Galactus (amped) vs HP Doomsday

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
ffs it's the same Galactus but amped more than he was against the Celestials, it's so easy to comprehend it. Why do you always try to give DC the benefit of doubt? it's tiresome

For example, Galactus was twice as powerful as the most powerful we have seen him is PURE SPECULATION.

Originally posted by carver9
Again, this is the SAME Galactus that we have seen on panel for years except he is amplified. Does Superman turn into a different Superman in other comics? Is Hulk on the Avengers the same Hulk in his comic. Like, what kind of comments are these? Are you ok? Again, this is the same Galactus that we know. He didn't mighty morph into another character. With that said, THE GALACTUS WE KNOW, amped himself further off rich planets and became far more powerful THAN THE GALACTUS WEVE ALWAYS KNOWN and his fts remain the same. Until you prove that we have two different Galactus's floating around in Marvel, use this respect thread and get fts from here if you want them...

https://amp.reddit.com/r/respectthreads/comments/3risls/respect_galactus_marvel_earth616/

Carver we go by feats on this forum. What feats does this Galactus have? It's a simple phucking question

But Carv derailed the thread with trolling by arguing that using plot devices to win implies that one can shoot stronger blasts, is physically stronger, more durable, etc.

Originally posted by h1a8
For amped characters with no feats and no specified amount of the amp then we can only go off other versions to determine their power level. Why? Because we can only speculate how much amped the character is over the other versions

For example, Galactus was twice as powerful as the most powerful we have seen him is PURE SPECULATION.

That's the dumbest shit i seen today, He scales above the long history of appearances/feats he has in his regular state.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Carver we go by feats on this forum. What feats does this Galactus have? It's a simple phucking question

Originally posted by h1a8
But Carv derailed the thread with trolling by arguing that using plot devices to win implies that one can shoot stronger blasts, is physically stronger, more durable, etc.

IT'S Galactus he doesn’t need feats. His potency depends on his level of hunger. Worlds he’s devoured
If you read the arc. You know how strong he was. It's that simple

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Carver we go by feats on this forum. What feats does this Galactus have? It's a simple phucking question

I'll help you out. Galactus has matched the Phoenix Force...

https://m.imgur.com/aYnczDl

Makes a blast that covers 3 star systems...

https://m.imgur.com/a/m3ng0

Fought In-Betweener...

https://m.imgur.com/a/JE7CU

The list goes on. Now imagine this Galactus becoming more powerful by eating planets and admitting on panel he's never been that powerful. There goes your fts.

Originally posted by h1a8
But Carv derailed the thread with trolling by arguing that using plot devices to win implies that one can shoot stronger blasts, is physically stronger, more durable, etc.

If Odin gave Silver Surfer his power on top of Surfer own power, is Surfer more powerful or is his power level the same?

Speculation- he’s twice as powerful as he’s ever been
Fact- he’s stronger than he’s ever been and therefore scales above all previous appearances

he said it after absorbing planets that were noted to be especially potent with his appearance changing as he absorbed energy from one after another. It's not up for dispute

Originally posted by carver9
If Odin gave Silver Surfer his power on top of Surfer own power, is Surfer more powerful or is his power level the same?

But you are arguing that Thor is more powerful (stronger blasts, more durable, etc) than Galactus BEFORE Thor takes away Galactus power (or because he has the ability to take away Galactus power).

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Speculation- he’s twice as powerful as he’s ever been
Fact- he’s stronger than he’s ever been and therefore scales above all previous appearances

he said it after absorbing planets that were noted to be especially potent with his appearance changing as he absorbed energy from one after another. It's not up for dispute

Originally posted by h1a8
It's speculation to assign an amount of how much more powerful though. He may be 1% more powerful, 10%, 1000%, etc. All of it is speculation and unusable.

He said he's more powerful than he's ever been which speaks volumes. That is the biggest 1% ever. Now stop lowballing.

Originally posted by carver9
I'll help you out. Galactus has matched the Phoenix Force...

https://m.imgur.com/aYnczDl

Makes a blast that covers 3 star systems...

https://m.imgur.com/a/m3ng0

Fought In-Betweener...

https://m.imgur.com/a/JE7CU

The list goes on. Now imagine this Galactus becoming more powerful by eating planets and admitting on panel he's never been that powerful. There goes your fts.

Originally posted by h1a8
But you are arguing that Thor is more powerful (stronger blasts, more durable, etc) than Galactus BEFORE Thor takes away Galactus power (or because he has the ability to take away Galactus power).

He powered through the attack as if it was nothing and then took away his power. Galactus couldn't hurt him so what does he have to prove other than taking him of everything and killing him afterwards. Picture this. I'll say it in a way you'll understand. Imagine Superman walking through Darkseid Omegas, walk right in his face and put his hand on top of Darkseid head and take all his power away from him. Is Superman more powerful? Yes or no?

Originally posted by Sin I AM
I specifically said what feats DOES THIS Galan have

And I showed you since it is the same Galactus. Lol.

Question, is this Superman ftless? Remember, Superman showed up once in Damage comic.

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-9faef6ca28a2254ad70dad3b2e16f003

Diana showed up in Damage comic once and he did well against her. Is Diana ftless as well since it happened in a Damage comic? Wait, does all of Superman fts that happen in JLA just belong to JLA Superman?

This is the first time Thor showed up in Immortal Hulk. Is this Thor ftless?

https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11137/111374993/6800504-4qqdqfj.jpg

Let me guess, the Avengers team Hulk fought here is ftless?

https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11137/111374993/6800507-tntcu2z.jpg

What kind of debating is this? Again, Galactus get all of his fts since it is the same freaking character. Different comics doesn't wipe away a characters fts. I hope this isn't what you've been thinking this entire time. You honestly believe that Wolverine in an xmen book is different than Wolverine in an Avengers comic. 😂

I bet you was confused when Onslaught was bouncing around in Avengers, Xmen, and Fantastic Four comics.

Originally posted by carver9
And I showed you since it is the same Galactus. Lol.

Question, is this Superman ftless? Remember, Superman showed up once in Damage comic.

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-9faef6ca28a2254ad70dad3b2e16f003

Diana showed up in Damage comic once and he did well against her. Is Diana ftless as well since it happened in a Damage comic? Wait, does all of Superman fts that happen in JLA just belong to JLA Superman?

This is the first time Thor showed up in Immortal Hulk. Is this Thor ftless?

https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11137/111374993/6800504-4qqdqfj.jpg

Let me guess, the Avengers team Hulk fought here is ftless?

https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11137/111374993/6800507-tntcu2z.jpg

What kind of debating is this? Again, Galactus get all of his fts since it is the same freaking character. Different comics doesn't wipe away a characters fts. I hope this isn't what you've been thinking this entire time. You honestly believe that Wolverine in an xmen book is different than Wolverine in an Avengers comic. 😂

I bet you was confused when Onslaught was bouncing around in Avengers, Xmen, and Fantastic Four comics.

You're a shitty debator. I ask you about Galactus and you post Superman scans.

I thought that the writers put it all in the comics? Thor was more powerful than the amplified Galactus, and he shows this by going on to defeat the Black Winter a being capable of destroying universe with ease. Why is this concept so hard to understand? This is well above Doomsday’s range.

Originally posted by Stoic
I thought that the writers put it all in the comics? Thor was more powerful than the amplified Galactus, and he shows this by going on to defeat the Black Winter a being capable of destroying universe with ease. Why is this concept so hard to understand? This is well above Doomsday’s range.

Originally posted by Stoic
I thought that the writers put it all in the comics? Thor was more powerful than the amplified Galactus, and he shows this by going on to defeat the Black Winter a being capable of destroying universe with ease. Why is this concept so hard to understand? This is well above Doomsday’s range.

It's simple bee go by feats. Not hyperbole

Hyperbole- exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally
First issue of Donny Cates run, Silver Surfer- “worlds whose rare...and unique energies would give Galactus powers beyond imagination”
Galactus after absorbing Surfer’s 5 planets- “I am more powerful than I have ever been”

Originally posted by Sin I AM
I specifically said what feats DOES THIS Galan have

Getting killed, lol.