Originally posted by h1a8
Its not. Because this is a bait thread. Its based off the other thread.
If AM uses propulsion then he swims faster than Hulk. Simple.
If AM uses muscles then he swims faster than Hulk and is stronger than Hulk. Simple. Either way, AM swims faster than Hulk and no one here will vote otherwise.If you cant see that this is a useless bait thread then you are bias and also not qualified to participate here.
So you think just because someone can swim faster than someone else that automatically makes them stronger?
Originally posted by FrothByteThat has nothing to do with the discussion.
So you think just because someone can swim faster than someone else that automatically makes them stronger?
The discussion is now If AM used muscles to lift the submarine (not propulsion) then would that make him stronger than Hulk?
Originally posted by Silent Master
Per the OP, The discussion is swims faster. the answer is AQ due to his propulsion.
Originally posted by h1a8
Our discussion isn't about who swims faster since this is a bait thread. And you were not in the discussion.
The OP states that I was right about the discussion.
Originally posted by tkitna
It is about who swims faster. Its a simple question.
IOW, once again I was correct and h1 was wrong.
Originally posted by h1a8
That has nothing to do with the discussion.
AM swims faster simply because he has the better feats. This thread is to establish that AM uses propulsion to swim (bait thread). This thread was created before King posted the interview.The discussion is now If AM used muscles to lift the submarine (not propulsion) then would that make him stronger than Hulk?
The answer is no. He didn't only use muscles to lift the submarine. So drop it.
Originally posted by h1a8
Hulk didn't one shot it and what Hulk actually did was 1000x weaker than the submarine feat.
He didnt one shot it? 😆 The Hulk stopped it in its tracks and practically made a slinky out of it. How do you not consider that a one shot? Did you even watch the movie?
Also, how are you factoring the weight, momentum, and durability of the Leviathan and the power and force of the Hulks punch to put it down like he did? Give us some of your space numbers.
Originally posted by tkitna
He didnt one shot it? 😆 The Hulk stopped it in its tracks and practically made a slinky out of it. How do you not consider that a one shot? Did you even watch the movie?Also, how are you factoring the weight, momentum, and durability of the Leviathan and the power and force of the Hulks punch to put it down like he did? Give us some of your space numbers.
One shot means ko idiot. Everyone knows that. Hulk didn't stop it with a punch. He slowed it down by bracing himself against it through the concrete. The stopping force was transferred from the concrete through Hulk's arm. You claim that the stopping (or slowing) force was more than 600,000 tons. Prove it.
Originally posted by h1a8
One shot means ko idiot. Everyone knows that. Hulk didn't stop it with a punch. He slowed it down by bracing himself against it through the concrete. The stopping force was transferred from the concrete through Hulk's arm. You claim that the stopping (or slowing) force was more than 600,000 tons. Prove it.
Just like "everyone knows" that your opinion = writer's intent?
Originally posted by h1a8
One shot means ko idiot. Everyone knows that. Hulk didn't stop it with a punch. He slowed it down by bracing himself against it through the concrete. The stopping force was transferred from the concrete through Hulk's arm. You claim that the stopping (or slowing) force was more than 600,000 tons. Prove it.
Just when everybody thinks you cant get any dumber, you post again.
The freaking thing was incapacitated after the Hulk punched it. The momentum of the Levethian caused the Hulk to slide backwards after he punched it. What is this crazy stupid concrete bit your pulling out of your ass?
You claimed that Aquamans submarine feat was superior to Hulks although the Levethian is vastly larger in size. How did you come up with Aquamans propulsion feat to be better. That questions on you.
Originally posted by tkitna
Just when everybody thinks you cant get any dumber, you post again.The freaking thing was incapacitated after the Hulk punched it. The momentum of the Levethian caused the Hulk to slide backwards after he punched it. What is this crazy stupid concrete bit your pulling out of your ass?
You claimed that Aquamans submarine feat was superior to Hulks although the Levethian is vastly larger in size. How did you come up with Aquamans propulsion feat to be better. That questions on you.
Heres some facts:
1. Leviathan weighs less than 1000 tons (less than 500 tons) and the submarine weighs more than 7,000 tons.
2. Ignoring the weight (assuming sub was weightless) then the submarine feat was calculated to be more than 560,000 tons (again not including the weight). The feat of the leviathan was calculated to be between 100-1000 tons (depending on the estimation of the weight).
Look at 3:01 was final numbers
https://youtu.be/pU1kngVYIh0
Since now you been given the calculations, the onus is on you to prove that the leviathan feat took more than 560,000 tons.
Originally posted by tkitnaWait, based on what?
You claimed that Aquamans submarine feat was superior to Hulks although the Levethian is vastly larger in size.
I actually know how large Aquaman's submarine was.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akula-class_submarine
It would have been well over three hundred feet long.
There's no official numbers for the length of one of the Leviathans, but this person calculated it to be 255 feet:
This guy calculated it as just a little longer than the submarine Arthur would have lifted:
https://www.fanverse.org/blogs/marvel-cinematic-universe-calc-1-leviathans-size-and-weight.35783/
And to be about the same weight, or less for some models of that sub.
Without any official numbers calculations of its size are all we have to go on.