DarkSaint85
Bonified abstract
Originally posted by -Pr-
Okay, full disclosure, I was being a bit pedantic. So I'll lay it out:I don't consider Thor to be in Superman's bracket anymore. Not since DC essentially jumped the shark with the character.
Would I consider Thor to be Aquaman's superior though? Yes.
Do I consider Diana and J'onn to be Aquaman's superior in terms of pure strength? No. Not by any massive degree. Aquaman's super strength isn't a Geoff Johns invention. He just focused on it far more than any writer had in years.
I would argue he's definitely in the bracket of Diana and J'onn, but below Shazam and Thor, who are below Superman.
Then that's all well and good, and Philo seems to be making a good showcase of Aquaman's strength (which is why, tbh, you should be supporting this thread as an Aquaman fan - not because I am saying you would be biased, but in the context that it is highlighting AM's strength feats for those of us who don't know them).
Originally posted by Newjak
Maybe I am incorrect but given the fact you were acting like you didn't understand the intention of this thread it led me to have doubts.
Whilst Philo can be aggressive and yes, wants to show that Thor is sh1t, I honestly thought that Thor would have more feats. Whatever Philo's intentions, I just wanted to see scans.
Like, celey/Rage/Dambo, hell even Carver, would be on this like a ton of bricks and we'd have a good back and forth of scans I had not seen, with scans not seen by most of us who don't keep up with the characters.
If there aren't, then whatever. If all Thor has are those two feats, then so be it. I thought Stilt and Philo were just being d1cks, lol - but haven't seen anything from Thor's camp to support that stance (in THIS instance, anyway).