of course it doesn't matter how much torque a truck generates. I'm just saying that a rope doesn't have torque simply because it can pull a truck that does. It was a throwaway attribute. Could've easily been a CB, or windows, or a starter. The POINT is that there is no direct comparison between the strengths/attributes of the truck and rope simply because the rope can be used to pull it. Because that's EXACTLY your reasoning with the chains.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
A truck would do the pulling, the trailer would make the cargo roll easier and the rope would give link to the trailer to give it momentum to move
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
What does "getting stronger" have to do with "each stronger and faster than you" as the liar claimed?
Lol... they were getting one hit by Aquaman and Hawkman. What does getting stronger does, make it possible for them to take 2 hits? Beings that are more powerful and beyond Supermans comprehension. Now this is funny.
Originally posted by Magnon
On the object being hauled? The rope.
whatever is doing the pulling applies the initial impulse, not the rope. The rope transfers that impulse (t1-->t2) to the object being pulled. The rope is the object transferring the impulse, not the one creating it 🤦🏿‍♂️
The rope has no force of its own. It's tensile strength, however, does determine whether the force is transfered to the object being pulled or whether the rope snaps
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
whatever is doing the pulling applies the initial impulse, not the rope. The rope transfers that impulse (t1-->t2) to the object being pulled. The rope is the object transferring the impulse, not the one creating it 🤦🏿‍♂️The rope has no force of its own. It's tensile strength, however, does determine whether the force is transfered to the object being pulled or whether the rope snaps
Originally posted by Magnon
Wrong. It is the rope that applies the force on the object that is being hauled (after all, these are contact forces we are talking about); this force is equal to the tension in the rope. As long as the tension (and thus, the force applied on the object) is below the (ultimate) tensile strength of the rope it will not break.
Aaaaaaand WHERE DOES THE ROPE GET ITS FORCE? 🤔🤔🤔🤔 From the object pulling.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Aaaaaaand WHERE DOES THE ROPE GET ITS FORCE? 🤔🤔🤔🤔 From the object pulling.
The initial pulling force is irrelevant to the toughness of the rope.
The pulling object applies a force to the rope, the rope then applies a force to the pulled object. The object that the rope pulls is applying the same force on to the rope but in the opposite direction. Therefore the rope is experiencing tension force.
For example, if Hulk is pulling a planet massive object (assume he has leverage) with a rope then the planetary massive object is also pulling the rope, but in the opposite direction, at the same force Hulk is pulling. Therefore the rope has to have planetary tensile strength or it will break.
In conclusion, one needs to have more than planetary strength to break the rope.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvilare you serious? So you can attach a string or a long hair to truck and a car and tow the car because the truck is supplying the power? Man i bet you have a buzzer on your arm that reminds you when to breath.
Aaaaaaand WHERE DOES THE ROPE GET ITS FORCE? 🤔🤔🤔🤔 From the object pulling.
Originally posted by h1a8you should have seen the arguments they originally made to ease their butthurt. Everything was debunked and now they are in denial calling the villain a liar and that the chains weren’t as strong as he said because he was lying. Hilarious now they can question the truthfulness of a feat they don’t like.
😂That's better than I can explain to him.
Originally posted by Diesldude
are you serious? So you can attach a string or a long hair to truck and a car and tow the car because the truck is supplying the power? Man i bet you have a buzzer on your arm that reminds you when to breath.
That's not even remotely what I said. The only thing worse than talking to someone wrong is when that person is ignorantly cocksure in their wrongness. It's really becoming more and more clear that you have no idea what my point is despite me explaining it numerous times 🤦🏿‍♂️
Originally posted by h1a8
The initial pulling force is irrelevant to the toughness of the rope.The pulling object applies a force to the rope, the rope then applies a force to the pulled object. The object that the rope pulls is applying the same force on to the rope but in the opposite direction. Therefore the rope is experiencing tension force.
For example, if Hulk is pulling a planet massive object (assume he has leverage) with a rope then the planetary massive object is also pulling the rope, but in the opposite direction, at the same force Hulk is pulling. Therefore the rope has to have planetary tensile strength or it will break.
In conclusion, one needs to have more than planetary strength to break the rope.
I read your first sentence then stopped. You're still talking about something COMPLETELY DIFFERENT than I was. Yeah, work on comprehension.