie.