The Rights Struggle with Science.

Originally posted by Surtur
Time to show how much the left truly appreciates science, some articles about David Shor, fired for sharing data from a study(conducted by a black man no less):

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/06/case-for-liberalism-tom-cotton-new-york-times-james-bennet.html

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/06/stop-firing-innocent/613615/

Time to show how much the left appreciates historical fact:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/not-the-way-to-do-history-princeton-university-historian-blasts-1619-project-as-historical-sloppiness-unworthy-of-pulitzer

https://reason.com/2020/03/06/1619-project-fact-checker-nikole-hannah-jones-leslie-harris/

I encourage folk not to die on this hill

Since the page flipped, people shouldn't miss out on this embrace of data and facts.

See, this is the difference between me and Surtur. He posts media articles which could well be "fake news" and I post an actual scientific journal.

Originally posted by Blakemore
https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/1097-0142(19850401)55:7%3C1607::AID-CNCR2820550733%3E3.0.CO;2-0 It's a testicular cancerous lump on her fallopean tube.Not all cancers are the same.

Originally posted by dadudemon
In the oncology world, cancer names refer to the cells that are cancerous.

So you can get lung cancer in your arm, testicular cancer in your liver, etc.

Also, some deformities present with women with "internal testes." They develop both ovaries and testes. So it's possible to get testicular cancer as a human female. Very rare possibility, but it's possible.

There isn't anything fake. David Shor posted a link to a study(done by a black man) that showed violent riots do not increase the democrat vote they decrease it.

He was fired over this.

Originally posted by Blakemore
DDM gets it.

He does, just like I'm sure he gets that when people were getting triggered over the cervical cancer claims or that when activists scream "women can get testicular cancer" he knows they are not referring to "well you see in the world of oncology you can have lung cancer in your arm". He knows the reason they are doing it has zero to do with science and that it is the same reason they say some men can get pregnant or that some men have periods.

Originally posted by Surtur
He does, just like I'm sure he gets that when people were getting triggered over the cervical cancer claims or that when activists scream "women can get testicular cancer" he knows they are not referring to "well you see in the world of oncology you can have lung cancer in your arm". He knows the reason they are doing it has zero to do with science and that it is the same reason they say some men can get pregnant or that some men have periods.

Yeah, when people say that they generally mean that a person that identifies themselves as a man (or is seen as a man by their community) can have a uterus. People generally refer to trans people when they say things like that. It’s sort of a way to signal that you take trans issues seriously.

Originally posted by Surtur
There isn't anything fake. David Shor posted a link to a study(done by a black man) that showed violent riots do not increase the democrat vote they decrease it.

He was fired over this.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lets explore this: what about my post was "tough" ?

Originally posted by Surtur
Nah, I'm not one. So don't even try going that route.

Implying there would be a consequence. Feels like you've been throwing around a few passive aggressive comments recently, it also feels like this issue has you up in arms somewhat. My initial post was in the hope that you'd chill out, I mean I can't see how it affects you if women and men can get cancers that they aren't 'supposed' to get, (unless you were to get one yourself obviously) don't know what it is about this issue that has irked you particularly.

Originally posted by samhain
Implying there would be a consequence. Feels like you've been throwing around a few passive aggressive comments recently, it also feels like this issue has you up in arms somewhat. My initial post was in the hope that you'd chill out, I mean I can't see how it affects you if women and men can get cancers that they aren't 'supposed' to get, (unless you were to get one yourself obviously) don't know what it is about this issue that has irked you particularly.

The only consequence would be you embarrassing yourself since I have no mod power and even if i did it's not ban worthy, but I'm game then:

Quote my post about cervical cancer that shows a meltdown, then explain why it's a meltdown.

Originally posted by Blakemore
My link has 14 scientific references.

Okay and yet what happened to Shor hasn't changed. Fired for sharing a study.

It's just a ****ing news article.

Lol did you want scientists to write an academic paper about his firing? Put the booze down.

Originally posted by Surtur
The only consequence would be you embarrassing yourself since I have no mod power and even if i did it's not ban worthy, but I'm game then:

Quote my post about cervical cancer that shows a meltdown, then explain why it's a meltdown.

So it wasn't a passive threat, you were just concerned about me and my mental well being, fair enough.

Your multiple, consecutive posts and some of the attitude displayed in them, (the equivalencies conveying a mocking tone for example) indicate that this issue has gotten under your skin a little, if I'm wrong then I apologize.

Originally posted by samhain
So it wasn't a passive threat, you were just concerned about me and my mental well being, fair enough.

Your multiple, consecutive posts and some of the attitude displayed in them, (the equivalencies conveying a mocking tone for example) indicate that this issue has gotten under your skin a little, if I'm wrong then I apologize.

No I wasn't threatening you.

It didn't get under my skin, I was using it to show the other sides struggles too.

I don't think I made consecutive posts about the cervical thing, a discussion got started. I did later do a blinded me with science bit of posts, but mostly in a row cuz edit buttons don't always work.

No need to apologize it can be hard to tell intent online.

Originally posted by samhain
So it wasn't a passive threat, you were just concerned about me and my mental well being, fair enough.

Your multiple, consecutive posts and some of the attitude displayed in them, (the equivalencies conveying a mocking tone for example) indicate that this issue has gotten under your skin a little, if I'm wrong then I apologize.

Can’t worry about science. They’re too busy thinking the earth is 46 years old.

News article references one guy" OMG its fact!
academic paper has 14 direct respectable sources "lol, i wanna talk about racism instead"

Can’t worry about science. They’re too busy thinking the earth is 46 years old

And flat

Originally posted by BackFire
Can’t worry about science. They’re too busy thinking the earth is 46 years old.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
And flat

Originally posted by BackFire
Can’t worry about science. They’re too busy thinking the earth is 46 years old.

The earth is 12 years old man

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
The earth is 12 years old man

Makes sense why Trump's trying to fvck it over now.