Presidential debates thread!

Started by Surtur32 pages

Nobody said posts expired, that is another lie.

Why not just stop digging the hole?

Originally posted by Surtur
do not make me take screenshots of timestamps kid. It was over 6 hours.

Wow, it is like you did not even read what you were replying to.

Originally posted by Surtur
I only knew Adam responded when I saw you quoting his posts kid.

You have repeatedly lied and said I ducked out.

My advice is to stop repeating it and move on. Do not make this worse.

So you threw out a challenge and didn't bother looking back to see if it was accepted in the same day? This is the angle you want to use? 😆

Originally posted by Surtur
I only knew Adam responded when I saw you quoting his posts kid.

You have repeatedly lied and said I ducked out.

My advice is to stop repeating it and move on. Do not make this worse.

Well, now you know, so what's up?

Originally posted by Robtard
So you threw out a challenge and didn't bother looking back to see if it was accepted in the same day? This is the angle you want to use? 😆

I read the more recent pages of threads and noticed your response.

So did you want to lie again?

Originally posted by Surtur
Did you want to have a discussion about ideological consistency? Cuz we certainly can. Just say the word.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
By all means, let's.

That did not go as you planned. I am sorry this is happening to you.

I already responded: we can talk about how the democrats aren't being consistent compared to their 2016 behavior. Why keep ignoring it?

Originally posted by Surtur
I already responded: we can talk about how the democrats aren't being consistent compared to their 2016 behavior. Why keep ignoring it?

In other words, you want to change the subject. Because the issue is people morally opposed to the products of abortion being used in medical research being totally okay with it when Trump is the benefactor of the research. So which side do you want to defend, the Pro-Lifers or Trump? Pick your poison.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
In other words, you want to change the subject. Because the issue is people morally opposed to the products of abortion being used in medical research being totally okay with it when Trump is the benefactor of the research. So which side do you want to defend, the Pro-Lifers or Trump? Pick your poison.

My original comment was about discussing being consistent.

I ask one final time is that a road you want to travel down?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Wow, it is like you did not even read what you were replying to.
He never does.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
In other words, you want to change the subject. Because the issue is people morally opposed to the products of abortion being used in medical research being totally okay with it when Trump is the benefactor of the research. So which side do you want to defend, the Pro-Lifers or Trump? Pick your poison.

Surt will dance. You're wasting time.

Anyhow, Trump claims to be a Pro-Lifer as well, granted, he's not really, but it gets the Evangelicals all ginned up when he talks about abortion being "murder" and Roe V Wade being struck down.

Originally posted by Surtur
My original comment was about discussing being consistent.

I ask one final time is that a road you want to travel down?

Did I stutter?

Originally posted by Blakemore
He never does.

Lol you accuse me of not reading posts, when if people had bothered to check the time stamps that are part of every post they would have seen my claim of "over 6 hours" was correct.

My post was at 4:31pm(my time). Adam responded at 11:04pm(my time). Now I am not a scientist, but I believe the time frame there is less than 7 hours, but more than 6. So "over 6 hours" was correct.

But wait kiddies it gets even better. I wasn't even saying posts have expiration dates, I was merely pointing out that the timestamps showed I didn't "duck out".

Now we have all learned something and are better for it 🙂

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Did I stutter?

Okie dokie, so then we can discuss consistencies nice. Yeah, repubs aren't being consistent about the abortion thing.

Sort of like dems aren't being consistent about the supreme court.

I could toss out a quote about glass houses and stones if it would help you to better understand?

Originally posted by Surtur
Okie dokie, so then we can discuss consistencies nice. Yeah, repubs aren't being consistent about the abortion thing.

Sort of like dems aren't being consistent about the supreme court.

I could toss out a quote about glass houses and stones if it would help you to better understand?

This is not a Democrat/Republican issue. It is a Pro-Choice/Life issue. Care to try again?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
In other words, you want to change the subject. Because the issue is people morally opposed to the products of abortion being used in medical research being totally okay with it when Trump is the benefactor of the research. So which side do you want to defend, the Pro-Lifers or Trump? Pick your poison.

Trump is pro-life. And defending pro-lifers is not a poison at all because our position needs no defending.

Abortion is murder... nothing anyone from your side has ever said or posted changes that, and never will.

Defending pro-abortionists is what is truly disgusting, almost as disgusting as the abortionists themselves.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Trump is pro-life. And defending pro-lifers is not a poison at all because our position needs no defending.

Abortion is murder... nothing anyone from your side has ever said or posted changes that, and never will.

Defending pro-abortionists is what is truly disgusting, almost as disgusting as the abortionists themselves.

Nobody is anti-life except lunatics. Abortion is not anti-life.

Because you're arrogant stupid ****s who want to hate and abuse women and have the right to inseminate them and tie them down to a life because you can't get laid.

Because you can't get laid?

Originally posted by Blakemore
Nobody is anti-life except lunatics. Abortion is not anti-life.

Because you're arrogant stupid ****s who want to hate and abuse women and have the right to inseminate them and tie them down to a life because you can't get laid.

Because you can't get laid?

Originally posted by Badabing
This is rule #1 for KMC:

Courtesy
Don't attack others. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Challenge others' points of view and opinions, but do so respectfully and thoughtfully ... without insult and personal attack.

There are some who think this rule doesn't apply since KMC is a "dead" forum or because it's the GDF/OTF. The rule applies, especially to those we've given a 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc. chance.

If I continue to see personal attacks based on someone's private life, and you've been given numerous chances, you will be gone for good. This includes attacks on a job, family, financial situation, hearsay rumors, sexual preference and calling people pedos/rapists. No exceptions. This also includes threats to a person.

This also means you can't harass or stalk people in private messages with those attacks and threats. The same perm ban will apply for PMs.

Forum Rules

Yep, and I've reported him.

We'll see if it does any good or not.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Trump is pro-life. And defending pro-lifers is not a poison at all because our position needs no defending.

Abortion is murder... nothing anyone from your side has ever said or posted changes that, and never will.

Defending pro-abortionists is what is truly disgusting, almost as disgusting as the abortionists themselves.

People who are Pro-Life are opposed to harvesting stem cells from the products of abortion for use in medical research in all instances. So much so, that they have even outlawed the government from funding it. Anyone who takes a drug that was developed from fetal tissue is not Pro-Life.

So Trump is not Pro-Life, and the Pro-Life groups who are opposed to this, but accept it when Trump does it, are not only not serious in their stated convictions, but are total hypocrites.