Galactus (amped) vs HP Doomsday

Originally posted by Stoic
Whatever. Galactus states on panel that he is more powerful than he had ever been in the past to his recollection. If you want to understand how powerful Galactus was , simply read his past appearances.

We all know comic characters say things like this all the time. Spider-Man has NEVER been punched this hard before..... Superman has NEVER faced such a powerful opponent before.....Hulk has NEVER been angrier.....etc etc.

It doesn't mean squat, unless we have the feats.

Hypothetical Question :
If a character has lifted 100 tons in a comic (their best feat or the most they have been shown to lift in their history) but are much later (under a different writer) given an amp in strength and then lifted 80 tons but failed to lift 90 tons.

Does the amped version of this character get access to their old feat (100 ton feat) or they are limited to 80 tons since they failed to lift 90 tons but successfully lifted 80 tons?

Originally posted by Sin I AM
You're also an idiot because you're co-signing his stupidity

Originally posted by carver9
1 low showing by characters we have no indication on how strong they are versus an entire arc with nothing but high showings for the character? If I have 8 high showings and 1 undecided showing (we have no clue how strong the person was that threw the rock), the 8 high showings IS the average. Think about it like this, Antimonitor, current version, have minimum durability showings, but, he got hit by a car that explosion was strong enough to not only separate the 3 brothers but it weakened the Monitors. Is this their average or are we just accepting highs for them?

https://ibb.co/kQQZQxc
https://ibb.co/PgC8tjx

I want to point out that Antimonitor heard the horn before the car showed up. I'm throwing that out there for a reason. Please let me know if the monitors have less than car level durability.

Sounds like you just haven't read the rules of the forum, and that you want to have your cake and eat it too.

We go by averages. Highs, extreme or not, are still highs.

==

Also, victim mentalities belong on the GDF, not here. Kindly stop being little shits about it.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Naw you're moving the goalpost. You specifically stated the amped GALACTUS that was amped. The featless Galactus that got his ass beat. If you wanted to use standards you would've just posted Galactus. I'm hip to your bs. Either post a feat showing this Galactus is stronger than previous incarnations or STFU and concede.

How's he featless he took out four planets that were super charged with energy like they couldn't stop him . An he already had years of feats if he didn't have years of feats an then got a sudden Amp like goku that yeah that's stupid cause he hasn't done anything. We've seen galactus destroy a universe in atleast one occasion an it took two pheonixs not two users two actually forces to beat him in another one because he started eating one force. He doesn't needs feats he's already done everything he needed an Thor already used his gathered energy against the black winter which shows he had a shit load of energy he just didn't get a chance to use it.

Stop pretending like you know what you're talking about, it's embarrassing.

Originally posted by Diesldude
sin laying the smackdown. 😂
The three troll brothers tried to triple team her and she was still too much. Practically ignored little Trollberto and sent him to the sit in the corner.

😂 you deep throat anybody cock who's up against me, you're as much of a dumbass as she is but that's to be expected. 👍

The fact that he did all this to match black winter his former master who devoured universes that says more than enough to assume how powerful he had to be in the moment and you can’t say black winter is featless they literally show him devour galans universe.

Originally posted by JBL
I don't argue with clueless women. You have no idea how stupid your post read. Calling a well-established character featless because he got an amp. But anytime a DC character gets an amp or have no feats, you say absolutely nothing, and Carver exposed you for the biased poster you are.

Proverbs 27:15-17

Never argue with a woman.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
We all know comic characters say things like this all the time. Spider-Man has NEVER been punched this hard before..... Superman has NEVER faced such a powerful opponent before.....Hulk has NEVER been angrier.....etc etc.

It doesn't mean squat, unless we have the feats.

And yet The difference is that Surfer is the one that let's us know he is more powerful and Big G confirms with him eating the planets and we see the obvious change in him. 👍🏾

This thread hurts to read.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
😂 you deep throat anybody cock who's up against me, you're as much of a dumbass as she is but that's to be expected. 👍

The fact that he did all this to match black winter his former master who devoured universes that says more than enough to assume how powerful he had to be in the moment and you can’t say black winter is featless they literally show him devour galans universe.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
This thread hurts to read.

Originally posted by Diesldude
sin laying the smackdown. 😂
The three troll brothers tried to triple team her and she was still too much. Practically ignored little Trollberto and sent him to the sit in the corner.

Originally posted by h1a8
Please reread Sins earlier posts. It's clear she said that Carv might as well use annihilation Galactus (one of the strongest versions we seen).

Or just ask Sin this question : "Do you believe that this amped version has access to all his past feats?" Instead of jumping to conclusions.

That's not what Sin is saying. She said this Galactus doesn't have any fts and it's because he is in a Thor comic. Her post is the worst thing I've seen on KMC besides the post Dark always try to do to defend ridiculous posts.

Originally posted by Diesldude
but you get your ass raked on the daily. 😂 You three clowns tried to triple team sin and failed miserably. Smh

😂 How does her ignoring facts count as LaYiNg ThE SmACkDOWn

Only reason you dickriding her is cuz u so desperately want emotional support and cuz I don't take you serious and laugh at ur existence, stay butthurt idiot 😂

Originally posted by carver9
That's not what Sin is saying. She said this Galactus doesn't have any fts and it's because he is in a Thor comic. Her post is the worst thing I've seen on KMC besides the post Dark always try to do to defend ridiculous posts.

That's not what I said.

You've been here long enough. When you use a specific version HP Doomsday, Trion Juggernaut, Old Man Logan, KC Superman, whoever in the op... that particular characters feats are the ones we draw from. I never said we couldn't use his old stuff... he's still Galactus. I said his new stuff amounts to jack shit because he simply didn't do anything. And every time I ask for a feat you mention Thor's feats. You're using a no limit fallacy based off a statement and we simply do not debate like that here. We need proof. It's GALACTUS worst depiction. He couldn't even control the pc properly from a mere skyfather (if that) who's held the throne for like ten minutes. Show me what he did after the amp to prove that he's so far beyond the likes of Doomsday.

Same Galactus had Surfer hiding secrets from him..

And when amped, was hurt by Skuttlebutt, who is explicitly below BRB, a mid herald.

But no. That just shows how powerful BRB/Skuttlebutt/Surfer are, lmao. All circular.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
so the Galan that appeared in those book did so after the amp he received?

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Carver we go by feats on this forum. What feats does this Galactus have? It's a simple phucking question

Originally posted by Sin I AM
so the Galan that appeared in those book did so after the amp he received?

Continued. You're either taking back what you said or you believe an AMPED character gets weaker. Choose one.

Who has better feats, S1M or Superman?