Originally posted by abhilegend
The planet was illuminated by a forgotten sun."Showings rays of light from a forgotten sun"
Planet was illuminated by a forgotten sun.
Illuminated = light up
Forgotten/forget = fail to remember.
The planet lights up by a sun they have failed to remember.
A planet that didn't have a sun thus forgets it due to only knowing darkness
Originally posted by abhilegend
Must be some shitty miniature sun. Surfer was beginning to feel the heat from Ego's core and lava.But no such thing happened from the full "star".
IF you ACTUALLY read the books you’d know he had the power of all life in the universe as an amp when he made the last star 😂😂🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️
And he literally says in his weakened state he feels everything as opposed to normal.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Planet was illuminated by a forgotten sun.
Illuminated = light up
Forgotten/forget = fail to remember.
The planet lights up by a sun they have failed to remember.
A planet that didn't have a sun thus forgets it due to only knowing darkness
Shut up idiot.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
IF you ACTUALLY read the books you’d know he had the power of all life in the universe as an amp when he made the last star 😂😂🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️And he literally says in his weakened state he feels everything as opposed to normal.
Originally posted by abhilegend
LMAO. The miniature sun parted the cloud, a different sun illuminated the planet.Shut up idiot.
THE directors cut is talking about the same thing, the one sun.
You're using directors cut which is all about one thing last I checked which is the first issue. the mini sun is the same sun that did that you troll 😂
Originally posted by abhilegend
So you are saying that Surfer was amped when he created the last star? Why are you even trying to say here troll?
Surfer was weakened
And FYI the forgotten sun part is exposition because it’s descriptive not literal. It’s only in the draft, it didn’t EVEN make it to the actual page 🤦ðŸ½â€â™‚ï¸
Originally posted by abhilegend
Look who's back. Are you here to defend Surfer roldz?
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Planet was illuminated by a forgotten sun.
Illuminated = light up
Forgotten/forget = fail to remember.
The planet lights up by a sun they have failed to remember.
A planet that didn't have a sun thus forgets it due to only knowing darkness
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
THE directors cut is talking about the same thing, the one sun.
You're using directors cut which is all about one thing last I checked which is the first issue. the mini sun is the same sun that did that you troll 😂
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Surfer was weakenedAnd FYI the forgotten sun part is exposition because it’s descriptive not literal. It’s only in the draft, it didn’t EVEN make it to the actual page 🤦ðŸ½â€â™‚ï¸
Originally posted by Ambient
Me defend? Alberto and Carver are doing just fine + I’m on board with boy blue fanboy’ism “ one shots everything “ 😏You speak as if this planet has some form of consciousness, the narration portrays the result of the climatic plot of that scene which is the illumination of the planet by a sun created by Surfer. Why would a sun already there off planet, would all of a sudden be of value to the story? Going by your portrayal, that would just make no sense.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Its Cates. He has no idea what he's doing most of the time.
Originally posted by Ambient
Lol Ok Abbi! Let’s blame it on a guy who’s been hired/employed by Marvel corporation, involved on so many marvel project and made a lot of money for his work (writing). This guy has no idea how to write at all, though I think it quite made sense but hey your the expert right 😉
Originally posted by abhilegend
Yeah, you're still an idiot. Read Thanos wins to see how much Cates doesn't knows how to write comics.
Your getting way too full of yourself Abhi!
Originally posted by Ambient
🙄 That’s very arrogant of you to call someone an idiot for not agreeing with you, and exactly what qualification do you have to judge a successful professional writer; comic or not to tell us that this writer does not know how to write a comic. Have you publish a book? Written a publish comics? I mean there is a difference between a writer not able to write a comic properly to one not liking the depiction of a comic character within a story, where the latter is just an individuals opinion and former being technical aspect of writing; grammar, spelling, sentence construction ... etc ...Your getting way too full of yourself Abhi!
And Cates is an idiot because he doesn't follows his own rules which he sets up in his work. All writers follow their own rules but Cates can't do even that. His work is literally mish mashing two or more different concepts from other writers and claim it as his own. (Thanos wins is basically Starlin's Infinity Gauntlet repackaged minus the cosmic mcguffin, Cosmic Ghost Rider who is Punisher who is ghost rider who is herald of Galactus ! Surfer with mjolnir! Thor with Power cosmic!).
Originally posted by abhilegend
I called you an idiot because I know you for years roldz. You haven't changed a bit since then.And Cates is an idiot because he doesn't follows his own rules which he sets up in his work. All writers follow their own rules but Cates can't do even that. His work is literally mish mashing two or more different concepts from other writers and claim it as his own. (Thanos wins is basically Starlin's Infinity Gauntlet repackaged minus the cosmic mcguffin, Cosmic Ghost Rider who is Punisher who is ghost rider who is herald of Galactus ! Surfer with mjolnir! Thor with Power cosmic!).
Dude! Again that’s your individual opinion, you not liking the story of that arc but that does not take away his ability to write a proper comics as oppose to your claim, “a writer who does not know how to write a proper comics.” Cates is a successful writer who has fan base like myself who enjoyed some of the comics he wrote and one of the reason why I enjoy reading some of his work is the ease at how he piece a story together, making it easier for one to understand. See I derailed this thread and choose to make the flow of the argument go this way because I jwanted to figure out why it was so difficult for you to understand what Alberto and carver presented evidence is and now it’s quite clear that it was not the lack of the writers story telling or detailed and descriptive writing but rather you not liking the flow of how the story unfolded therefore choose not to accept it because your counter argument of the evidence given makes no sense and choose to blame it on the writer.
It’s quite clear Abhi! Aight peace ✌️!
Originally posted by abhilegend
Yeah, you're still an idiot. Read Thanos wins to see how much Cates doesn't knows how to write comics.
I agree. Cates' canon has a way of disregarding established power levels to the point that it leaves the reader wondering whether he's writing about Marvel 616, and if he is, is he making things up as he goes along with his pot induced revelation of the way that he thinks the Marvel 616 universe should be. Is that shit even canon?