Donald Trump ex President Thread: A thread for the collective and humourous fallout

Started by Old Man Whirly!72 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
"If we are going to have one nation under God, which we must, we have to have one religion. One nation under God, and one religion under God," said Flynn, who recently talked about his Christian faith in an effort to refute QAnon claims that he worships Satan. -snip

Oh Trumpers.... 😆

👆
Originally posted by truejedi
He would fit right in in Afghanistan...
👆 Disturbing as **** isn't it.

MAGA Lawyers Hit with Hefty Fees Over Election Suits

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Yesterday, U.S. District Judge Linda Parker ruled that the lawyers' conduct "warrants a referral for investigation and possible suspension or disbarment."

The judge described the pro-Trump case as "a historic and profound abuse of the judicial process," adding:

"Individuals may have a right to disseminate allegations of fraud unsupported by law or fact in the public sphere. But attorneys cannot exploit their privilege and access to the judicial process to do the same. And when an attorney has done so, sanctions are in order.

The attorneys who filed the instant lawsuit abused the well-established rules applicable to the litigation process by proffering claims not backed by law; proffering claims not backed by evidence; proffering factual allegations and claims without engaging in the required prefiling inquiry; and dragging out these proceedings even after they acknowledged that it was too late to attain the relief sought."

Parker went on to explain that the pro-Trump lawyers filed their case in the hopes of "undermining the people's faith in our democracy."

She concluded, "Despite the haze of confusion, commotion, and chaos counsel intentionally attempted to create by filing this lawsuit, one thing is perfectly clear: Plaintiffs' attorneys have scorned their oath, flouted the rules, and attempted to undermine the integrity of the judiciary along the way. As such, the court is duty-bound to grant the motions for sanctions."

Parker also ordered the lawyers "to pay Detroit's court costs and to undergo 12 hours of continuing legal education, including six hours on election law."

Any likeminded attorneys considering filing outlandish anti-election litigation should probably think twice.

A federal judge has ordered two Colorado lawyers who filed a lawsuit late last year challenging the 2020 election results to pay nearly $187,000 to defray the legal fees of groups they sued, arguing that the hefty penalty was proper to deter others from using frivolous suits to undermine the democratic system.

The two lawyers, Gary D. Fielder and Ernest John Walker, filed the case in December 2020 as a class action on behalf of 160-million American voters, alleging there was a complicated plot to steal the election from Donald Trump and give the victory to Joe Biden.

The two argued that a scheme was engineered by the voting machine vendor Dominion Voting Systems; the tech company Facebook, its founder Mark Zuckerberg, and his wife Priscilla Chan; and elected officials in four states. They had sought $160-billion in damages.

Re: MAGA Lawyers Hit with Hefty Fees Over Election Suits

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
A federal judge has ordered two Colorado lawyers who filed a lawsuit late last year challenging the 2020 election results to pay nearly $187,000 to defray the legal fees of groups they sued, arguing that the hefty penalty was proper to deter others from using frivolous suits to undermine the democratic system.

The two lawyers, Gary D. Fielder and Ernest John Walker, filed the case in December 2020 as a class action on behalf of 160-million American voters, alleging there was a complicated plot to steal the election from Donald Trump and give the victory to Joe Biden.

The two argued that a scheme was engineered by the voting machine vendor Dominion Voting Systems; the tech company Facebook, its founder Mark Zuckerberg, and his wife Priscilla Chan; and elected officials in four states. They had sought $160-billion in damages.

thy just hang on every detail like it matters

Must be an ai

Y'all don't know how to interpret the difference

Dozens Watched Lindell's "Patriot Thanks-A-Thon"

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
During a podcast, Lindell said that he would begin presenting his case to the Supreme Court two days before Thanksgiving, which he predicted would captivate the world.

"Guess who's going to talk about it for four days over Thanksgiving? Every person in the world!" he said. "Everybody's watching for this!"

He then predicted that all nine Supreme Court justices would be blown away by the evidence he presented because "they're there to protect our country, they've lived the American dream."

Mike Lindell has claimed millions were tuning in to his "Great Patriot Thanks-A-Thon" streaming special, but the metrics suggest otherwise. Mr Lindell, a conspiracy theorist, began hosting a 96-hour live stream at 1:00 a.m. EST on Thanksgiving Day, where he promised to discuss his Supreme Court complaint seeking to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Just after midday, Mr Lindell claimed: "There are probably millions of people watching right now" However, just 24 people were tuned into his Freedom Patriot Network YouTube channel. On Mr Lindell's website, which was also streaming the broadcast, it was not clear how many people were watching, but around 90 people were participating in a live chat at the time.

Mr Lindell claimed: "There are probably millions of people watching right now" However, just 24 people were tuned into his Freedom Patriot Network YouTube channel. -snip

😆

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Mike Lindell has claimed millions were tuning in to his "Great Patriot Thanks-A-Thon" streaming special, but the metrics suggest otherwise. Mr Lindell, a conspiracy theorist, began hosting a 96-hour live stream at 1:00 a.m. EST on Thanksgiving Day, where he promised to discuss his Supreme Court complaint seeking to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Just after midday, Mr Lindell claimed: "There are probably millions of people watching right now" However, just 24 people were tuned into his Freedom Patriot Network YouTube channel. On Mr Lindell's website, which was also streaming the broadcast, it was not clear how many people were watching, but around 90 people were participating in a live chat at the time.

All Kmcers or ex Kmcers?

Trump’s ‘fact-free’ approach caused briefing challenges, CIA report says
Ex-president’s chaotic style resulted in presidential daily briefing being delivered more regularly to Mike Pence

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/nov/29/donald-trump-fact-free-presidential-briefings-cia-report?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

facepalm 🤣 Fact free! laughcry crylaugh

Like usual, reads like an 'The Onion' headline, but was reality under Trump's presidency.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Trump’s ‘fact-free’ approach caused briefing challenges, CIA report says
Ex-president’s chaotic style resulted in presidential daily briefing being delivered more regularly to Mike Pence

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/nov/29/donald-trump-fact-free-presidential-briefings-cia-report?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

facepalm 🤣 Fact free! laughcry crylaugh

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/opinion/cia-woke-video-liberal-agency-fred-fleitz.amp

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has issued a new recruitment video that has caused a great deal of controversy. It features a 36-year-old CIA officer who uses progressive rhetoric like "intersectional," "cisgender," and "millennial." Instead of discussing the Agency’s important mission to protect American security and freedom, the CIA officer says: "I used to struggle with impostor syndrome. But at 36, I refuse to internalize misguided patriarchal ideas of what a woman can or should be."

Many Americans were puzzled why the CIA would produce a video focusing on political correctness and far-left politics. But as someone who worked as a CIA analyst for 19 years, I wasn’t surprised since I have watched the left take over the Agency over the last 30 years with no effort by Republican administrations to clean house.

Liberal bias in the CIA goes back many years. During the Cold War, conservatives complained CIA analysts were slanting their analysis of the Vietnam War, playing down the threat from the Soviet Union, and arguing there was a moral equivalency between American and Soviet foreign policies. When Robert Gates was first nominated to be CIA Director in 1987, a group of liberal CIA analysts testified against him. (Gates withdrew this nomination but was nominated again and confirmed as CIA Director in 1991).
In the 90s, the CIA politicized its analysis to support President Clinton’s disastrous "Assertive Multilateralism" national security strategy that sent lightly armed UN peacekeepers to Haiti, Bosnia and Somalia with tragic results.

CAL THOMAS: WILL CIA SOON STAND FOR 'CENTRAL INSANITY AGENCY'? TEAM BIDEN WEAKENING AMERICA FROM INSIDE OUT

CIA officers actively worked to undermine President Bush in the 2000s. Aside from leaks of intelligence to the press to hurt the Bush administration, Paul Pillar, the CIA’s national intelligence officer for Near East and South Asia, gave a notorious speech in September 2004 criticizing Bush’s Iraq policy to help John Kerry win the 2004 presidential election.

Incredibly, CIA management cleared Pillar’s comments, saying that the substance of his remarks, but not the speaker or the audience, could be disclosed. The late columnist Robert Novak, who attended the dinner, sparked an uproar when he reported Pillar’s identity and the dinner anyway.

Efforts by CIA officers to undermine the Bush presidency were such a problem that the Wall Street Journal ran an editorial in September 2004 condemning them as "The CIA’s Insurgency."

Liberal bias and politicization of intelligence in the CIA and other agencies exploded during the Obama administration. This included the politicized talking points on the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attacks and slanting analysis of Iran’s nuclear weapons program to support the deeply flawed 2015 nuclear deal with Iran (the JCPOA).

But the worst distortion of the CIA’s mission began under Director John Brennan when he implemented his Diversity and Inclusion Strategy in 2016 to make the CIA more diverse and politically correct. Brennan said in the introduction to this strategy:

Diversity at CIA is defined as the wide range of life experiences and backgrounds needed to ensure multiple perspectives that enable us to safeguard US national security. It encompasses the collection of individual attributes that together help Agencies pursue organizational objectives efficiently and effectively. These include but are not limited to characteristics such as national origin, language, race, color, disability, ethnicity, gender, age, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, socio-economic status, veteran’s status and family structures.
Brennan mandated "diversity and inclusion performance objectives for all CIA managers and supervisors and ultimately [for] the entire workforce." This required CIA personnel to weigh diversity and gender figures in making key assignments and senior-level promotions. Brennan’s plan also includes agency-wide "unconscious bias" training.

CIA officers perform sensitive work with high level security clearances. Some of this work is dangerous. The Agency was not the place for Brennan to be implementing President Obama’s social engineering efforts with hiring and promotion quotas.

Brennan got away with this because the CIA had drifted so far to the left after Republican presidents had repeatedly failed to clean house to return it its national security mission.

The CIA recruitment video reflects how the Trump administration was unable to clean up the CIA in Trump’s first term.

CIA Director Mike Pompeo had little chance to clean house at CIA since he was there just over a year before President Trump nominated him to be Secretary of State.

Pompeo’s successor Gina Haspel, a career CIA officer, did not openly oppose President Trump’s policies but oversaw and encouraged the Agency’s leftward movement.

She did nothing to curb the stream of leaks to the press from intelligence officers to undermine the Trump presidency. Haspel also refused to cooperate with repeated orders from the president to bring classified documents on the now-debunked Trump campaign Russia collusion hoax to the White House. Haspel should have been fired for this insubordination. The recruitment video is part of a CIA YouTube video series called "The Humans of CIA" that began under Haspel’s directorship. President Trump planned to fire Haspel if he had been reelected and would have named a new director to enact major reforms.

This recruitment video is a warning sign of how severe liberal ideology is rotting the mission of a crucial intelligence agency with a multibillion-dollar budget. Instead of performing its national security mission, the Agency’s leftist leadership and the Biden administration plan to continue to use it to conduct social engineering and to politicize intelligence against the administration’s political adversaries.

The next Republican president, who I hope takes office in January 2025, will have an enormous mess on his or her hands at the CIA and other national security organizations due to leftwing woke-ism running amok in them during the Biden administration.For the good of our national security, the next Republican president has to do better filling the top positions of these crucial organizations by nominating principled and experienced managers from outside government with the backbone to enact major organizational changes to streamline and depoliticize them – and to endure the resulting fierce blowback they will encounter from taking such action from the press and congressional Democrats. This must include new standards for hiring and promotions and firing incompetent staff who were hired solely for the sake of political correctness.

CIA is engaged in deadly serious business to protect our freedom and security. There is no room at CIA for woke, politically correct personnel schemes.

Originally posted by Robtard
Like usual, reads like an 'The Onion' headline, but was reality under Trump's presidency.
Yup!

Originally posted by cdtm
Wrong thread for CIA conspiracy theory false equalisation trolling Cdtm. facepalm

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Wrong thread for CIA conspiracy theory false equalisation trolling Cdtm. facepalm

Fox News is no more conspiracy then CNN is.

Strike that, CNN promoted too many debunked dossiers and leaks to be considered a credible source.

Originally posted by cdtm
Fox News is no more conspiracy then CNN is.

Strike that, CNN promoted too many debunked dossiers and leaks to be considered a credible source.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Because your posts typically add nothing to the decor of the forum. All fluff no substance if you will. Then when challenged on whatever wildly provocative statement you gleaned and copy/pasted from some incel conservative subreddit, you conveniently tuck tail and switch topics or feign victim. All while self fellating yourself on baiting another user into acknowledging your existence.

Meadows: Trump Tested Positive Before Biden Debate; Falsified Results

Donald Trump tested positive for COVID-19 three days before his first debate with Joe Biden, his fourth and last chief of staff has revealed in a new book.

Mark Meadows also writes that since each candidate was required "to test negative for the virus within seventy two hours of the start time," Trump returned a negative result from a previous test in order to do the debate.

So Trump purposely tried to infect Biden with COVID.

Was that the debate where Trump made fun of him for wearing a mask?

Luckily he was smart enough not to listen to the anti-mask rhetoric from the same dummies who are anti-vax now.

It was.

Trump and Trumpers mocked Biden for wearing a mask multiple times, claimed it was a sign of weakness and looks stupid. Then when Trump finally wore one, they called Trump a "badass". Silly cult.

No, they actually turned on him and booed him. Trump is not the madness, he just tried to capitalise on the madness. It's what he does.