Galactus (amped) vs HP Doomsday

Originally posted by -Pr-
So you want us to use a high showing as an average rather than a low one, even though both would be wrong to use?

1 low showing by characters we have no indication on how strong they are versus an entire arc with nothing but high showings for the character? If I have 8 high showings and 1 undecided showing (we have no clue how strong the person was that threw the rock), the 8 high showings IS the average. Think about it like this, Antimonitor, current version, have minimum durability showings, but, he got hit by a car that explosion was strong enough to not only separate the 3 brothers but it weakened the Monitors. Is this their average or are we just accepting highs for them?

https://ibb.co/kQQZQxc
https://ibb.co/PgC8tjx

I want to point out that Antimonitor heard the horn before the car showed up. I'm throwing that out there for a reason. Please let me know if the monitors have less than car level durability.

Didn't....didn't you do exactly that though?

Originally posted by carver9
I agree. He is one of if not the best/detailed debater here. I never denied that. I just know he loves DC, so I double check every now and then. This still didnt answer my question on how the 3 that was amplified to one being got taken out AND SIGNIFICANTLY weakened by a Honda accord.

And got called out?

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Because backhanded statements like this looks like you're lowballin luv

And let's not start on you talking about Superman and tractors, lol. Let me know if you need the posts. Holla!!

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Didn't....didn't you do exactly that though?

And got called out?

And let's not start on you talking about Superman and tractors, lol. Let me know if you need the posts. Holla!!

Me bringing up stuff doesn't mean I put him or any of whomever Dark is mentioning in that tier. Lol... Dark is a master at lowballing (Marvel characters). Yes, I mentioned Superman getting slapped upside the head with a tractor (when others start lowballing, like Dark) but I have never used that as an indication of his power. When a DC fanboy start lowballing, I show them exactly what they are doing and him getting koed by a tractor is the perfect example of this. Dark mentions Thor Boulder showing to limit his true power. Dark handicap Marvel characters because he is the embodiment of a fan boy which is the reason he will always be on ignore.

Originally posted by carver9
Lol just got stunned by a tractor being thrown at him. He was also stunned by a bike being ramped into him as well.

Bike..

http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/30676430/Superman_2016-_012-018.jpg.html

Tractor...

http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/30676437/Superman_2016-_012-013.jpg.html

It can't get any worse than this.

No one was using low showings. Let me know. Also, in the thread with the AntiMonitor, NO ONE was using low showings

Yet you brought up the Honda. Let me know, holla!

Originally posted by -Pr-
So you want us to use a high showing as an average rather than a low one, even though both would be wrong to use?

Feats wise, although holding back he was shown to be far above Bill. He casually one shot a monster the Avengers team(Iron Man, Shulk, Ghost Rider, Cap) could not beat. As per Cates they were "beaten and bruised".
Saved amped Galactus when he godblasted out of Black Winter, while in the middle of getting their mind, body, and soul consumed.
Can readily send lightning blasts that can shatter continents.
Casually tank planetary explosion at least twice.
Then of course the Galactus showing where Galactus is at his most powerful form historically.

Surviving as long as he did with Black Winter alone really should put his durability way up there even when adding that boulder surprise.
BW is basically a trans universal entity that has easily consumed countless universes.

Theres nothing that suggests 8th day juggs or HP DD are anywhere on this level.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Agreed.

Like creating threads like this 👆

Haha 😂 😂

Originally posted by carver9
Nope, just THAT version of Thor is FAR more powerful than Galactus (since he did stomp a Galactus that admitted he's never been as powerful). Not only that, after stomping Galactus, he turned around and wrecked a Universal level being. The question should be, after Thor did that (and tanked a planet exploding on him) why are members of KMC ignoring this and using a rock knocking him over as his average? Also, why is he being pitted against HP Doomsday? He WRECKED the most powerful version of Galactus, WRECKED a Universal level being, stomped both with ease in less than 4 pages but yet, HP Doomsday can beat him. A lot of members here are DC bias and is blind to anything other than DC top tiers having good showings. This is why I said it's throw up worthy.

You know why Carver, a good portion of people here hate Thor and lowball him every day. As far as the thread goes. Galactus should easily one shot. Far to many options.

Lol...so much fail here.

What feats does this amped version of Galactus have?

Originally posted by carver9
Nope, just THAT version of Thor is FAR more powerful than Galactus (since he did stomp a Galactus that admitted he's never been as powerful). Not only that, after stomping Galactus, he turned around and wrecked a Universal level being. The question should be, after Thor did that (and tanked a planet exploding on him) why are members of KMC ignoring this and using a rock knocking him over as his average? Also, why is he being pitted against HP Doomsday? He WRECKED the most powerful version of Galactus, WRECKED a Universal level being, stomped both with ease in less than 4 pages but yet, HP Doomsday can beat him. A lot of members here are DC bias and is blind to anything other than DC top tiers having good showings. This is why I said it's throw up worthy.

He's more powerful because he drained Galactus? The conclusion doesn't necessarily follow Carv. So does that mean Thor can output the same power as Galactus?

He used Galactus energy to best the Winter. It's called a plot device. Thor couldn't have beaten Winter without that device. Therefore, the feat has no bearing on Thor beating DD. You getting as worst as Quan now. Bran supports because you are pro marvel and doesn't call you or on your bad logic.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Lol...so much fail here.

What feats does this amped version of Galactus have?

He have all of Galactus fts and like he said, he amped far beyond that. So start there.

Originally posted by h1a8
He's more powerful because he drained Galactus? The conclusion doesn't necessarily follow Carv. So does that mean Thor can output the same power as Galactus?

He used Galactus energy to best the Winter. It's called a plot device. Thor couldn't have beaten Winter without that device. Therefore, the feat has no bearing on Thor beating DD. You getting as worst as Quan now. Bran supports because you are pro marvel and doesn't call you or on your bad logic.

Be quiet.

Originally posted by carver9
Be quiet.

So you admit to trolling the thread and using bad logic on purpose.

H1 is right this time, Carvatron.

Originally posted by carver9
He have all of Galactus fts and like he said, he amped far beyond that. So start there.

What feats does this amped version of Galactus have? If you wanted to use old Galans feats why did you make a thread about amped Galan?

The issue I have with this thread and any the others like it is that you're using Thor's feats to boost Galans. GALACTUS did nothing but say he's stronger than he was but still got wrecked. You would've been better off saying Annihilation Galan or a Galactus that actually did something. You're using a featless character against a character with feats. Any reasonable poster would not vote for him.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
What feats does this amped version of Galactus have? If you wanted to use old Galans feats why did you make a thread about amped Galan?

The issue I have with this thread and any the others like it is that you're using Thor's feats to boost Galans. GALACTUS did nothing but say he's stronger than he was but still got wrecked. You would've been better off saying Annihilation Galan or a Galactus that actually did something. You're using a featless character against a character with feats. Any reasonable poster would not vote for him.

Again, this is the SAME Galactus that we have seen on panel for years except he is amplified. Does Superman turn into a different Superman in other comics? Is Hulk on the Avengers the same Hulk in his comic. Like, what kind of comments are these? Are you ok? Again, this is the same Galactus that we know. He didn't mighty morph into another character. With that said, THE GALACTUS WE KNOW, amped himself further off rich planets and became far more powerful THAN THE GALACTUS WEVE ALWAYS KNOWN and his fts remain the same. Until you prove that we have two different Galactus's floating around in Marvel, use this respect thread and get fts from here if you want them...

https://amp.reddit.com/r/respectthreads/comments/3risls/respect_galactus_marvel_earth616/

I'm leaving this open just so Pr destroys Carver.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
What feats does this amped version of Galactus have? If you wanted to use old Galans feats why did you make a thread about amped Galan?

The issue I have with this thread and any the others like it is that you're using Thor's feats to boost Galans. GALACTUS did nothing but say he's stronger than he was but still got wrecked. You would've been better off saying Annihilation Galan or a Galactus that actually did something. You're using a featless character against a character with feats. Any reasonable poster would not vote for him.

ffs it's the same Galactus but amped more than he was against the Celestials, it's so easy to comprehend it. Why do you always try to give DC the benefit of doubt? it's tiresome

Originally posted by Badabing
I'm leaving this open just so Pr destroys Carver.

😂

Bring it Pr.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
ffs it's the same Galactus but amped more than he was against the Celestials, it's so easy to comprehend it. Why do you always try to give DC the benefit of doubt? it's tiresome

She's... different. She thinks that this Galactus by some miracle is different than the Galactus from other comics. I don't know if she thinks another Galactus came from a different dimension or if Wolverine used his Decepticon powers and transformed into Galactus but her entire argument is boo boo.