But you have to send the right skins in to clean up.
Don't judge me on my needs when you don't understand the intricate processes that shaped them either, that does no one any good. This is all, however, simply redundant semantics for my local community by now I don't know why I'm not being gangbanged by Keira Knightley Emma Watson and Daisy Ridley rn
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
You say that as if a.) presidents have not historically understood that their executive actions may be undone by the next president, and b.) that Trump is not an outlier who is more likely to have his executive actions undone than others.
He isn't an outlier. The US is now locked on a path where a Democrat president will undo a previous Republican president's orders regardless of whether were beneficial or not and vice versa. Just because it was "the enemy" that did it.
And as I said, Biden doesn't even have an excuse. Trump did it because he'd never get his plans passed the house.
42 in 2 weeks...
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
He isn't an outlier. The US is now locked on a path where a Democrat president will undo a previous Republican president's orders regardless of whether were beneficial or not and vice versa. Just because it was "the enemy" that did it.And as I said, Biden doesn't even have an excuse. Trump did it because he'd never get his plans passed the house.
42 in 2 weeks...
Which executive orders do you think did Biden give mostly out of spite because it was Trump that did it?
Originally posted by Artol
Which executive orders do you think did Biden give mostly out of spite because it was Trump that did it?
Executive Order on the Revision of Civil Immigration Enforcement Policies and Priorities.
Proclamation on the Termination of Emergency With Respect to the Southern Border of the United States and Redirection of Funds Diverted to Border Wall Construction
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Executive Order on the Revision of Civil Immigration Enforcement Policies and Priorities.Proclamation on the Termination of Emergency With Respect to the Southern Border of the United States and Redirection of Funds Diverted to Border Wall Construction
You don't think that's because both of those have been important campaigning points for Democrats, who believe that a border wall and the excessive policing of "illegal" immigration is both misguided and a waste of money?
One important thing to remember is that I allegedly taught myself how to express three dimensional depth using only coordinates on two dimensional graphing paper. And I allegedly have a shadowed photo of the graphing. paper I did it on. Yet it is worth scrap because priorities are only the ridiculous assertion that I'm some stigmas super deep nonsense word salad
Originally posted by Artol
You don't think that's because both of those have been important campaigning points for Democrats, who believe that a border wall and the excessive policing of "illegal" immigration is both misguided and a waste of money?
It'd be easier to not believe its simply "cuz Trump" if there was an alternative plan to address the issues. But there isn't. Much in the same way that Trump tried to immediately get rid of the Affordable Care Act "cuz Obama" without any alternative.
What is the issue you are referring to? As far as I understand it Democrats do not believe that there is an issue with immigration at all, rather with the policing of immigrant communities. Some parts of the Democratic Party did even go as far as to say ICE should be abolished, which isn't really that outlandish, since it is a relatively new agency only established under George W. Bush, and he has a pretty bad track record in foreign policy, to be honest.
What the Democrats believe doesn't have any bearing on reality. The fact that they think there's no issue with immigration is an issue in itself. By electing to do nothing about it does the opposite of the unity they proclaim to want to pursue as it basically ignores the concerns of a huge proportion of the population particularly in the border states.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0It does have bearing on the assertion that biden's only reason for curtailing the executive action is orange man bad. If the existence of the wall is genuinely anathema to Democrat beliefs then clearly they aren't vetoing it out of pure spite.
What the Democrats believe doesn't have any bearing on reality.
Originally posted by Tzeentch
It does have bearing on the assertion that biden's only reason for curtailing the executive action is orange man bad. If the existence of the wall is genuinely anathema to Democrat beliefs then clearly they aren't vetoing it out of pure spite.
They built a considerable chunk of fencing and vehicle barriers under Obama. So they clearly acknowledge that the border is an issue.
Originally posted by BackFire
There was no way a pointless and expensive border wall that doesn't actually hinder illegal immigrants was going to continue under a democrat. It was always largely unpopular among the general public anyways. Ending funding for that was one of the easiest decisions Biden made, I'm sure.
I was under the impression that a border wall cause the adverse effect...it keeps people in.
I remember reading articles on the "Trump wall" and how border walls can actually be detrimental to the elimination of illegal immigration. The theory was that people will come over the border for better oppertunites..and once they are in..they work shit jobs, make some coin and then some of immigrates go back to Mexico.
But with a wall, those migrations do not happen..people come over because of the same reason as always...but when here...they do not want to go back because its too much work/risk.
Not sure if this is true but I always thought the best way to combat illegal immigration is to help fix the issue on why it occurs.
Originally posted by Smasandian
Not sure if this is true but I always thought the best way to combat illegal immigration is to help fix the issue on why it occurs.
It is.
There's no plans to do anything beneficial though. Instead you can probably expect the same as from the Obama Administration. Namely supporting military coups like in Honduras or using aid money to fund anti government guerrilla groups like in Bolivia, over turning the election in Haiti. Or supporting the ousting of president of Paraguay. Basically keeping as much of the region in political and economic turmoil as possible so as to enable the exploitation of resources. The same as what happens in Africa and the Middle East. The only difference being where the people who flee those respective areas end up going.