Originally posted by Stigma
Ok. I see, got it.What I would say is that my argument was purely oriented towards guns and not intending to draw any parallels to the drug issue.
To add to the discussion, I am also aware of the argument of guns being a powerful deterrent against crime that seemed to be collaborated by the Pew Research study (I believe that was the source, can be wrong though) years ago.
This is a side of the issue also worth taking into consideration.
The issue of successful gun control in other countries is worth noting as well, I concur.
But I would add that we need to be very careful when juxtaposing policies of the US and other countires. Given its size, social ambience and cultural make-up the US is in many ways unique in a global context.
They aren't just a deterrent against crime.... the primary reason for the 2nd amendment is to deter the government from becoming tyrranical and stomping all over our individual liberties/rights.
Wusses can scream all day long about how tens-of-millions of private citizens wouldn't stand a chance against the government but I and most other freedom loving Americans would rather die fighting than become a slave to an authoritarian or totalitarian government.
Besides, I seriously doubt it would be nearly as easy for the government to crush any serious, coordinated resistance from a well armed population as they make it out to be. I mean, just look at how Afghanistan forces held our forces at bay for so long. It's obvious to me that hit and run guerrilla warfare would be an effective weapon against them.
Then of course you would also probably have like tens-of-thousands of military personnel at least who would simply refuse to follow illegal orders to fire on their fellow Americans who are simply protecting their God-given rights. When you join the military you swear an oath to the Constitution. I'm sure that many will actually remember that if the day ever comes when the government illegally orders them to fire on American citizens.
The real question is what will China or the UN do if it ever comes to that. Still, I would much rather die fighting than die as a slave or be among those who're slaughtered like sheep (as so many other tyrrranical governments have done to their citizens not long after disarming them) because I'm defenseless after being disarmed.
And for any idiots who think the United States government would never ever engage in the kind of mass slaughter of its own citizens as Mao, Stalin, Hitler, and so many other dictators have done you need to wake the f*** up to what had been going on in the world and the country recently and pay closer attention to the kind of scary totalitarian talk that has bern coming out of the mouths of Biden, Harris, Psaki, and other freedom hating democats. Yeah yeah, I know the talking heads at MSNBC, CNN, and the BBC never talk about things like that except of course when someone like Trump is in office then they just make shit like that up.
Ffs, they are talking about listing people who speak out against vaccines and lockdowns and who continue to question 2020 election as being terrorists. That shit is scary. You know that once you are labelled a terrorist it allows the government to take the gloves off and disregard all of your rights and do whatever the hell they want to you.
So yeah, we need our right to bear arms now more than ever. I'm not gonna engage with the idiots here who still make lame ass arguments that we should be disarmed.