The Next Supreme Court Justice

Originally posted by Silent Master
He doesn't know.

Yup it's clear he doesn't. Which is telling.

@Backfire I would also say that the term has no real concern on the spirit of the conversation.

Originally posted by Newjak
Let's see a discussion on whether court packing is a meaningful comparison of the GOP doing everything in their power to fill court seats, even if it makes them hypocrites, to the democrats adding additional seats.

Vs

A term that had been traditionally used by conservatives as a means to deprive certain citizens of their basic human rights.

Yeah clearly case of apples to apples here.

No wonder I turned away from conservatism and the Republican party in the US.

Either words matter or they do not. You can't have it both ways. I don't care what you choose, but it's time to make a choice 👆

Originally posted by Newjak
@Backfire I would also say that the term has no real concern on the spirit of the conversation.

Then pick a different term, problem solved 👆

Originally posted by Silent Master
He doesn't know.

Originally posted by Surtur
Yup it's clear he doesn't. Which is telling.

I had already noted it in here. Care to try again?

Originally posted by Surtur
Either words matter or they do not. You can't have it both ways. I don't care what you choose, but it's time to make a choice 👆

😉

Originally posted by Surtur
Then pick a different term, problem solved 👆

Originally posted by Surtur
At the end of the day they can't have it both ways. They can't have it mean adding new seats and then all of a sudden it means just playing politics to fill vacant seats, etc. That in itself is a weasel tactic so it makes them crying about Mitch being a weasel seem hypocritical too.

Especially not after they just threw a hissy fit over ACB using the "wrong" words. Either words matter or they do not. IMO they need to decide.

That’s not what I’m talking about. I’m just talking purely semantics it’s a strange word to use to describe making the court bigger.

Originally posted by Newjak
Or hear me out. Don't go on a tirade and distract from the topic over a trivial term 😉

It's all he has now that his points have been sodomized by facts.

Originally posted by Newjak
Or hear me out. Don't go on a tirade and distract from the topic over a trivial term 😉

^Same side that went on a tirade over sexual preference will not be saying this.

So yeah: choose a new word. Which word would you like to use?

Originally posted by Robtard
I had already noted it in here. Care to try again?

So note it again. Name the year, and it better not have been like over 100 years ago.

Originally posted by BackFire
That’s not what I’m talking about. I’m just talking purely semantics it’s a strange word to use to describe making the court bigger.

I mean, yeah it's strange but what ya gonna do these same folk think men have periods.

Originally posted by Robtard
It's all he has now that his points have been sodomized by facts.

It's designed as a way to ignore the spirit of the conversation so people don't have to admit to a truth they don't like.

It's similar to the Obama built the cages comment. Trump was the one that abused them and caused the problems and now he is trying to distract from that.

Lol so if it's a distraction argument why not just negate it by choosing another damn word? When will you guys learn.

And I love you noting the hypocrisy with the cages, good stuff.

Originally posted by Surtur
So note it again. Name the year, and it better not have been like over 100 years ago.

So you are ignorant of the topic. Glad you admitted that.

Sorry, you don't get to arbitrarily pick when precedents expire.

Originally posted by Robtard
So you are ignorant of the topic. Glad you admitted that.

Sorry, you don't get to arbitrarily pick when precedents expire.

Lol so I can assume yeah this happened a long time ago. It'd be sad if you were reaching back to the civil war era. Did you?

Originally posted by Newjak
Yeah this is like I said a distraction arguement.

It's designed as a way to ignore the spirit of the conversation so people don't have to admit to a truth they don't like.

It's similar to the Obama built the cages comment. Trump was the one that abused them and caused the problems and now he is trying to distract from that.

TBF, I don't expect them to use another tactic at this point.

Originally posted by Newjak
Or hear me out. Don't go on a tirade and distract from the topic over a trivial term 😉

poem offense sea rack ditch recession plane sail mug fill sight reveal gas dine lend cable stall environment wire fabricate sport amber breakdown

Do you agree?

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol so if it's a distraction argument why not just negate it by choosing another damn word? When will you guys learn.

And I love you noting the hypocrisy with the cages, good stuff.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol so I can assume yeah this happened a long time ago. It'd be sad if you were reaching back to the civil war era. Did you?

So to fix your ignorance you went back a few pages and found when I noted the timeline. Glad I could help you learn something today, Surt.

As noted, you don't get to decide when precedent expires. Also of note, courts routinely site very old rulings in modern proceedings.