Trump was willing to halt criminal investigations as 'favor' to dictators

Started by Surtur4 pages
Originally posted by Scribble
I suppose, but I don't think that necessarily indicates if he's being honest or not. The book's like 600-odd pages long — if it was a cash grab, it'd be 200-300 max.

How is it not a cash grab when he could have come and testified but chose not to do so? But is willing to spill it all in a book?

A valid point. These silly "tell all" books tend to be very short and written by a ghost writer who juice shit it with input from the person for a quick buck.

Not valid in the face of the opportunity to testify and refusal to do so though, sorry Rob

I’m glad we finally all came to a valid consensus. He totally stonewalled Congress then wrote this short book for fame and money

Originally posted by Surtur
How is it not a cash grab when he could have come and testified but chose not to do so? But is willing to spill it all in a book?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
I’m glad we finally all came to a valid consensus. He totally stonewalled Congress then wrote this short book for fame and money

Are you forgetting that Trump blocked Bolton in the Senate? Then all but two Republican Senators voted against Bolton testifying? How are you forgetting this?

Honestly, Trump and the Senate Republicans set themselves up to only make Bolton's claims now seem legit.

Originally posted by Robtard
Are you forgetting that Trump blocked Bolton in the Senate? Then all but two Republican Senators voted against Bolton testifying? How are you forgetting this?

Honestly, Trump and the Senate Republicans set themselves up to only make Bolton's claims now seem legit.

Are you forgetting he could have testified in the House? How are you forgetting this? Where is that legendary memory?

Originally posted by Surtur
Are you forgetting he could have testified in the House? How are you forgetting this? Where is that legendary memory?

Trump blocked Bolton using the powers of the POTUS. The House Democrats would have had to subpoena, then Trump would have sued and it would have gone on forever. Keep imagining though.

Ah so that is the excuse you're gonna use now. Okay, I'll allow it.

After all, there was no rush...(unless u wanted to cash in on a book and didn't feel like waiting)

Originally posted by Surtur
How is it not a cash grab when he could have come and testified but chose not to do so? But is willing to spill it all in a book?
I don't know, all that legal stuff goes right over my head. It all seems pretty strange, we'll have to see how it turns out, I guess. It's surprising how many enemies Trump has made in the ranks of the GOP though, like everyone seems to have a Trump book now.

@surtur How you conveniently forget: Trump falsely claims House Democrats 'never' asked Bolton to testify

House investigators did ask Bolton to testify during the impeachment inquiry last fall, but he declined to testify on instructions from the White House and said he would only testify pursuant to a subpoena if a court weighed in on the issue. The House never subpoenaed Bolton, likely to avoid a drawn-out court battle. -snip

Trump blocked Bolton using the powers of the POTUS

Originally posted by Scribble
I don't know, all that legal stuff goes right over my head. It all seems pretty strange, we'll have to see how it turns out, I guess. It's surprising how many enemies Trump has made in the ranks of the GOP though, like everyone seems to have a Trump book now.

Gotta look at the context, they can shove any insane claim they want into the book(probably why Bolton's is so long) and since it's Trump(and especially in the current atmosphere) you'll always have someone who will believe it and the media will dutifully give you a bunch of interviews, etc. if you have a trump bashing book. Left wing media will act like these stories are true even as they tiptoe around it by saying he "allegedly" did these things.

Originally posted by Surtur
Gotta look at the context, they can shove any insane claim they want into the book(probably why Bolton's is so long) and since it's Trump(and especially in the current atmosphere) you'll always have someone who will believe it and the media will dutifully give you a bunch of interviews, etc. if you have a trump bashing book. Left wing media will act like these stories are true even as they tiptoe around it by saying he "allegedly" did these things.
Yeah, I mean tbf I've got to a point where I'm believing very little anymore. I'm trying to follow my intellectual instincts atm in the face of the overwhelming chaos of modern information exchange.

In this case, from what I know so far (which isn't all that much), I wouldn't be surprised if at least some of what's contained in Bolton's book is true.

But yeah, the left-wing MSM will eat it all up regardless of veracity.

Originally posted by Scribble
Yeah, I mean tbf I've got to a point where I'm believing very little anymore. I'm trying to follow my intellectual instincts atm in the face of the overwhelming chaos of modern information exchange.

In this case, from what I know so far (which isn't all that much), I wouldn't be surprised if at least some of what's contained in Bolton's book is true.

But yeah, the left-wing MSM will eat it all up regardless of veracity.

Some could be true, who knows. Problem is Bolton's actions have made it impossible to say what is true or not based on his word alone.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Can we stop creating threads like these and put them into their master threads?

All racism threads into one thread.

All pro-anti Trump stuff in the Trump thread.

^ I agree with this sentiment. Unless it's something fairly huge which needs it's own thread so it can be focused on, we should stop buttfcking the GDF with new threads.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Can we stop creating threads like these and put them into their master threads?

All racism threads into one thread.

All pro-anti Trump stuff in the Trump thread.

Originally posted by Robtard
^ I agree with this sentiment. Unless it's something fairly huge which needs it's own thread so it can be focused on, we should stop buttfcking the GDF with new threads.
I said this in that thread where I was called a deluded moron lmao

I am prepared to go along with this DDM, can you keep Broly and Ethneo in line?

Originally posted by Scribble
I said this in that thread where I was called a deluded moron lmao

-You were deluded for believing Broly's excuse/blame-shifting.

-You weren't deluded in saying we should cease with the new thread vomiting.

I'm going to do my part in regards to not making a new thread unless it's something new or something that has a similar thread but is huge.

Hell Bolton could have gone on CNN and said these things. He could have written an op-ed and said these things.

He chose instead to write a tell all book. Tells us all we really need to know

Originally posted by Robtard
-You were deluded for believing Broly's excuse/blame-shifting.

-You weren't deluded in saying we should cease with the new thread vomiting.

I'm going to do my part in regards to not making a new thread unless it's something new or something that has a similar thread but is huge.

I will go along with this as well for the sake of the forum if DDm can keep Broly and Flystar in line.

Originally posted by Robtard
-You were deluded for believing Broly's excuse/blame-shifting.

-You weren't deluded in saying we should cease with the new thread vomiting.

I'm going to do my part in regards to not making a new thread unless it's something new or something that has a similar thread but is huge.

And you were deluded for reporting only TI when Whirly was doing the exact same thing, something you have now correctly pointed out is annoying all-round. Does that sound fair?