Originally posted by Galan007I understand that, but molecule man and beyonder are two very powerful beings that are in full control of their powers, that seemed like a focused blast that was only directed at the beyonder, the beyonder himself felt the full force of that blast that's why he knew what that blast could have destroyed. By the room, the city,and not even that Galaxy being affected shows that that blast was only directed at the beyonder who felt the full brunt of that attack. The collateral damage was given by the beyonder who knew how powerful that Blast was.
But that's not the point.In that scene there was literally zero collateral damage to Owen's apartment, despite the blast itself being powerful enough to destroy several billion entire dimensions:
So only trying to gauge the blast's potency based on the amount of collateral damage it caused would be faulty in that instance.
Here is another example...
A blast from Galactus actually harmed Thanos to an extent, despite ALL the defensive shielding of his ship being in place:
...But the blast only caused very minor collateral damage to their surroundings(a small circular crater beneath Thanos, is all.)Yet in the very same series, Thanos himself(without the aid of his ship's shielding) outright tanked the close-range planetary destruction of a gas giant without skipping a beat:
So despite a lack of collateral damage in the first scene, we can still infer that the potency of Galactus's blast would have been =/> the explosion of the gas giant that Thanos tanked a few issues later.
tl;dr
Collateral damage is not always a reliable measuring stick when it comes to gauging the potency of energy attacks and such. Makes perfect sense that higher-end reality/energy manipulators would be able to concentrate and contain their attacks so that they still retain full potency, without causing any unwanted 'bleed-over' to their surroundings(ie. collateral damage.)