Originally posted by JBL
not quite. You think tanking is taking no damage or very little damage, that's not what the term tanking means. the term tanking means taking damage and still being able to function properly. Even the army use the term. The Navy use the term tanking if Mike Tyson hit me in the face and it does absolutely nothing and I start laughing, then that's no selling, now if he hits me knock me down and I get back up and still laugh, that's tanking even though it hurt like hell and I took damage but I was able to get back up and continue to fight or in other words function.
Cool, argue with celey and carver if you want 🙂
So basically we are arguing semantics.
In that case, the feat is Surfer taking attacks from A & T without dying. Am i right?
In that case, then the onus is on those to prove that it is not the norm for a herald level being to do such things. Give multiple examples where similar level beings as A & T are able to kill herald level beings with a single blast or two. Establish the norm and then we must accept the feat as a great feat.