Originally posted by Surtur
It's true the earth is 12. I mean I saw a dinosaur like 6 years ago.
Well, there are many people who have claimed to have seen the Lochness Monster over in Scotland.
I've also heard lots of stories of people seeing Teradactyls (not sure if I spelled that correctly)over in India. Not sure if they're actually classified as being dinos as well.
So it's possible that a few of them may even still exist. No, I have no problem admitting I don't believe they lived 65 million years ago because I don't even believe in "millions of years", let alone billions.
Now comes the" hahahaha you're so retarded that you don't believe the earth is billions of years old! This proves you don't believe in science , ya dummy!"BS argument from people like pooty who is still too damn scared to even debate Hovind.
Must have a really weak argument if he is too scared to take on an old, tired man lol.
Pterodactyl's are what you mean.
But then do you think carbon dating and all these other ways we test things to determine age are just not accurate? I agree nothing can be perfect, but why would they be off by millions and millions of years?
A new study apparently confirmed the universe is 13.8 billion years old.
Originally posted by Surtur
Pterodactyl's are what you mean.But then do you think carbon dating and all these other ways we test things to determine age are just not accurate? I agree nothing can be perfect, but why would they be off by millions and millions of years?
A new study apparently confirmed the universe is 13.8 billion years old.
A new study confirmed it, yes, I'm sure. You see though, they are constantly "updating" the age of the earth and the universe and it's almost like, yes, their methods of measuring it are not very reliable. In fact, I know they're not. If their methods were as accurate as you claim they wouldn't have to keep updating the age by billions of years lol .
I'm sure there is nothing in that article you listed that I haven't already heard dozens of times from evolutionists debating Hovind and read in different places online. I just don't agree with their interpretation of the data.
I seem to remember us having a brief conversation on this before and I seem to remember posting several links to creation science websites that laid out the many reasons why the earth couldn't possibly be nearly as old as mainstream science says it is.
I still stand by all of that. My opinion hasn't changed.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
A new study confirmed it, yes, I'm sure. You see though, they are constantly "updating" the age of the earth and the universe and it's almost like, yes, their methods of measuring it are not very reliable. In fact, I know they're not. If their methods were as accurate as you claim they wouldn't have to keep updating the age by billions of years lol .I'm sure there is nothing in that article you listed that I haven't already heard dozens of times from evolutionists debating Hovind and read in different places online. I just don't agree with their interpretation of the data.
I seem to remember us having a brief conversation on this before and I seem to remember posting several links to creation science websites that laid out the many reasons why the earth couldn't possibly be nearly as old as mainstream science says it is.
I still stand by all of that. My opinion hasn't changed.
13.8 billion was the estimated guess, but this apparently confirmed it.
As our technology advances things do change.
My question is why aren't there a bunch of historical accounts of people fighting off dinosaurs then?
the Trumpers are so triggered even by very moderate guys like Sam. They seem almost desperate right now and I only think its going to get worse. Trump has his base of racists and whack jobs who we see in minutiae here at KMC. If Biden plays it right Trumps playing to those whack jobs will alienate more and more on the fence. He can take out all the facebook microads he wants the Kpop and tick tock kids have his number. They are going to **** him up.