Galactus (amped) vs HP Doomsday

In the Old King Thanos thread no one was bringing all of this up. Lmao

Originally posted by Sin I AM
You're a shitty debator. I ask you about Galactus and you post Superman scans.

I already posted Galactus scans, lol. This is the same Galactus that was in...

Fantastic Four: Antithesis #4
Fantastic Four: Antithesis #3
Doctor Strange #16
Doctor Strange #15
Fantastic Four: Behold… Galactus
Infinity War
Doctor Strange sorcerer supreme

My question to you is, why are you asking me what did THIS Galactus do? Do you think it's a different character?

Galactus should kill him

At the end of the day, H/P Doomsday lost to Imperiex in one hit. He was killed by Entropy blast. I'd imagine Galactus can kill him pretty easily as well

Originally posted by carver9
I already posted Galactus scans, lol. This is the same Galactus that was in...

Fantastic Four: Antithesis #4
Fantastic Four: Antithesis #3
Doctor Strange #16
Doctor Strange #15
Fantastic Four: Behold… Galactus
Infinity War
Doctor Strange sorcerer supreme

My question to you is, why are you asking me what did THIS Galactus do? Do you think it's a different character?

Originally posted by Sin I AM
so the Galan that appeared in those book did so after the amp he received?

The Galactus that appeared in those books is the same Galactus that Thor fought. Why are you not comprehending this? Are you saying Silver Surfer can beat this Galactus, yes or no. Ft vs ft, Surfer should win, right? This argument is dumb. I'm going to say this again, just because a character is in a different comic doesn't mean their previous showings doesn't count. If Galactus destroys 20 Universes in Silver Surfer number 12, he is still a Universe buster in Fantastic Four #100, even if he just sits there in the entire comic. You're smarter than this, Sin.

Originally posted by carver9
The Galactus that appeared in those books is the same Galactus that Thor fought. Why are you not comprehending this? Are you saying Silver Surfer can beat this Galactus, yes or no. Ft vs ft, Surfer should win, right? This argument is dumb. I'm going to say this again, just because a character is in a different comic doesn't mean their previous showings doesn't count. If Galactus destroys 20 Universes in Silver Surfer number 12, he is still a Universe buster in Fantastic Four #100, even if he just sits there in the entire comic. You're smarter than this, Sin.

Naw you're moving the goalpost. You specifically stated the amped GALACTUS that was amped. The featless Galactus that got his ass beat. If you wanted to use standards you would've just posted Galactus. I'm hip to your bs. Either post a feat showing this Galactus is stronger than previous incarnations or STFU and concede.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Naw you're moving the goalpost. You specifically stated the amped GALACTUS that was amped. The featless Galactus that got his ass beat. If you wanted to use standards you would've just posted Galactus. I'm hip to your bs. Either post a feat showing this Galactus is stronger than previous incarnations or STFU and concede.

You're the only one spouting this nonsense. I already posted fts for Galactus. You didn't accept it so it's well past time for you to move on. I can't help you understand common sense.

Back on topic, Thor destroyed an AMPED Galactus which puts him in a tier of his own right now. I wonder if Doomsday could beat this AMPED Galactus. Most gave the edge to this AMPED Galactus because they know that a character fts carry over from comic to comic. If he was FTLESS, people wouldn't have given him the win. Thanks peeps for answer who would win in this battle. I'm done here.

Galactus is not a new Character. It's the SAME galactus. He gets ALL his previous feats. It was flat out stated that he was amped and much stronger. it's funny how people run their mouth about this but don't say nothing about those feetless chains that was supposed to be hauling Stars and unbreakable. I'll tell you the bias on this site is ridiculous.

Originally posted by JBL
Galactus is not a new Character. It's the SAME galactus. He gets ALL his previous feats. It was flat out stated that he was amped and much stronger. it's funny how people run their mouth about this but don't say nothing about those feetless chains that was supposed to be hauling Stars and unbreakable. I'll tell you the bias on this site is ridiculous.

🤣🤣🤣... preach JBL. Sin thinks Galactus showings just disappear because he is in a new comic.

Originally posted by carver9
You're the only one spouting this nonsense. I already posted fts for Galactus. You didn't accept it so it's well past time for you to move on. I can't help you understand common sense.

Back on topic, Thor destroyed an AMPED Galactus which puts him in a tier of his own right now. I wonder if Doomsday could beat this AMPED Galactus. Most gave the edge to this AMPED Galactus because they know that a character fts carry over from comic to comic. If he was FTLESS, people wouldn't have given him the win. Thanks peeps for answer who would win in this battle. I'm done here.

You're an idiot. You're using Thor feats to validate Galactus.

Originally posted by JBL
Galactus is not a new Character. It's the SAME galactus. He gets ALL his previous feats. It was flat out stated that he was amped and much stronger. it's funny how people run their mouth about this but don't say nothing about those feetless chains that was supposed to be hauling Stars and unbreakable. I'll tell you the bias on this site is ridiculous.

You're also an idiot because you're co-signing his stupidity

Originally posted by Sin I AM
You're also an idiot because you're co-signing his stupidity

Originally posted by JBL
I don't argue with clueless women. You have no idea how stupid your post read. Calling a well-established character featless because he got an amp. But anytime a DC character gets an amp or have no feats, you say absolutely nothing, and Carver exposed you for the biased poster you are.

Sin is saying that Galactus ONLY gets his past feats. Nothing more.

Originally posted by carver9
If Odin gave Silver Surfer his power on top of Surfer own power, is Surfer more powerful or is his power level the same?

Who has better feats, WWH or Savage?

Originally posted by h1a8
Sin is saying that Galactus ONLY gets his past feats. Nothing more.

I think it's because comics are inconsistent.

Colossus, with the amp from Cyttorak AND 20% of the Phoenix Force, a limitless power of creation.....wasn't as impressive as all that. Certainly not Skyfather level.

Sodam Yat, a Daxamite who is on par with Superman, got the Ion entity AND a GL ring....and wasn't suddenly Skyfather level.

THIS amped Galactus, in his short number of showings, was hurt by Skuttlebutt, who is explicitly weaker than Beta Ray Bill, a mid herald.

In comics, amps don't mean much because we don't use handbooks to debate, we use on panel showings.

I mean....we could scale here right?

So DoS Doomsday survived a Guardian of the Universe (so..Skyfather?) kamikazing on him, which tore a hole in reality. This Doomsday is vastly more powerful on paper, so ignoring what he actually did in H/P, no energy attacks would even faze him.

Originally posted by carver9
Thor is FAR more powerful than this version of Galactus and people here (laughable at best) think Doomsday can take him. So if he could beat Thor, he should be able to outright stomp Galactus.

https://comicnewbies.com/2020/09/19/thor-kills-galactus/amp/

The bias is throwup worthy

Whatever. Galactus states on panel that he is more powerful than he had ever been in the past to his recollection. If you want to understand how powerful Galactus was , simply read his past appearances.

Originally posted by JBL
Wrong. Sin is saying that the Amped Galactus has no feats despite it being the same Galactus that has plenty of past feats.

Or just ask Sin this question : "Do you believe that this amped version has access to all his past feats?" Instead of jumping to conclusions.