North Korean defector: US schools are nuts

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Intolerance is great, violence isn't.

Intolerance often leads to violence. eg When a bunch of homophobes bash a gay kid, it's not because they're tolerant of that person's sexuality.

YW.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Intolerance is great, violence isn't.

Many liberties people enjoy to day were in fact earned through violence in some form whether we like it or not.

It's on the job society to create better feedback loops in our processes so things that would normally lead to violence get fixed earlier.

When that doesn't happen though do not be surprised when violence is used.

Originally posted by Robtard
Intolerance often leads to violence. eg When a bunch of homophobes bash a gay kid, it's not because they're tolerant that the person's sexuality.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Right, because the larger cultural context.

Kim IL sung and his lineage have complete cultural hegemony - total top down control.

This is propped up and maintained socially - laterally - meaning the reason people can be publicly executed is because it's largely socially acceptable.

We are seeing a shift in this regard In america, which is why GoFundMes for the rioting deviants banked them a net gain for destroying the property of others.

Another 10 years and it will be equivalent to the cultural revolution in maoist china or Il jong's nk

Your edgy babble aside, the point is that America schools are not as indoctrinating as North Korean schools, or worse, as is being pushed here by you and others. You can believe it and that's fine, people believe stupid shit all the time, or pretend to believe it to be an edgelord, but neither makes it a reality.

Originally posted by Newjak
Violence isn't great but it can be effective.

Many liberties people enjoy to day were in fact earned through violence in some form whether we like it or not.

It's on the job society to create better feedback loops in our processes so things that would normally lead to violence get fixed earlier.

When that doesn't happen though do not be surprised when violence is used.

Explain to me how the liberties we have today were through violence. Love to hear that.

Originally posted by Robtard
Your edgy babble aside, the point is that America schools are not as indoctrinating as North Korean schools, or worse, as is being pushed here by you and others. You can believe it and that's fine, people believe stupid shit all the time, or pretend to believe it to be an edgelord, but neither makes it a reality.

Why am I being edgy ? Look up the history of public schools.

Why do you think nk has public schools at all ?
Because the regime really cares about kids ? Or to brain wash them to be subservient ?

Any role the state takes from families the more the family unit dissolves. The more the family unit dissolves, the more the state can step in. This is the logical progression of totalitarianism.

Public schools = family unit dissolves = leads to totalitarianism, got it.

I wouldn't want my kids in public school.

I'd rather have them home schooled.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Explain to me how the liberties we have today were through violence. Love to hear that.

You do understand American Revolutionary war was violent? Thus the freedoms you enjoy under the constitution were formed from violence?

A number of labor laws were passed only after violent strikes.

There was the Stonewall Riots which helped push better liberties for LGBTQ.

The Civil War.

The French Revolution is another one.

You can also point the coup of the English monarchy which Whirly can talk to more.

There is also the coal miner's riots which helped give better working conditions.

Honestly I'm just pulling these examples off of my head. You should be able to find many many many more examples.

Originally posted by Newjak
Really?

You do understand American Revolutionary war was violent? Thus the freedoms you enjoy under the constitution were formed from violence?

A number of labor laws were passed only after violent strikes.

There was the Stonewall Riots which helped push better liberties for LGBTQ.

The Civil War.

The French Revolution is another one.

You can also point the coup of the English monarchy which Whirly can talk to more.

There is also the coal miner's riots which helped give better working conditions.

Honestly I'm just pulling these small examples off of my head. You should be able to find many many many more examples.

It's like he's never read a book.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Right, because the larger cultural context.

Kim IL sung and his lineage have complete cultural hegemony - total top down control.

This is propped up and maintained socially - laterally - meaning the reason people can be publicly executed is because it's largely socially acceptable.

We are seeing a shift in this regard In america, which is why GoFundMes for the rioting deviants banked them a net gain for destroying the property of others.

Another 10 years and it will be equivalent to the cultural revolution in maoist china or Il jong's nk

Originally posted by Newjak
Really?

You do understand American Revolutionary war was violent? Thus the freedoms you enjoy under the constitution were formed from violence?

A number of labor laws were passed only after violent strikes.

There was the Stonewall Riots which helped push better liberties for LGBTQ.

The Civil War.

The French Revolution is another one.

You can also point the coup of the English monarchy which Whirly can talk to more.

There is also the coal miner's riots which helped give better working conditions.

Honestly I'm just pulling these examples off of my head. You should be able to find many many many more examples.

Wasn't the American revolutionary war fought over being taxed ?

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Wasn't the American revolutionary war fought over being taxed ?

it was fought over taxation without representation

so you have nothing but more lies disguised as "oops" misstatements. I'll just go ahead and ask finally: are you ddm?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it was fought over taxation [B] without representation

so you have nothing but more lies disguised as "oops" misstatements. I'll just go ahead and ask finally: are you ddm? [/B]

What did representation mean in this case ?

Benjamin Franklin didn’t like tax on tea so George Washington started shooting people.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
What did representation mean in this case ?

the colonial governors had no say in parliament yet their people had to pay the same taxes as those who did, obvious snake who might be ddm

https://mises.org/wire/american-revolution-was-free-trade-revolution

To justify this, the protectionists invent fantasies, such as the one in which all taxation is now justified because there is "representation." This is, of course, a fantasy based on an absurd notion that a few hundred millionaires in Congress could possibly "represent" 320 million Americans spread across a varied geography of more than three-and-a-half million square miles.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the colonial governors had no say in parliament yet their people had to pay the same taxes as those who did, obvious snake who might be ddm

Me and ddm got in a fight because he's a statist cuck who supports the statist quo.

I'd rather be mistaken for star wars an cap guy

YouTube video you mean this guy?

Originally posted by Blakemore
YouTube video you mean this guy?

I wish I had moves like that.