Stupid thread. They were equals. Why? Because the writer wasnt trying to tell the audience there was a difference. Intent is everything.
The stones doing work isn't the same thing as Hulk or Thanos doing work. The premise of stones doing more equals more backlash is not necessarily true.
The premise that it takes more energy to disintegrate than to put matter together (like replicators on star trek) is not necessarily true either.
As already noted, Hulk's snap expanded more energy as he was creating, not destroying.
But there's no reason to believe Thanos couldn't survive doing the same thing. He's already shown to have survived destroying half the universe and then destroying the stones. Both on a lesser level than Hulk's creation-snap, but still impressive in their own right.
Hulk also had a very specific durability advantage as the film went on to tell us, his gamma sourced powers helped mitigate a lot of the personal damage one takes when using all the stones in such a manner.
Originally posted by h1a8
Stupid thread. They were equals. Why? Because the writer wasnt trying to tell the audience there was a difference. Intent is everything.The stones doing work isn't the same thing as Hulk or Thanos doing work. The premise of stones doing more equals more backlash is not necessarily true.
The premise that it takes more energy to disintegrate than to put matter together (like replicators on star trek) is not necessarily true either.
Bingo! 👆